“Apologies are defined as primarily social acts, carrying effective meaning” (Holmes, 1990, p. 1550). According to Brown and Levinson, 1987, apologies are politeness Strategies. An apology is primarily and essentially a social act. Reiter (2000: 44) further defines an apology as a “compensatory action for an offense committed by S (the speaker which has affected H (the hearer).” This study will examine the speech act of apology made by Saudi native Arabic speakers and British females. It investigates the differences of the apology strategies between these two groups. The study also investigates the role of culture in influencing the ways in which each group realise their apologies.
Research Aim
The aim of my study is to investigate whether
…show more content…
What apology strategies are employed by Saudi and British participants?
3. What characterizes the apology strategies used by Saudi and British participants?
Literature Review
Since the main focus of this study is on the speech act of apology by Saudi and British females, topics such as pragmatics, speech acts, the speech act of apology, cross-cultural studies on apologies, apologies in Arabic, studies on Arabic and apologies and gender will be reviewed in this chapter. It is important to mention here that the information in the review is mainly based on studies of Western culture, as the research on the speech act of apology in Arabic is small in comparison with the large corpus of research on Western apologies.
a. Pragmatics:
Pragmatics has recently become an important subfield of linguistics. Crystal (2004, p. 301), defines pragmatics as “the study of language from the point of view of users, especially of the choices they make, the constraints they encounter in using language in social interaction and the effects of their use of language has on other participants in the act of communication”.
b. Speech Act:
Speech acts, according to Austin (1962), are acts performed by utterances such as giving orders or making
…show more content…
Such studies aimed to indicate how their findings would support communication among people coming from a great variety of socio-cultural backgrounds. The most cited work on speech acts is the Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP). This work concerned the speech acts of requests and apologies; and its principle was to study how native speakers realize these acts and to discover any similarities and differences between native speakers and non-native speakers in their realization of these two acts (Blum-Kulka&Olshtain, 1984).
e. Apology in Arabic:
Although Arabic is now a widespread language in a great number of regions, it is notably that studies on apology by Saudi people in general, and particularly on females, is an area of research that is underexplored. However, there are a few studies that have investigated the use of the speech act of apology by speakers of different dialects of Arabic such as (Al-Zumor, 2011; Hussein &Hammouri, 1998; Soliman, 2003).
f. Apologies and
Therefore, in this essay, I will share my encounters in these three topics, apologies, criticism, and fighting. In Tannen’s first article, she goes over a few miscommunications involving apologies.
In the article, “Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics: Introduction”, Paul Gee informs the reader about his way of talking about literacy and linguistics and what the terms mean to him. How the term language is a misleading term. As he mentioned, "Language" is a misleading term; it too often suggest "grammar. " It is a truism that a person can know perfectly the grammar of a language and not know how to use it. It is not just what you say, but how you say it.
The Skin That We Speak The way a person speaks is a direct link to a person’s culture and the environment which he or she was raised in. A person’s language, skin color as well as economic status influences the way he or she is perceived by others. Lisa Delpit and eleven other educators provide different viewpoints on how language from students of different cultures, ethnicity, and even economic status can be misinterpreted due to slang and dialect or nonstandard English by the teachers as well as his or her own peers. The Skin That We Speak: Thoughts on Language and Culture in the Classroom by Lisa Delpit and Joanne Kilgour Dowdy, who collected essays from a diverse group of educators and scholars to reflect on the issue of language
Christopher McCall Laura Retersdorf English 1102 10/12/16 Annotated Bibliography Buchhandler-Raphael, Michal. " Overcriminalizing Speech. " Cardozo Law Review 36.5 (2015): 1667-1737.
Sex, Lies and Conversation There are many differences between a man and woman, communication is just one difference. Deborah Tannen, a University of California graduate, got her PhD in linguistics at Georgetown University; there she studied the communication between men and women. Tannen has published over one hundred articles and wrote over twenty books, including You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation (1990), which spent almost four years on the New York Times best seller list and was translated into twenty-nine languages. The article Sex, Lies and Conversation appeared in the Washington Post in 1990 and gives insight to how opposite sexes communicate with each other. From an early age we are programed to play and be friends with the same gender as our own.
It’s better to try to escape everything before it gets even worse, not to apologize. And for people saying that when you apologize, there is closure. Well what happens if there isn’t? There’s no point in trying to apologize if things isn’t going to be the same leading to discomfort and unhappiness between both
Kingsolver cannot communicate with the people of Japan due to her lack of understanding of the culture and language until she memorizes different “degrees of apology” to say to the victims of her transgressions (Kingsolver 122). Barbara Kingsolver did not want to stand out from the people of Japan, but unlike Antoni, she knew it was inevitable. She first learns the different ways to say she was sorry for his
Socio-linguist Deborah Tannen demonstrates how men and women communicate differently in her essay “Sex, Lies and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” In her observations of communication styles, she discusses the way in which men and women communicate leads them to conflict because they have different understanding of their partners’ role. She also explains male and female communication differences not only cause ineffective conversation, but also push couples into a dilemma in their relationship; however, as men and women better understand the differences, their relationship improves. In the first part of her essay, Tannen discusses men and women do not have enough effective communication, which damages their marriage.
Commonly when approaching a peer, teacher, or a stranger, the first phrase to be said is often a form of polite speech. Polite speech can be categorized by the use of phrases that show regards for others. With some people backing the sense that what is said is portrayed as literal speech, most of it is said for the sake of sounding welcoming and responsible. Having polite speech implemented into people’s day to day lives serves the function of creating a well developed impression of a person.
The main points that will be looked at are the different genders, backgrounds, and groups. These are used to help to better understand why language is used differently. The research done by Deborah Tannen showed that
Introduction In 1876, Captain Nathan Algren, an ex- United States Army Captain is traumatized by experience fighting in the civil war and Indian war. Algren accepts a job by a Japanese businessman to train the Imperial Japanese Army to inhibit a samurai rebellion, led by Katsumoto Moritsugu. He sails to Japan. Most of the soldiers being trained are just slightly better than peasants and farmers that are not experienced.
One of these perspectives is analyzing communication through gender. In the book, You Just Don’t Understand, Deborah Tannen (1990) popularized the term “genderlect” to describe the way in which men and women communicate with each other. She suggested that men and women have different styles of conversing, forming two distinct dialects. In a review of Tannen’s book, DeFrancisco (1992) attributed the differing communication styles of men and women to the respective cultures in which they grow up. Because of such gender differences, misunderstanding between men and women creates a gap in the communication process.
Moreover, the definition of face has been widely debated. I intend to discuss the most salient issues related to the concept of face as it applies to the study of politeness. Goffman’s version of Face Goffman (1967:5) defined face as being: The positive social value a person effectively claims for himself by the line others assume he has taken during a particular contact.
Now I realized that in order to participate in and study intercultural communication requires us taking consideration of differences in understanding, values and attitudes that people with different culture background. These three factors can decide how to communicate and how to react and interpret messages that you have received. According to ( ), females are more strict with their work in most of culture in the world, they are more likely to
It affects the communication. Pragmatic rules: This governs how people interact or communicate on the everyday basis. These rules applied differently to different circumstances. For example, when manage comments on the sales person look.