Contingency/situational theory of leadership can be defined as an organizational theory which states that there is no one way to organize, lead or make decisions in an organizations instead, it states that course of action is dependent on internal and external situations (contingent). A contingent or situational leader applies his or her own leadership style based on the situation at hand. Fielder in 1964, it emphasizes importance of both leader’s personality and the situation in which leader operation. This theory was proposed by the Austrian psychologist Fred Edward. The contingency leadership approach was founded by two earlier research programs conducted in 1950s. At Ohio State University, the researchers there administered questionnaires …show more content…
If as a leader, you only use one leadership style, there are situations where that very leadership style might not be applicable hence what will happen in such a situation.
From my experience I have seen people who feel that when you are in a position you are supposed to lead people in a particular way but what I try to emphasize is the fact that people cannot always be led in the same way. There are times when you can be a democratic leader, there are times when you will be autocratic in your behavior. The style of leadership here greatly depends on the situation which the leader finds him or herself.
1.3 SOCIAL CONTEXT Contingency theory of leadership is widely practiced in our society as we see that most times our leader’s actions and decision are made based on situations present. No one leadership style is applicable in all situations, hence our leaders usually use different leadership style to tackle their day to day situations in the course of their
…show more content…
In our dealing with patients and our colleagues, contingency theory of leadership is of necessity. E.g. In a situation where a patient needs an emergency care (a patient with respiratory failure), the nurse will have to rush into action and try to resuscitate the patient instead of trying to seek the opinion of the matron or doctor. In some other cases, where a patient is stable and gives a complain, the nurse tables that complain to the doctor who in turn prescribes drug for the patient based on the complaint. Hence contingency theory cannot be overlooked in our profession.
As charge nurses in the hospital, we are answerable to the supervisors directly and the supervisors are answerable to the matron directly. The matron is answerable to the hospital management. There are times when the junior nurses might make a mistake and as a charge nurse you can correct the person in love and teach the person the right thing to do. In other times, the junior nurse might decide to come late without informing anybody and when she does arrive, do not show any sign of remorse as to her late coming. At this point the charge nurse can decide to punish such a staff as this will prevent her from repeating such a
Seth Marshall Professor: Messersmith Comp 2 2/22/16 Different Leadership Styles All people have different opinions on how a leader should handle things. Such as war, people, poverty, and even themselves. Both Machiavelli in “The qualities of the prince” talks about on how a prince is supposed to be a leader and that good leaders must learn not to be convenient or compassionate to keep stability. Lao Tzu in “Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” believes in having a silent leader so the people will do what he wants them to do and fill like they are not being guided.
There are three basic leadership styles, they consist of: authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire. Leaders who utilize the authoritarian style of leadership give orders, are involved in most if not all decisions, and expect absolute adherence to their directives. Conversely, leaders who favor the laissez-faire style of leadership allow subordinates almost absolute freedom, giving little to no direction. Somewhere in the middle of these two styles, is the democratic style. Democratic leaders gather a consensus from their subordinates or constituents considering their opinions on an issue, before making a final decision on the issue.
The organizational factors include: flexibility, responsibility, standards, rewards, clarity, and commitment. The research shows that the coercive and pacesetting styles have a negative correlations on organizational climate while the other four styles have a positive impact. Thus, except for unusual circumstances where coercive and pacesetting styles might be appropriate, leaders should normally use a combination of the authoritative, affiliative, democratic and coaching styles to achieve success. The best leaders will sense from their emotional intelligence when to use each of these styles. If you are an aspiring leader or a leader who wants to get to the next level of leadership excellence, Goleman’s article is a great primer on how to effectively use different leadership
They refer to Fielder’s contingency theory, path-goal theory, Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership theory, and Vroom and Yetton’s normative decision model. Each theory is distinctive and different from each other. In the case of McDonald’s, it practices each theory to a certain degree. Fieldler’s contingency theory states that in order to maximize work group performance, leaders must be matched to the right leadership situation (Williams, 2007).
2.2 Different types of leadership styles Leadership plays a vital role in order for an organization to succeed, by effectively managing and controlling employees the type of leadership style. The most universal leadership styles concern transactional, transformational, laissez-faire, democratic and authoritative. These styles are widely applied in different organizations
Contingency theories put forth the idea that the success of a leader hinges on the specific situation at hand. A situation can be proven effective based on the leader or the leadership style attached. The factors that would determine this would include the task, the personality of the leader and the composition of the group that is meant to be led. Its basic assumption is that leadership-success or failure – is situational. There are a number of sub-theories that fall under the general contingency umbrella.
moreover, if a manager gets positive results from his leadership style he will be preferring to use that style in the future. Regardless of Leadership style certain types of leadership behavior can have a positive effect on an individual or group. Firstly, a leader must be dependable. If he possesses this behavior a team member will be more confident and trust him to do what they decide. Integrity is important behavioral trait which a leader should follow.
They suggested that the team management is the best as these leaders have both high consideration towards employees and high consideration towards products. Country club management leaders have high consideration for employees but low consideration for products while authoritarian leaders are just the opposite. Middle of the road leaders are moderate leaders while impoverished leaders are the weakest as they do not care about either employees or production! The last approach to leader centred leadership divides leadership into three types of styles- autocratic leaders, laisser faire leaders and democratic leaders. Autocratic leaders make decisions for the whole group.
The influence of the leader is based on the communication style with his/her followers and his/her capability of prediction, control, and planning. The behavioral approach has been criticized since it ignores the environment and the conditions, although it contributed significantly to the understanding of the leadership process. The biggest weakness is that the role of situational factors in determining the leader's effectiveness is ignored (Mullins, 1999) The biggest weakness is that the role of situational factors in determining the leader's effectiveness is ignored (Mullins, 1999).12
Out of those, leadership styles and contingency theories dominate the current literature on leadership. There are two major studies on leadership styles
To gain the organization’s objectives they sacrifice their personal life matters and promise to challenging goals. By giving clarification for the special effect some leaders have on professional engagement, team leadership, professional leadership behaviors, classroom leadership, steering the behavior of students, interpersonal skills and professional attitude, the theories seem to make an important influence to our understanding of leadership procedures. The newer theorists explain many positive sides of leadership styles but there are observed some conceptual weaknesses. The theoretical flaws in TL theory are studied first, followed by an examination of theoretical faults in charismatic leadership; situational leadership and democratic leadership theory. The researchers found the similar flaws as were mentioned in earlier styles, and they comprise unclear hypotheses, inadequate explanation of descriptive procedures, a little focus on dyadic procedures, exclusion of some significant actions, inadequate description of restraining circumstances (situational variables), and a partiality concerning heroic ideas of leadership.
According to Bauer and Erdogan (2010), we have Fiedler’s Contingency Theory, Situational Leadership, Path-Goal Theory of Leadership, and Vroom and Yetton’s Normative Decision Model. I will explain three of these theories one-by-one, then discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and then analyze how each fits with my personality traits and leadership method. Fiedler’s Contingency Theory is based upon the LPC scale of a person also known as the Least Preferred Coworker (Bauer & Erdogan, 2010). If you have a high LPC, that means you still think well of even the worst coworker you could imagine. If you have a low LPC, it means that you think that the coworker you would hate would also be a bad person.
If the behavior theory can identify the key determinants of leadership, people can actually train to become a leader. This is the premise of the management development plan. There are many different types of behavioural leadership styles. Each style suggests that the leadership role is based on the leaders’ concern for the people being led and the level of achievement that needs to be
Contingency Theories of Leadership Within the movie, some of the characters show qualities of leadership that can change depending on the situation and the environment. Especially notable, the whole aspect of Inception is its emphasis on the dream world in the environment of one’s subconscious. A theory that is expressed throughout the situations in the movie is the Path-Goal theory. This theory is described to possess a leader who helps their followers by removing obstacles for them and giving them the best route to opportunity.
- Relationship oriented leadership: in this type of leadership a leader takes input from all of his team member and then works accordingly with them. This type of leaders aims specifically to build a strong relation with their employs or team members. This results in high level of productivity and job satisfaction. Contingency theories: though trait and behavior theories help us in understanding leadership they miss an important part that is the environment in which leader exist. Contingency theory help us understand this aspect of leadership.