She begins by asking the question "How do we create?" We all have intentions whenn we are faced with a situation, any situation. All of us have a response. We have intention, what we think we should do. There is ambiguity. What we actually do, and what we think we should do. Do we justify by saying my intentions were good? That is the ambiguity. You notice disturbing hints from the universe. When i identify the question, distill the hints, clues, there 's focus. When you are writing, those hints, those clues have always been there. They have been obvious, yet not been. You need a focus. When i have a question, random things,all the flotsam and jetsam, become relevant, become obvious. There is no coinicidence, serendipity, in which you are getting all this help from the universe, but may also explan it by saying you now have focus. This leads to the question "why i 'm here?" what is the meaning of my life, what is my place in the universe. We all hate moral ambiguity in some sense, yet it is necessary in writing a story. It …show more content…
And i also can find that by imagining fully and becoming what is imagined and yet is in that real world, the fictional world, and that is how i find particles of truth not the abosolute truth, or the whole truth. And they have to be in all possibilitise, including those i never considered or rather, if there is an answer, it is to remind myself that there is uncertainty in everything and that is good, because then i will discover something new. And if there is a partial answer, a more complete answer for me, it is to simply imagine. And to imagine is to put myself in that story, until there is a transparency between me and the story that i feel what is in the story, in one story, then i come the closest to the feeling compassion. Because for everything in that question of how things happen, it has to do with a feeling. I have to become the the story in order to understand a lot of
Nearly all individuals are born with a strong sense of empathy; in fact, many can hardly tolerate the thought of killing or abusing others, even when dealing with enemies. Therefore, if an individual is going through adversity, another’s empathy will drive them into helping others to become resilient. In the non-fiction novel, Into Thin Air, author Jon Krakauer utilizes character motivation to develop the ideas of which an individual’s resilience is shaped by the compassion of others. Krakauer exemplifies the Adventure Consultants head guide, Rob Hall’s empathy towards Doug Hansen a couple times throughout the book. Towards the beginning of the book, Krakauer explains that it’s Doug’s second chance for success; which is only possible if it
Pema Chodron formerly said, “Compassion becomes real when we recognize our shared humanity.” People need to understand what people share is what makes everybody human. If they do not understand what makes us human than they will not know how to feel sympathy or compassion. If everybody thinks about it, we all go through some of the same situations. Everybody experiences, relationships, they may lose someone in their life, people make choices everyday, people may be obliged to use their flight or fight skills in survival, they might have to think about their morals when doing something, and everybody most definitely goes through different kinds of emotions every single day.
The story seems to tell itself, but that’s never the way
As stated before the act of protecting all beings is a thorough example of being compassionate. With that said, as the movie progresses there are a countless amount of examples present pertaining to compassion towards
Cameron Romero Mrs. Wolf ELA 1 23 January 2023 Empathy will allow us to step in someone else shoes and see the world from there point of view. In literature , empathy can be developed in a character through the circumstances of the plot and guide a characters development. This is seen with the character of Scout in Harper Lee’s novel To Kill a Mockingbird, and her interactions with other characters throughout the novel. Compassion can be shown in many different ways. This is shown in Harper Lee Novel To Kill a Mockingbird.
Every story has some common elements. In the Hero’s Journey; the elements are organized in a way that allows for infinite possibilities to occur. The ordinary world lets the reader get to know the hero by understanding his feelings, problems, and life. One common elements are stories have is they all have a problem. Every hero has a quest.
Her thought was going to change, and she thought the matter of trying to exist and trying to improve herself
Kierkegaard 's view of people having no character is incorrect, at best it’s flawed. In the Present Age his critique “no character and neither has abstract intelligence”, is due to passionless people having no values. Ambiguity arrives when Kierkegaard 's equates ‘being carried away’ to folly. Kierkegaard identifies character as something that is fixed ‘engraved’ and is largely based on people having global character traits that are influenced by society and one 's environment. My argument revolves around a particular question: Why is there common ambivalence regarding character?
(AGG) Fahrenheit 451 has a message that was once very clearly explained by John Lennon: “If everyone demanded peace instead of another television set, then there 'd be peace” ("Quotes about"). (BS-1) The main character in Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag, lives in a very material-desiring society. (BS-2) The citizens living in his society end up less compassionate due to this materialism.
In order for man to survive, love and compassion are required to maintain the peace for humanity’s survival and prevent us from destroying each other as a whole. In Markus Zusak’s novel The Book Thief the characters always thrived to show compassion throughout the novel. This has lead to the survival of other characters and even empowerment to characters who are still going to die. Zusak implies that by seeing
6) is a “dilemma stemmed from not having clearly established policies, procedures, or rules for handling the situation.” Another way of explaining uncertainty is simply not doing something based on the “complete lack of data”, according to David Wilkinson’s article the difference between ambiguity and uncertainty (2015, para. 5). General Patton’s courage to incorporate aerial attacks into his operational maneuvers showed his ability to avoid the ethical trap of uncertainty and set the precedence for utilizing aircraft during combat for tactical
The confusion made me read the whole story in order to understand the role of the two main characters who are mysterious, romantic, and wise. And also to identify the situation of the story through its setting which is confusing, imaginable, and dull. A teenage bodiless and genderless character
“Every one does evil acts through ignorance.” (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics) How should we be good? Is a question of discernment, The Jesuit Guide to Almost Everything reminds us, in true discernment; “All mature choices are between goods.” (Martin,cite this pg 311) the good is different for each of us and figuring out what it means personally, is an act of discernment in itself. Once we choose the our own path to the good the difficulty lies in exactly how to go about the good that we choose.