According to Samuel Clark’s argument, things exist the way they are in order to show the existence of God. All things need an explanation for their existence according to Aristotle. For instance, why the earth is spherical, why different places experience different climatic patters, why different geographical areas have different time zones and why do creatures that are in found in different places have features that enable them survive in such conditions. These considerations lead to a belief that there must be a cause for the universe (Rowe 67). At the same time, this cause needs to be extremely perfect for the universe to align itself in its current manner.
How it relates to the Pyramids of Egypt is a question? The Ancient Secrets of Kings of Egypt have always given importance with the Orion star cluster. The great Pyramids build in Egypt is also having the same astronomical precision on planet Earth. That is why these great Pyramids are still strong and not affected by any of the so far catastrophic events happened on planet Earth. The moon landing is also of such astronomical precision, based on the Orion Star cluster.
Copernicus contradicted Ptolemy’s ideas about the earth being the center of the universe because he made some research and found out that the sun was actually the center of the universe. He raised serious questions and he put Aristotle 's principle of existence to
Ptolemy described about the geocentric view (“geo” referring to Earth and “centric” meaning center”) in his book Almagest. In this piece of work, Ptolemy presented many convincing evidence, including the reason behind retrograde motion, or the backward motion of a planet as observed from a particular vantage point. (Text 2 by BHP). He proposed that epicycles, or planetary orbits, was the reason for
Descartes considers the light of nature to be absolute and without a doubt truthful. Two examples of causes and effects are if you smoke excessively, you increase the chances of being diagnosed with lung cancer and due to Sun’s gravitational pull, the planets orbit the sun. These examples support the idea of how the cause and effect correlate with one another in rational manner. Descartes cannot be the cause of the idea of God because the idea of God can only be created by an infinite being which is accepted by human consciousness. God is all powerful and knowing and thus is responsible for creating the perfect thought of his being.
Personally, I believe the conclusion of the transcendental argument for the existence of God. In my opinion, Immanuel Kant is more credible because he created the argument and supported it using many examples, whereas Michael Martin only found errors with the TAG. I agree with Kant because this theory is a cause and effect, meaning that God’s existence caused human reason. In Critique of Pure Reason, Kant states that logic originates from an individual’s belief in God. If someone believes that God created the world, then He is the reason why the laws of logic exist.
However, what we are evaluating now is just how gooodness takes place in the metaphor. In the allegory, the outside of the cave is the place where he reaches forms. The world of forms stands for reality in which everything is endless and perfect, whereas the cave represents just the copy of reality and all the things inside it changeable and imperfect. In the allegory, the concept of the good has its place in the centre of the metaphor. In order to explain the good, Plato uses the image of the Sun.
In Dante’s writing, there is clear evidence of a spherical Earth and a spherical universe. As regards the sun symbolism and Christ, Tolnay believed that it was based on age-old astral beliefs. As such, Tolnay dismissed the relevance of the Copernicus theory because of chronology, and the sun symbolism due to ancient astral
Answer: A conspiracy theory relies on wishful thinking, while a scientific theory relies on facts and evidence in regards to making a conclusion. PARAGRAPH 1 Source: The earth is a flat disk centered at the North Pole and bounded along its 'southern' edge by a wall of ice, with the sun, moon, planets, and stars only a few hundred miles above the surface of the earth. Paraphrase: According to Samuel Rowbotham (1800), The earth is flat. Rowbotham was inspired by the literal interpretation of the Judeo-Christian scripture, and so, in all possibilities, the ancient flat earth theory might actually be true and our modern understanding of astronomy might be false. Addition 1: This means that the scientific community and the authorities (e.g., government, scientists, media) have been lying to us the whole
The study of astronomy should remind us of the vast universe and the power of our Creator. All of these celestial bodies are controlled in an orderly manner and work harmoniously with each other. There is a flawless order which is very clear in proving the presence of a Creator who is all the time in control, directing and managing this entire
2- Belief in a created world. 3- Belief in a world designed by a wise and benign Creator. 4- Belief in the unique position of man in the creation. 5- Belief in the philosophy of essentialism. 6- Belief in an interpretation of the casual processes of nature as they had been elaborated by the physicists.
I think it is time to explain my theory in depth and why homology also supports my theory. The universal law of cause and effect states that for every effect there is a definite cause, likewise for every cause there is a definite effect. That being said, our universe had to have been an effect from a cause. A cause which I and most people believe to be the Big Bang but the Big Bang had to have have come from a cause also. I believe that God’s energy caused the Big Bang which create everything known.
What if it is all up to interpretation of the readings of both spirituality and math and science? Let’s consider Christianity as the spirituality and compare it to scientific facts. Corinthians 15:41 “There is one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for one star differs from another star in glory.” This explains that no star in space is alike which is scientifically true, one just has to be able to truthfully tie this quote in with facts. Yet another example of where the bible matches a scientifically correct fact, Job 26:7 “He stretches out the north over empty space; He hangs the earth on nothing.” This can explain the suspension of Earth in the sky as is “hangs on nothing”. Finally Jeremiah 31:35,36 “Thus says the LORD, Who gives the sun for a light by day, The ordinances of the moon and the stars for a light by night, Who disturbs the sea, And its waves roar(The LORD of hosts is His name):“ Which sights what we know to be true of space and Earth today.
A video of the moon landing, in addition to further geological evidence, has been collected and used as challenging points towards questioning its originality. As the current research stands, The Sister Theory is definitely the most scientifically realistic of the theories. The Sister Theory argues that, because ancestrally, lunar structures formulate in pairs (i.e.
A possibly omniscient being would be a reason to believe in fatalism because truth is timeless, as is their knowledge of the truth. Thirdly, To say that each event is determined by prior causes means that it was/is bound to happen. In Pierre Simon Laplace’s essay, A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities he says, “We may regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its past and the cause of its future. An intellect which at a certain moment would know all forces that set nature in motion, and all positions of all items of which nature is composed, if this intellect were also vast enough to