Centrifugal forces are forces are forces that tend to drive a nation apart, rather than unite a nation. During the past half century in the United States, many centrifugal forces have affected this country continuously. One especially challenging force is the huge amount of diversity in the United States. Different religions, languages, culture, customs, immigrants, and ethnic groups clash against each other. This raises the issue of racism, which makes many minorities feel discriminated against. Another centrifugal force, in my opinion, is terrorism. After the attacks on September 11, 2001, people in the United States were really rude to Middle Easterners/ Arabs. This further drives a nation apart. There are also centrifugal forces in the …show more content…
About 50 states have populations fewer than one million. Even though Singapore may be small, it has a considerable amount of international influence. China has been struggling with their large population issue, but has had “dramatic economic growth”. Western Europeans and North American countries are only having one to three percent growth annually, whereas China is experiencing seven to ten percent. There is no ideal population for a certain country in the world. Japan has one of the most dominant economies on Earth. The Netherlands is overpopulated, but thrives, whereas Liberia is suffering. There are two important geographical clues to the organizational character of the state: 1. Nature of the state’s core area and 2. Size & functions of its capital city. Many European states grew from a core area, but growth was blocked by defined boundaries and neighboring countries. The farther away from the core area, the smaller the towns, the fewer the factories, and more open land. One of the world’s leading national cores are Japan’s Kanto Plain, France’s Paris Basin, Egypt’s Cairo-Alexandria axis and Nile delta, and Chile’s capital, Santiago. Multicore states are states that possess more than one core area. The capital city is the political nerve center of the country. Many former colonies spent much building their capitals to somewhat model London, Paris, Lisbon, or Brussels. Capital cities that are the largest and most economically influential are referred to as primate cities. Some newly independent states relocate their capital cities, which is a huge expense. Moving the capital sometimes opens up the interior of a country, prompting people to move there. The capital city generally symbolizes the state. Internal political organizations of states can influence many factors. Capital cities usually represented authority in the past. Europe’s nation-states were unitary states, and their
At the end of World War II, Western European powers sought political stability after a period of turmoil and devastation. Germany was divided into two spheres of influence: East Germany, controlled by the Soviet Union, and West Germany, controlled by the Allies. Western Europe attempted to unify in the post-war economy, and various views arose regarding this potential unity. The unification of Western Europe was met with opinions that were largely motivated by a nation’s own economic and political interests.
The Capitol in Williamsburg was a very important building in Colonial times. It was used as a, law school, a hospital, a court, a meeting place, and an academy. Patrick Henry gave his Caesar-Brutus speech there as well. The Capitol was the place where Virginia spoke for American Independence. A vote to speak for independence also took place here.
The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents
During the WWII, post WWII, and Cold War era throughout the 20th century, the United States of America was faced with many domestic and foreign conflicts. It was a time of change, action, and movements. Amidst the conflicts, the US was forced to make very controversial decisions. Through its government, the United States acted on these many problems and affected the quality of life of the people. Unfortunately, with these decisions made, the US failed to promote the liberty, equality, and justice for its citizens and the people of the world.
Sectionalism in the United States “A house divided against itself cannot stand”, said the president Abraham Lincoln. His words did not come out of nothing, but of the events happening in his lands during his term. One of the most efficacious episode in the history of the United States was the Civil War of 1861. As the 1800s went by, Nationalism seemed to emerge triumphant, meaning stronger sectional rivalries developed between two sections of the U.S. Historians conclude that the division between the North, known as the Free State, and the South, the slave states, had been adding up since the beginning of the eighteenth century, starting with small differences among the citizens.
States also wondered what type of government should there be, a strong central government or a less federal government. Each state had
As has been thoroughly established, the problem in America doesn’t appear to be related to the recent increase in partisanship. If the partisan argument were sufficient, it would suggest gridlock would occur in countries that also possess this same principle. What has been proven though is that this is not the case in other parts of the world, and instead quite the contrary often occurs. A new answer must be formulated to answer the question as to what is causing the consistency in America’s dissent and inefficiency. What appears to be the case is that rather than the actual, tangible partisanship being the problem, it is instead a lower tolerance for partisanship that America possesses.
There are a number of reasons that the small European states prospered and accumulated so much power during those centuries. The first reason was because they had wars frequently and that led to “the development of a particular kind of national state as the most successful form of European state” (84). Since the European wars were expensive and the European states participated in them a lot, they either had to tax their people or provide loans to people to bring in revenue. European rulers of the states used force to basically get their way, if needed, to help themselves during war. Living in this “war-driven environment” (88) some of the states had an advantage that led to them having large cities with a high capital and population to maintain
The Capitol had enormous historical significance and was of great importance during colonial times. They took the vote for independence, there
Although, the transnational technical community was the significant reason in which Taiwan has developed so rapidly. Institutions and markets have had a larger effect on Japan. The culture and history of Japan had strong values for building an economic empire and eventually its market grew to match it. It’s large enterprises formed its economic power. Although Biggart would lean towards the institutional approach, I partially agree that Japan’s institutions allowed for its growth but this was not the case for Taiwan.
D). The observed life expectancy for the U.S in 2016 was 76.5 and 81.2 for males and females, respectively, and their infant mortality rate in 2016 was at a very low 5.8 deaths per 1000 births (UNDP, 2016). In contrast, India has a population size much closer to that of China, at 1.3 billion people, and has a GNI per capita of 1,670 dollars (World Bank, n.d. C). Although India is of a lower economical rank, China and India are much closer together in economic status than compared to the extremely high GNI per capita of the US.
However, Gordon S. Wood presents evidence social status was more of a deciding factor on who supported a strong central government or an independent state assemblies. Each of these positions are examined and their merits discussed as it relates to
Most of the population were poor farmers, that had no idea what was happening within the country. Obviously this system was not the best. Eventually countries found a more efficient way of running their countries. A single ruler began to consolidate the power from the city-states and make a more uniform government for the country. The ways these absolute monarchs consolidated and increased their powers were similar in the 1600s and 1700s, by decreasing the nobles’ powers, increasing military, and increasing bureaucracy.
Although China’s land is not as big as Russia or Canada, but their number of people make up more than two countries. Overpopulation in China is one of the serious problems that the world is facing because it brings unemployment, exhaustion of natural resources and also environmental at pollution. Why is China’s population more than other country, because