Imaara Zuhaire
May 1, 2023
Introduction to Human Evolution
Professor Robert Scott
Fossils are an important tool to help tell stories about the history of the world and humankind. Fossils help answer important questions such as how humans evolved over time, what their lifestyles and diets looked like or where they migrated from. Anthropologists see fossils almost as celebrities because of their rarity. This importance is portrayed through the lens of Lydia Pyne in Seven Skeletons: Evolution of the World’s most Famous Human Fossils. Seven Skeletons is an exploration of scientific and cultural significance of human skeletons throughout history. The book takes the audience through a journey through time, inspecting seven different skeletons
…show more content…
Within the chapter it discussed the role that museums played in the development of science and understanding the past of humans, “Museums proliferated, taking the cabinets of curiosities from older generations and creating formal institutions, giving these newly amassed collections of animals, plants, and fossils new life.” (Pyne 15). Along with this in mind , the mid-nineteenth century marked the origin of Neanderthal research. Many historians took great interest in looking through records of material culture-artifacts and stone tools. The findings of Neanderthal fossils and its artifacts was a huge breakthrough in archeological and paleo-anthropological research. In discovering Neanderthals (August 1856), this led scientists to other important yet simple questions such as, “Where had Neanderthals come from? What did their culture and technologies look like? And why did they die out?” (Pyne 19). This is important because the findings of new fossils bring up important questions to solve the overall question of where did humans come …show more content…
It is a fossilized skull of a young child who lived in what is now South Africa around 2.8 million years ago. The discovery of the Taung child is important because it challenged the ideas and research of the new era of human evolution in Africa. In the chapter, the large question was whether or not the Taung child had any relation to humans. Sir Arthur Keith, who was a British anthropologist ( and an advocate for scientific racism), “...Doubled down on his claim that the Taung Child’s species wasn’t ancestral to modern humans”(Pyne 97). But outside of him, the public got word of the discovery of this fossils and the question of whether or not this fossil was apart of human history still linger-but lingered even louder which newspaper articles debating on the subject as well. On page 101, there is a sketch by Paleoanthropologist Raymond Dart depicting what the Taung child would look like if alive. In short, despite the skepticism of Sir Arthur Keith, Raymond Dart helped recognize that the Taung child fossil is a primitive hominin meaning that it is a member of the human lineage. The discovery of this fossil was a huge milestone in the history of paleoanthropology–by Pyne sharing this important anecdote of the journey and importance of the Taung child, it gives readers a clear understanding and can connect it to the beginning of the book when
In the exhibit for The Humans Outside of Africa, there were different skull fossils that were studied and categorized as potentially male or female. However, it is also notable that there were fossils (D2700 and D2735) that were examined to be that of an adolescent. Therefore, this provides paleoanthropologists with a basis for studying the Dmanisi hominids on a generational basis, from adolescent to old
Article Review #3 The article “Ardipithecus ramidus: A New Kind of Ancestor: Ardipithecus Unveiled” written by Anna Gibbons, talks about how scientist learn many things about human evolution through artifacts of ancestors, DNA and bones. All of this helps reveals different things about our past and how we came to be. This article briefly mentions Lucy and it mainly focuses on the discovery of ardipithecus ramidus.
We measured the skulls of the fossil hominins: Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Neanderthal. We measured the length, height, width and orbit height of their skulls to calculate the estimated brain size and estimated body mass. Hypothesis 1. For Life History, humans will reproduce earlier than the primates and apes because of their body mass.
There is a common misconception about the field of paleontology. Many people believe it’s boring, that it’s irrelevant, and that it’s even a waste of time. However, as award winning paleontologist and author Neil Shubin argues in his novel, Your Inner Fish, the field of paleontology has the potential to change the way we view our bodies. Shubin rose to fame in the mid ‘00s after discovering a brand new fossil on the coast of Ellesmere Island. This fossil was of a creature that was part land animal and part fish, containing the flat head and joints of a land animal and the fins and webbing of a fish.
Ancestors in Our Genome, addresses the continuingly advancing disagreement upon whom our closest ancestor is within the great apes, described as the hominoid trichotomy debate. The author, Eugene E. Harris examines many different sources of evidence within the book, and with the help of improvements in biological and DNA technology he helps discover who our closest ancestors were. Also when we were first separated from them and how the separation took place. Although there have been many recent advances in technology, a large number of unanswered questions are still a mystery within our genome and evolution from the great apes. Chapter one discusses the debate of morphology - studying fossil evidence of the great apes - versus molecular
The Piltdown fossils man was the missing link between apes and humans found in 1911 and 1912. The fossils included a portion of the skull, a jawbone and a few teeth. The relics were said to be found in Piltdown, England by workers digging a pit. The scientist discovered that the jaw and teeth were not the same age as the skull and were not even fossils, just old
As Darwin would describe the hominid transition, us humans were better fit to survive and reproduce on Earth’s landscape. Our superiority drove the Neanderthals to extinction. An article published in Science compares the 4 billion nucleotide DNA sequence of the Neanderthals to modern day humans. The researchers identify a number of genomic regions that may have been affected by positive selection, including genes involved in metabolism and in cognitive and skeletal development. Genetic sequencing studies support this claim as well.
This skeleton, named the “Kennewick Man” due to its location in Kennewick, Washington, was the oldest, most well-reserved skeleton found in North America. Shortly after the remains were unearthed, controversy and debate surrounded the home and origin of the skeleton. “Archaeologist Dr. James Chatters, working on contract with the Benton County coroner, thought that the bones might not be Native American.” If this were proven to be true, it would cause massive waves in what we thought we knew about our science and history. Initially classified as “Caucasoid”, Chatters modified his
With research done to fossils and skeletons of possible primates from the past with comparison to primates of the present shows
The reasons that archaeologist give as the significance of studying ancient Native American skeletal remains is that they want to study about the lives of others in the past. They want to know who Native Americans are, their origins, and their heritage. The skeletal remains offer the
Introduction The evolution of man has always been a controversial topic. However, no matter what your beliefs are the fact is that man evolved from primates. There is very credible fossil evidence to back this up. Fossils allow us to dig deeper into our past and give us an understanding of what life was like for our ancestors.
This discovery proved that this fossil was the bipedal middle between an ape and human. Chapter 5– Questions 1-4 Roy was explorative, and passionate about nature at a young age. He loved to fish, hunt and camp, and had his heart set on being a naturalist and explorer. These characteristics made him perfectly capable to be a skilled explorer. Roy's exploration consisted of reconstructing the plateau of Central Asia (geology, vegetation, past climate, and fossils).
Deborah Swarthout Modern Man and Neanderthals WCCCD-Fall 2017 Modern Man and Neanderthals: Where did they go? It has long been thought that modern man evolved from the Neanderthals. Although we have many similarities, the most recent studies suggest that modern man actually co-existed alongside the Neanderthals and interbred with them to create the modern man we know today. Neanderthals or Neandertals (Homo Neanderthalensis) are considered to be our closest extinct human relatives.
Critical thinking questions: physical anthropology textbook 1. Given that you’ve only just been introduced to the field of physical anthropology, why do you think subjects such as skeletal anatomy, genetics, nonhuman primate behavior, and human evolution are integrated into a discussion of what it means to be human? The study of physical anthropology integrates the subjects of skeletal anatomy, genetics, nonhuman primate behavior, and human evolution because anthropologists look to the fossilized remains of hominins to see what their environments were like and what they ate. In addition to these sub fields, anthropologists look to skeletal anatomy to see any evolutionary change or if the hominin had died from any diseases and how old and tall
BIOLOGY RESEARCH ESSAY There is great speculation around evolution. As we are continually in the process of discovering the history of human beings, there are many questions surrounding this topic. One very interesting question is why ancient ancestors of homo-sapiens evolved to walk upright like we do today. An apes’ DNA is astonishingly similar to that of a humans, (97% the same) and yet, our bones’ shapes and structure are very different.