Objectivity During World War II

969 Words4 Pages

During World War II, over 6 million Jews lives perished due to the Holocaust. Due to this fact, the Holocaust is considered one of the most tragic moments in human history. Any article based on these events can affect whatever audience it’s aimed for, whether it be mainly objective or subjective. Objectivity means to have no bias, judgment, or prejudice and provides only facts. This type of article provides to the audience’s intellect and is able to provide the readers with facts and data. On the other hand, subjectivity is the contrast of objectivity. Subjectivity means to have a judgment, bias, or prejudice towards a subject. This type of reading can mainly appeal to the reader’s emotions. Anyway, both of these methods of writing can change or alter the way the reader thinks and understands about historical events. The article, “The Nuremberg Laws Deprived Jews of Their Rights in Nazi Germany” provides its information about the Holocaust in a mainly objective way. In the article, “The Nuremberg Laws Deprived Jews of Their Rights in Nazi Germany”, there are numerous points where objectivity is found. In paragraph one, a sentence reads, “These racist Nazi laws were among the first of many that led to the Holocaust, the mass killing, and imprisonment of Jews in Europe during World War II.” This sentence is an example of objectivity. This is because the sentence structure shows a cause and effect sequence. The cause is the Nazi laws were created, and the effect was that the

Open Document