To make sense of mob mentality and the psychology/tactics of it, one has to know what it exactly is. In Source C, when the author thinks about mob mentality, “images of unruly crowds near the Bastille during the French Revolution” come to mind. While this is a good example of mob mentality, it can also occur within other circumstances. Another example of mob mentality is seen in Source B, where a “march and deadly assault on the Capitol” horrified people all across America. Within this group of mob mentality was a variety of people, most likely with different opinions, tactics, and mindsets. However, according to Source C, all groups of mob mentality have one thing in common. The author says, “those who have little or no money have nothing …show more content…
Therefore, this can cause a crowd to “grow and progress into something that is far more erratic and unstable”, according to Source E. This can be done by word of mouth, social media, etc. The reason why mob mentality has the word “mob” in it is because it involves a large amount of people that have been told the same, biased thing. In Source C, the author describes this sharing of rumors by explaining that “each man shook his neighbor by the hand, and far and wide the word was given that the whole system must fall.” So, what is mob mentality in simple terms? Mob mentality is a large, unruly crowd that has a certain goal to accomplish in mind. However, it is also a source of bias, venting, and inclusiveness. All of these sources influence how mob mentality …show more content…
According to Source C, social psychology gives us that deindividuation, identity, emotions, acceptability, anonymity, and diffusion of responsibility are prominent causes of mob mentality. It also says that “the larger the group or crowd, the more likely there will be deindividuation and diffusion of responsibility.” Deindividuation is the phenomenon that when people are in a crowd, they lose their consciousness and their everyday personality. According to Source D, this is “what compels people to do things in a group setting that they would never do on their own.” Source E infers that a “human’s natural desire to be included and accepted as part of the majority” causes this to happen. Therefore, Source E explains that people who want to find new ways of thinking and acting are prone to mob mentality because taking part in the ideologies of new groups as “anonymous members” can act as a starting point, or “middle ground”. This is common among people that don’t want to totally abandon their old behavior and lifestyle. The other common cause of mob mentality, diffusion of responsibility, is the perception that being in a group somehow takes away the individual responsibility of a person. Source D tells the reader that “people believe they won’t be held responsible for their actions if they think they are anonymous.” While anonymity never overrides responsibility, this phenomenon is present in everyone’s unconscious mind. Overall, the
Mob Mentality is a theme seen regularly in the book, “We’re Not From Here.” Mob mentality is when several people all act together on emotions rather than logic. It is commonly seen when the Zhuri gather together in swarms to attack Lan’s family. According to Psychology Today, one of the causes of mob mentality in groups is due to emotions and deindividuation. Most times when the Zhuri formed swarms, they were angry about the humans.
“The Lottery,” written by Shirley Jackson, shows an example of mob mentality. Mob mentality is when a person feels as though they need to be a part of a large group so they abandon their morals. In the novel, the citizens come together every year for the lottery which requires one person to be stone to death. In return, the town will be ridden of its bad luck and will have a successful harvest (Jackson.) This demonstrates mob mentality because all of the citizens follow the tradition blindly.
Mob Mentality: That escalated quickly… The website Investopedia defined mob mentality as “a form mentality characterized by a lack of individual decision-making or thoughtfulness, causing people to think and act in the same way as the majority of those around them”(Investopedia). Mob mentality usage was prominent in the world's history and is still being used today. In this essay mob mentality will be shown to you in a form of steps.
Martian Luther King Jr. had people follow him to help get rid of racism. Adolf Hitler used groupthink by speaking to the crowd that didn’t like the Jews and thought that they didn’t have a reason to be on earth. He made people believe that was the right thing to do. David Koresh used groupthink by telling people he was the “Spiritual Heir” and people believed him so they thought it was the right thing. The adults that followed him had made their children follow him to.
Mob Mentality Mob mentality is how people are influenced by others to adopt certain behaviors. Mob mentality works, because when people are in a group, they lose their sense of being a separate individual and become deindividualized. As a result, people may participate in activities they typically do not participate in as individuals. For example, when people applause for a performance, others join in due to the fear of being left out.
The only real way to combat the negative effects of groupthink is to cast aside your surrounding society’s norms of what is ‘good’ and ‘bad’, and to take a personal stance against that society no matter what the cost may be. The Salem Witch Trials as represented in The Crucible by Arthur Miller are a perfect, if slightly extreme, example of what herd mentality can lead to if left long enough to fester and grow. John Proctor is the character who takes a stand against his surrounding society, losing his life in the process but also breaking the thrall of groupthink for the town of Salem, effectively setting them free from the Witch Trials. There are two main types of people affected by groupthink: those who unconsciously go with the crowd and are unaware, and those who are simply too scared to speak up.
One will think that when individuals are in groups they will mostly likely be able to help, and come to a person rescue, well that is the opposite of that. When people are in groups they tend to run away from the problem, instead of coming together to come to a conclusion. When one part of the group is doing something, the whole group is going to follow. Not one member of the group will have the guts to stand up and do the opposite of the group. It is like the whole group think alike.
In relationship to the banality of evil, crowds are tied to Darwin’s evolution theory known as, survival of the fittest. Moreover, when analyzing the mob, the leader is generated from the crowd, as a result of vigorous power exhumed onto the leader. Hence, the leader comes vacant space occupied by the mass. These leader are not considered people because history defines individuals which makes man interchangeable and disposable. As the group flourishes it has a direct relationship to the destruction rate.
Without people there is no mob. Consequences must be established in order to stripe the mob of its source and energy. These consequences must usher the culprits back into the fierce reality of what they have
When people are in a group they most commonly choose to think with the group instead of individuals and when they do that it can cause them or the people around them to get consequences. The news article, the teleplay, and the historical research all show mob mentality at its prime, it shows how it could be fine and not do anything that bad but it shows us how it could be horrible. The Salem witch trial is one example of mob mentality and how people react when faced with the blame and are scapegoats. When individuals are blamed for something they didn't do, it causes them to go mad which could lead to death and hatred.
Psychologist Irving Janis explained some alarmingly bad decisions made by governments and businesses coined the term "groupthink”, which he called "fiascoes.” He was particularly drawn to situations where group pressure seemed to result in a fundamental failure to think. Therefore, Janis further analyzed that it is a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members ' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. According to Janis, groupthink is referred as the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups.
After reading and viewing the mob mentality pieces, I conclude that mob mentality led people to do disgusting acts that they would otherwise never do. For instance, in the article What is Mob Mentality, Smith states that mob mentality is the “...unique behavioral characteristics that emerge when people are in large groups”. This shows that people act differently when they are in large groups and do things that they would not be comfortable doing if they were by themselves. Smith goes on to say that people tend to want to be like others and do what others are doing, becuase when they see other people in a group doing something they figure that the person would not be doing it if it wasn't worth it so maybe they should try it.
Mob mentality occurs in The Lord of the Flies, especially when order is given to a group of people. “All at once the crowd swayed towards the island and were gone-following Jack. Even the tiny kids went and did their best among the leaves and broken branches” (Golding 38). This passage is showing leadership. The reader are also showing how Jack is the leader and everyone follows him and his orders.
“The Twelve Angry Men,” are a small group. Several theories of group performance are shown in the movie “Twelve Angry Men,” but they are subject to interpretation and run a less evident. Social facilitation, group polarization and social loafing are evident within the
It is a natural human instinct to want to be acknowledge by your peers, yet it is also important to be a critical thinker. Irving Janis in 1972 created the term groupthink. He believed groupthink occurs inside a group of similar people that want to keep from being different, resulting in incoherent decision-making. The 1957 film "12 Angry Men," uses groupthink, which influenced the verdict vote in the case of a teenager accused of murdering his father. The purpose of this essay is to examine groupthink and to represent Dr. Irving Janis’ symptoms of groupthink in the film.