Sara Kim
Mr. Benard Kong
Research and Presentation
March 23, 2018
Animal Experimentation
Nowadays, more than ever, people are raising pets. If you stroll around a park or even walk around the streets, we can see few people walking the dogs. In fact, there are many places that allow pets and there are even pet cafes opened in a lot of places. Dogs and Cats are the mostly raised, as well as some wild animals or insects as followed. In Korea, there’s a proverb stating, “A Dog’s lot in the happiest gall” meaning that, living life as a dog is better than I do. This proverb comes from how pets are spoiled under the master’s hand; almost like the babies, they get taken care of. But would this mean that all those people whom raising pets are like the
…show more content…
The chemical is applied to the skin of the hairless animal or to the eye of the rabbit directly. On the other hand, chemical substances are fed repeatedly through the oral cavity of animals. The safety of various chemicals used in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and other industrial products sold on the markets are tested on animals before the exportation. Imagine pouring shampoo into the eye of a beagle dog to check for "safety" before a new shampoo is released. This process is repeated until the eyes are blinded or the eyeballs are removed. The company chooses to update the animal experiment rather than trying to find it, even if the similar experiments and content are already been done somewhere in the world. Even if there is existing experimental information, the result of animal experiment is a big difference of the body, and the same experiment is repeated. In particular, companies develop new products to compete with other companies, and the launch of new products means new animal experiments. For example, chemicals that are already been proved as ingredients in shampoos are on the market, but companies try to verify the ingredients they want to include in their new shampoo again through animal testing. They first and only consider the development of new products rather than animal life. However, this sacrifice of an animal’s life does not provide accurate information about the risk to humans in animal experiments. This is because the physical responses to test chemicals of different species, humans and animals, are not the same. Materials that were harmless to laboratory animals could be dangerous to humans, and substances that were harmful to animals could also be harmful to humans. Animals used in experiment are forced to die unconditionally in pain, such as bleeding, paralysis, and cramps. Michaela Kroeger introduced the '3R', which means reduction,
In other countries people do not hesitate to eat a dog or a horse however we do not eat those here because we have emotional connections to these animals. In India, for example, they eat their dogs but would never even dream of eating their cows; we are the exact opposite. Foer poses the question: if our neighbors do not own pets, would we even be able to be offended if they ate a dog for dinner? It really makes you think. Next, he asks us, why do we stray away from eating a severely impaired human, but not a pig with potentially more brain capacity than said human?
The publisher’s intended audience are people who advocate for the rights of animals and are searching for different methods of testing products. The purpose is to inform the people that animal testing is “old school” compared to the new innovative ideas. They want the people to be aware that these experimentations are not successful with the animals nor when they are tested on humans.
If animals testing was not done the scientist could have studied the experiment before to predict the
Even more frightening, these animals were later sacrificed and gutted for tests on their organs ("898. Butylhydroquinone, Tert...”). In some places, animal testing is required before putting new additives into foods. This requires the ‘torturing’ of animals and most likely the killing of them. Animal testing can be a very cruel process, in most cases animals get harmed during the process ("Product Testing: Toxic and Tragic.").
Making a new and safe environment would not only help the animals, but also put less emotional stress on the scientists. Only about seventy percent of the time animals experiment is reliable (Hamil 1). Many forms of medication used for animal research are relabeled or pulled off the shelf because they have sicken or killed a human patient (Moore 2). The experiments just fell far short of expectations (Conlee 1). When the medication are pulled, money is lost in the making and canceling the
II. Body A. Uses of animal testing 1) Education 2) Cosmetic research 3) Biomedical research B. Types of animals that used in laboratory and types of test 1) Mice and rats are the majority group: toxicity studies 2) Rabbits: eye irritancy
Animal testing has been banned in many countries around the world, except for America, Canada, Australia, and a few others (Cole). Animal life is deteriorating for numerous, unacceptable reasons, one being animal experimentation. In the span of one year, three hundred thousand animals perish in China (Cole). The extreme numbers are the consequences of animals being tormented from the unnecessary trials (Cole). Others claim that animal experimentation is the most favorable method of evaluating new products.
Modern-Day Animal Experimentation: A Necessity, or a Brutality? Animal experimentation is the act of testing products with non-human animal subjects intended for human use such as shampoo, deodorant, or cigarettes, before the product is mass produced and shipped out for human consumption. Research such as this will usually take place in pharmaceutical companies, medical schools, or universities. Not only is experimentation on animals unethical, it is completely unnecessary and out-dated. The term “animal experimentation” is very broad, and can mean one of a few things; however, drug/cosmetics testing is by far the most dangerous and controversial of all the subjects put together.
Animals are obviously different than humans, and many drugs/cosmetics react to animals and humans react differently. Because animals and humans are so different tests are not accurate and then humans are affected in turn. “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted
The scientist leaves the chemicals up for weeks on the without painkillers, while the rabbits bleed and eyes swell up. Most likely after
Millions of animals are abused and left to die a long exhausting death each year. Many people don’t know that the cosmetic products they own are tested to see if the products are safe for humans. In the process of the testing animals are tested using harmful chemicals that often burn the animal’s skins and the ruthless workers leaving them to die a long painful death. Animal testing is inhumane and should be banned. Animal testing kills and tortures millions of animals each year.
Animals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries
Research published within the last few years has expanded our understanding of animal sentience, suggesting that an animal’s potential for suffering harm is greater than has been appreciated and that safeguards must be reassessed; however, this type of newly gained information is not taken into account in the outdated ‘‘3 Rs’’ (Ferdowsian and Beck 2). This lack of laws protecting animals and the misinformed, deficient foundation for them ultimately causes animal test subjects to suffer every day with little to no protection from cruelty and unethical practices. The true value and dangers of using animal experimentation data for predicting human outcomes has become questioned in recent years by the scientific community and in fields such as
According to Murnaghan (2016), some companies breed and sell animals for the purpose of animal testing. Other than that, animal testing is done repeatedly to create an average for the purpose of accuracy. Since animal testing may happen more than once, additional cost may incurred. Therefore, besides losing more animals, we also lose an enormous amount of money on animal
By using animals, scientists can determine how the developing medication or cosmetic piece will have an effect on the body. The global resource for scientific evidence in animal research states that animals and humans share illnesses so animals can be used as models