Now she will forever be alone. If she was trying to punish her husband it worked he has a whole new viewpoint on her. He said “Oh, I married a tigress, not a woman, not a wife, and yoked myself to a hater and destroyer.” (Euripides 204). He was the one that turned Medea into this monster.
Do you know it? Have you heard it?/Don 't you notice when evils due to enemies/are headed towards those we love?" (Antigone, Line 8-12) Antigone proves her familial loyalty when, after her brothers kill each other, King Creon states that only one of the brothers is to be buried. The other brother is dishonored and must be left to rot. Antigone defies Creon 's orders and buries her fallen brother in spite of the law forbidding the act.
So although Macbeth was killed by rebels, Lady Macbeth has ultimate responsibility for his death. Lady Macbeth is responsible for killing her husband because she pressured him into the killing of others, which ended up getting him killed. As soon as Lady Macbeth found out she was becoming wife to the Thane of Cawdor, all she wanted was more power. Lady Macbeth applied pressure on Macbeth In Act 1 Scene 7 Lines 38-41 by saying, “. .
Madame Defarge creates a whirlwind of trouble and pain for all of the people she encounters. Throughout the novel, Madame Defarge acts cold and unfeeling; she wants to kill Charles Darnay because his cousins killed her family. Madame Defarge feels nothing, her heart contains only pure hatred ever since her family died. She strives to harm any person associated with her dark past, to hurt anyone that has hurt her, or even has the same bloodline as someone who hurt her.
One last time, Mariam did as she was told.” (371). The villain Rasheed was the reason why there was a sacrificer. Mariam saw the evil in Rasheed when he was trying to kill Laila and she knew that if she did not killed him, he would hurt the people she loved. Mariam killing Rasheed it lead to her taking the conscious and her dying, which is the moment Mariam became the sacrificer because she died for the one she loved.
Another mother-son relationship is that Iraz the woman who meet with Hatçe in prison, she is imprisoned because her son is murdered and after that, she burnt up the house that belongs to murderers of his son. In this part of novel, there is also strong connection between family members as a similar example of the first example which I
A very dependent person from her family, but for the main part from her father. Imagine that you receive the news that your father was killed and you are specially dependen from that person. Now imagine that the person that killed your father was the person you are truly in love with. When Ophelia knew that Hamlet had killed Polonius she turned insane. Losing a parent can turn anyone insane especially if it was killed by a special person from you.
Medea has already lost her husband and her home so this decision is an obvious one for her. She wants to leave everyone in the same misery that she has been experienced and continues to experience. After this, she even plans to murder her own children just to distress Jason further. Medea knows that she will live in regret and misery by doing so, but her need to sadden Jason trumps her own future feelings. The murder of her sons also symbolizes the death of her marriage with Jason.
First of all, Salamanca blamed Margaret for being a murderer and slaughter her husband. Phoebe told Sal that Margaret killed her husband and that she might have chopped him up with the help of Mr. Birkway, their English teacher. “Like Mr. Cadaver - as I told you before. Maybe Mr. Birkway helped her chop up her husband and bury him and maybe they were
Antigone is the daughter of Oedipus and Jocasta. In the beginning of the book, we find out that Antigone’s brothers have killed each other in war. One of the brothers, Polyneices is considered a traitor and Creon, the king, refuses to give him a proper burial. Antigone decides to disobey the king and give her brother a proper burial. Antigone loves the idea of a noble death and it drives her decision-making at the end of her life.
Antigone was sentence to death by King Creon for burying her brother after King Creon made a law to where you couldn’t bury him. Antigone did not deserve to die. She was the King Creon’s niece. They are family, Creon probably watch Antigone grow up as a kid and now he wants to kill her. People think she did deserved to die because she went against her family, well so did Creon.
The Revolution influenced extreme changes in the principles and opinions American people. Instituting the Republican ideals that affected the cultural society through social customs. In the late 18th century, the Republican Ideals terminated the British monarch’s authority and limited the governing power to elected officials, appealing to many of the colonist of different classes. The Republican Ideals after the Revolutionary war encouraged individuals to strive for equal rights especially with roles of gender and race along with the actions of separating church and state.
‘The Second Revolution: Thomas Jefferson & Haiti’ lecture was rather thought provoking as it urged listeners to challenge the true meaning of a revolution. The lecturers claim that a revolution is not a noun but an adjective contradicts its definition, further influencing listeners to ruminate on the ideals of a revolution. I agreed with his point that the Haitian revolution was a serious of events not just a single event. Much like the Haitian revolution, the lecturer details another revolution; The Thomas Jefferson revolution.
The late 18th and 19th century brought about an array of revolutions, which collectively shook the world; leaving the political, economic, social and cultural aspects far different than it had been before the influx of new ideas and conflicts. The French Revolution and the Haitian Revolution are prime examples of revolutions in this time period. Haiti was the French colony of St. Domingue and was the most productive colonial economy in the world, dominated by plantation agriculture. France dominated Haiti in means of attaining economic surplus and benefits by unnecessary means. Both revolutions shared evident similarities but also had fundamental differences in their causes and effects.