Medieval Europe was “once regarded as a time of uninterrupted ignorance, superstition, and social oppression.” [a.] The social classes existed simply because of the Feudal System, a system which where all of the land belonged to the king. These social classes can simply be categorised into the nobles and the peasants. “There was a very distinctive social class system during the Middle Ages.”[b] 90% of medieval Europeans belonged to the peasant class – it was the lowest social class during this time. Peasants lived a hard life – a scarce diet, and long, tough work hours on farmland.
Barnes. Barnes states that the Farmers Alliance was a group created by both radical and reformates making the groups power dominant. the struggles these farmers faced was crop production was decreasing while the prices of purchasing increased. trying to fix this problem the trade system was created causing competition. another self-strategy was the alliance exchange making farmers focus on a central purchasing house.
The way in which the colonies made enough money to support England was based off as the geography of the land and how conducive the use of agriculture and cash-crops would be. The different climates of the New England and Chesapeake created different economies for each. In New England, the economy was based on shipbuilding and fishing because of long winters and the rocky soil that was not fertile. New England colonies, founded by primarily large families, only had small family farms as a result of the climate and turned to trade and industry rather than agriculture. The lack of need for farming for the economy led to the abolishment of slavery, as it was seen as unnecessary based off the economy.
Truthfully, it was a complete failure. The nation came to compromises on matters such as education and the economy, but in a bigger picture, racism was still an enormous and unacceptable issue. Since slavery was abolished, African Americans attained a more unfair version of freedom. They needed to make an income, find shelter, and gain experience in the world, so many freed slaves became sharecroppers. Sharecroppers farmed on land they rented from a landlord, in exchange for a share of the crop they produced.
Humanities Writing Assignment How Smart and Fair was the Feudal System? In the middle ages, the way that land was ruled and controlled was very different from the way our land is dealt with in the present day. They had something called the ‘Feudal System’, which was basically a series of grants of land in return for services and supplies. The whole system was based on loyalty, especially in the upper classes At the top of the rankings within the Feudal System was the King, who owned all the land in the country over which he governed. Naturally, he couldn’t control and farm it all, so he granted some of it to the highest ranking of his nobles and members of the church- barons, bishops, etc.
The late 1800s and the early 1900s marked the the beginning of the progressive era. The main goal of this era was to advance and equalize politics by limiting the power of big businesses and advancing social justice. This era also gave rise to the formation of new parties, one of them was the populist movement. The Populists or the People’s Party became relevant in the election of 1892 when they held a meeting at the Omaha platform resulting in a new party. Their formation was due to the unfair treatment of the farmers by those who had massive power such as monopolies, and being overlooked by both the Republican and Democrat parties.
Because of pressure, this system did not work much long time. Also industrial revolution and nationality in the world reconstructed the world economy. These elements lead to decline economy of Ottoman Empire. Decline in economy lead to less centralized government. Local administrators (ayan) gain more power in their land; they had more control than central government on taxation.
These revolts reveal the frustrations and the general socioeconomic crises of peasants. Today in the US, everyone has the right to be educated regardless of their social class. Even the lower classes can get an education, whereas in the Middle Ages, the peasants were not allowed to be
Though the emperor was a grand position, he had no real authority, just a title. Shogun law described the classes more specifically to include more defined roles. Again, hierarchically, people were classified as daimyo, court nobility, samurai, priests, peasants, townsmen, outcasts, and non-persons who were categorized as prostitutes and beggars(1,355). A unique aspect of this class structure is that peasants are noticeably high on the list and merchants are very low. This is because in this society the peasants were recognized as valuable and necessary for the sustainability of the society.
The biggest challenge which these countries faced was that their political-economic structure was how their underdeveloped economies were made to facilitate growth to the global capitalist (this sentence is confusing) These economies were now competing with each other with already developed countries(this too) These first world countries used their Multinational Corporations to further exploit the resources of the third world countries today. Today there is something called neo-imperialism which is mainly about structures of control. These structures are the World Bank, International Monetary Fund or multinational corporations that exert neo-imperialism around the world. Some suggest that neo-liberalism and free trade is about imperialism. Many make the argument that we are still living in a world characterized by
This led the colonists to rely on England for goods and the British taxed them on it. This is another reason why the colonists needed to break away from, to be able to trade with everyone all around the world. Overall the colonists broke free from England due to many reasons. The British acts violated many of the colonist’s rights. Also the British cut off trade for the colonist.
However, in contrast with the serfs, they were free except for the obligations owed to their lords and the rights their lord claimed over. The life of a serf from the late Middle Ages differed from peasants/ slaves through political burdens, land, and freedom.
However, the degree of leverage the wealthy truly have against the majority is a point of criticism. Many assume supermajority rules ensure the prohibition of results that severely damage people’s interest (Beitz 65). However, this argument presumes equal electoral engagement, and the effect of income inequality on this engagement is under considerable debate. Some theorists believe that the deep cleavage of inequality suppresses political engagement, especially amongst the poorest of society (Dahl 85-86). Other political scientists argue that greater inequality results in more political engagement (Brady).