YuBin Park ANTH 0225A Professor Marybeth Nevins 05 April 2023 Decolonial Perspectives on Native American Civilizations Native Americans are a group with various dimensions to their identity and history, making it difficult for outsiders to completely comprehend how to “categorize” and “label” the individuals. In The People Named the Chippewa by Gerald Vizenor, the central focus is on the Chippewa people, also called Ojibwe or Anishinaabe), and the ways the group has been portrayed and referred to by people (usually colonists) who did not have a full understanding of their identity. In The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow, instead of focusing specifically on a group of Native Americans, they choose to speak on how small-scale …show more content…
The build up of these colonial stances and its subsequent mistreatments led to increased political, economic, and social challenges towards Indigenous communities, such as poverty and loss of land, that overall puts the Native Americans in a bad spot with less to no advantages at rebuilding these descriptions from European-centered writers. Unlike his derogatory language, James criticized “friend of the Indian” philanthropy for efforts attempting to “civilize” Native Americans and suggested listening and learning from the Indigenous communities instead. In the same line, Vizenor speaks on how the Federal Indian Policy should be created upon a foundation of respect to Native Americans’ histories and cultures molded by the insider experiences, eventually helping to provide an alternative approach that honors the Native American identity, unlike archival writings such as Captivity and Adventures of John Tanner (Vizenor, …show more content…
Edwin James, despite using inaccurate descriptors towards Native Americans, argues to treat them with respect to their own culture and identity. Graeber and Wengrow, even more broadly, speaks on how small-scale communities, in this case, Chippewa, are viewed as a product of minor development in a linear sequence compared to bigger communities, which are indeed untrue, all while suggesting that these small civilizations may have prospered through tight connections to other small communities around them. These three perspectives all provide a different understanding and translation of the piece of Captivity and Adventures of John Tanner, an archival piece that allows a glimpse at what European-centered writers in the past have collected upon observations and experiences regarding the Native
In the opinion piece “Save Wounded Knee” by Lakota American and New York Times writer Joseph Brings Plenty, Joseph makes many shocking points about life as a Native American today. Joseph argues that Native Americans have to fight to save their culture in today's society because of people auctioning off their land, poverty, and a forced assimilation. The purpose of Joseph writing this piece is mainly to raise awareness to activists about the horrible things that have happened in the past and that currently happen to Native Americans living on the reserve. Joseph points out how for native Americans it is very hard for them to keep their culture when their land is being auctioned off to the highest bidder, when the reserve they live on is riddled
Tension and tribulation between white settlers and Native Americans make up much of America’s early history. Two landmark events, The McGillivray Moment and Chief Joseph’s Surrender, provide a few similarities and differences, and changes and continuities of how American policies and ideas about Native Americans varied greatly as time progressed. During both The McGillivray Moment and Chief Joseph’s surrender, the American-made policies acted as nothing more than broken promises, and Native Americans were not seen as citizens of the United States; however, the policies concerning the forced migration of Native Americans were the opposite of each other, and the Creek nation chiefs were praised while the Nez Perce were punished. Throughout both
Similarly to what Brown does for our understanding of gender and power in colonial Virginia, Daniel Richter attempts to do by calling for a new perspective of Native American history with regards to westward expansion. In Facing East from Indian Country, he acknowledges how the difficulties presented by a lack of historical sources and distances of time make it impossible to see the world through the eyes of Native Americans. The best historians can do is to “capture something of how the past might have looked if we could observe it from Indian country.” Richter calls for researchers to break with tradition and examine colonization looking from the west to the east. In doing so, the author forces Native Americans to the front, and views Europeans
The three articles that are being discussed in this review are three about the foundations and stigmas of Jamestown. The First one is Capt. John Smith, Pocahontas and a Clash of Cultures: A case for the Ethnohistorical Perspective, by Author Michael J. Puglisi. Puglisi article is about the Natives at the time of Jamestown, and rather than being just victims, and passive bystanders to the Europeans, a new theory sees the Natives as direct participants with their own political agendas. The second work is The Civic Solution to the Crises of English Colonization, 1609-1625, by Andrew Fitzmaurice, who is Chief Executive Officer at
Simpson’s book tells the story of the Mohawks and their story of survivance amid the radical transformation brought about by settler colonialism. Her book discusses their struggle, fighting to keep their right to sovereignty as a Nation, separate from the US and Canada. Simpson illustrates the lives of the Mohawks in their reservation, and shows that they are more than the ironworkers that have come to be the stereotype for the Mohawk people. She argues that the Mohawks’ ongoing struggle proves that Settler Colonialism continues to exist, and continues to fail to eliminate and assimilate Indigenous people. Simpson begins by addressing the “question of membership,” that is, the criteria for political membership and formal recognition within
Hilary Weaver argues in her piece of writing; that identifying indigenous identity is complex, complicated, and hard to grasp when internalized oppression and colonization has turned Native Americans to criticize one another. Throughout the text, Weaver focuses on three main points which she calls, the three facets. Self-identification, community identification, and external identification are all important factors that make up Native American identity. The author uses a story she calls, “The Big game” to support her ideologies and arguments about the issue of identity. After reading the article, it’s important to realize that Native American’s must decide their own history and not leave that open for non-natives to write about.
Thesis: The English were a prideful group, entangled in ethnocentrism, that caused a condescending and harsh treatment of the Native Americans, while the Native Americans were actually a dynamic and superior society, which led to the resentment and strife between the groups. P1: English view of Native Americans in VA Even though the English were subordinates of the Powhatan, they disrespected him and his chiefdom due to their preconceived beliefs that they were inferior. “Although the Country people are very barbarous, yet have they amongst them such government...that would be counted very civil… [by having] a Monarchical government” (Smith 22). John Smith acknowledges the “very civil” government of the Natives but still disrespected them by calling them “very barbarous,” which
In the discussion of Native America, the representation of identity plays a large role in defining meaning to either a particular work or group. In the same way that we may look at ancient Roman architecture and attempt to construct an identity for a civilization and the individuals that made up that particular society. We use artifacts and art to help us define how groups of ancient civilizations looked and acted. The voices of these lost generations become lost or muted, as we as the viewers and interpreters are giving these objects meanings.
Merrell’s article proves the point that the lives of the Native Americans drastically changed just as the Europeans had. In order to survive, the Native Americans and Europeans had to work for the greater good. Throughout the article, these ideas are explained in more detail and uncover that the Indians were put into a new world just as the Europeans were, whether they wanted change or
In the book he explains how the abuse and trauma Native American people have suffered impacts the way that many people are today. Making them hate “power” and “weakness”, but also connecting them with one greater purpose; to
Losing one’s cultural knowledge, and therefore the reality of their culture, allows others to have control over their collective and individual consciousness as well as their destiny. In this case, it is clear that the United States government has had the dominant relationship over the Native
Throughout history, there have been many literary studies that focused on the culture and traditions of Native Americans. Native writers have worked painstakingly on tribal histories, and their works have made us realize that we have not learned the full story of the Native American tribes. Deborah Miranda has written a collective tribal memoir, “Bad Indians”, drawing on ancestral memory that revealed aspects of an indigenous worldview and contributed to update our understanding of the mission system, settler colonialism and histories of American Indians about how they underwent cruel violence and exploitation. Her memoir successfully addressed past grievances of colonialism and also recognized and honored indigenous knowledge and identity.
Science journalist, Charles C. Mann, had successfully achieved his argumentative purpose about the “Coming of Age in the Dawnland.” Mann’s overall purpose of writing this argumentative was to show readers that there’s more to than just being called or being stereotyped as a savage- a cynical being. These beings are stereotyped into being called Indians, or Native Americans (as they are shorthand names), but they would rather be identified by their own tribe name. Charles Mann had talked about only one person in general but others as well without naming them. Mann had talked about an Indian named Tisquantum, but he, himself, does not want to be recognized as one; to be more recognized as the “first and foremost as a citizen of Patuxet,”(Mann 24).
“Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress”, chapter one of “A People’s History of the United States”, written by professor and historian Howard Zinn, concentrates on a different perspective of major events in American history. It begins with the native Bahamian tribe of Arawaks welcoming the Spanish to their shores with gifts and kindness, only then for the reader to be disturbed by a log from Columbus himself – “They willingly traded everything they owned… They would make fine servants… With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.” (Zinn pg.1) In the work, Zinn continues explaining the unnecessary evils Columbus and his men committed unto the unsuspecting natives.
Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.