Deductive reasoning theory
Deductive reasoning theory is a process of thinking logically in which the result of the decision (or the conclusion) is based on the premises that are supposed to be true in general (Whatls.com, 2013). In other words, it is the truth in an idea of premises logically to insure the idea of conclusion, given that the conclusion has no doubt in the reasoning (William, 2006). The premise is a reasoning that is supposed to be true or commonly believed. For example:
(i) The earth is a planet;
(i) All planets orbit the sun;
(ii) Therefore earth orbits the sun.
This is because the premise of the earth is a planet and that all planets orbit the sun are the truth, for this reason the conclusion of the earth orbits the sun is necessarily true. The function of deductive reasoning works from general to more detailed. It operates equivalent with propositional calculus theory. Propositional calculus means, “the branch of logic that studies ways of joining and/or modifying entire propositions, statements or sentences to form more complicated propositions, statements or sentences, as well as the logical relationships and properties that are
…show more content…
Conversely, the rejection of a sure thing in favor of a gamble of lower or equal expected value (Pratt, 1964). In the other words, it is the tendency to avoid taking risks (Bernstein, 1996). In addition, this behavior of avoiding risk is sometimes called risk-seeking behavior (Kahneman & Tverksy, 1984). For instance, a person is given a choice between getting $100 in certainty and given a 50% chance of getting $200 or 50% chance of getting nothing. Applying the risk aversion theory, the person will probably choose the 100% chance of getting $100. This is because the person prefers to be secured and certain about what he is getting rather than taking the risk and facing
Chapter 5: Logical proofs teaches you about the different types of reasoning and examples
The third assumption being that natural events are caused by a natural phenomenon, you cannot just blame God or luck for things happening, and the last assumption stating that the simplest explanation that can explain the data is the best explanation to go with. While these assumptions are where scientists begin
Fairlie 's Fear of Living - She says that one pernicious moral effect of America 's growing fear of risk: a commensurate diminution of the notion of individual responsibility for one 's actions. 1. Fairlie criticizes the American population for failing to acknowledge the role of risks in their day to day activity 2. She says that the tolerable risk has be set so low that the nation is refusing to pay the inevitable cost of human endeavor.
However, those with a secure attachment style are highly invested in their relationships and tend to have long, stable ones that involve friendship, trust, and positivity (Hazan & Shaver,
Part B: Annotated Bibliography Article One: Why do hospitalized older adults take risks that may lead to falls? A study commenced by Terry. P.Haines recruited from Southern Health Hospital facilities, Victoria, Australia in 2009 between the months of March and June after receiving ethical approval from the Southern Health Human Research committee. The study aimed to identify factors and pathways explaining as why older adults take risks that may lead to falls in hospitalized setting.
The demarcation criteria are the set of requirements that determine whether or not a theory is considered scientific. Just as the theory can only be accepted using the current employed methods, the theory must also comply with the current explication of the demarcation criteria, which is that the theory must explain the generally known facts of its domain and be fundamentally falsifiable. This latter is explained using the concept of confirmation and disconfirmation reasoning, which in both cases, bases its predictions on theories. With that, in confirmation reasoning, when the prediction is proven to be correct, the theory is thus correct. Disconfirmation reasoning is when the prediction turns out to be wrong, then that is evidence against that theory.
We believe certain kind of information without truly have all the facts or all the information necessary to reach a conclusion. Some people reach their conclusion based on motivated reasoning. Even with all the “correct information” present they manage to come up with reasons and arguments that support their beliefs. Sometimes they use strategies to defend their point of
This is called the scientific method and has been used not only in fields of science but also in politics and government. Document three is a model of the scientific method from 1999. The model consists of the 7 steps of this process. One: state the problem, two: collect information, three: form a hypothesis, four: experiment, five: record and analyze data, six: state a conclusion, seven: repeat the steps. The method was built using logic and reason to get from one step to the next.
Social and environmental warriors are individuals who stand up for their beliefs through strife and dissension. Although on the surface it may not appear clear, but Christopher McCandless and Galileo Galilei are both warriors of their own right. These two historical figures have both left their impact on the world, even if they both accomplished that feat in seperate ways. McCandless and Galileo are both alike and contrasting in the fashion that they lived their lives.
Deductive gives audience general proposition, then draw a specific truth. The Rogerian Argument is more of a mediation approach, identifying the conflict, and finding common ground to create a solution. The Toulmin Model base argument on qualifiers and rebuttal. This argument approach is not to push absolutes, but to lead the reader to a realistic
Everyone takes risks. Some risks fail miserably, but some pay off in the long run. There are many risks that can be taken, each ranging from a little bit risky to highly risky. But, when all is done, risks need to be taken. Two pieces of writing, the chapter from Banner in the Sky by James Ramsey Ullman, “A Boy and a Man”, which is about a kid who risks his life to save a man in a crevasse who turns out to be a famous climber, and the poem “Risks” by Janet Rand, telling us all about different risks, share a similar theme.
B. Deductive Argument: Deductive logic can be used to discern cause and effect to predict likely outcomes for an event. C. Truth-preserving rule: The first two parts of a statement, if true, will lead to a conclusion that is also true. This is also known as valid rules. D. Premise: The first two supporting statements.
A good reasoning is a reasoning that leads to certain, true and valid conclusions. There are two kinds of reasoning, inductive and deductive reasoning. Both processes include the process of finding a conclusion from multiple premises although the way of approach may differ. Deductive reasoning uses general premises to make a specific conclusion; inductive reasoning uses specific premises to make a generalized conclusion. The two types of reasoning can be influenced by emotion in a different manner because of their different process to yield a conclusion.
Often one makes an ill advised decision to protect the ones that they love. In “Mama and Her Bank Account” it proclaims, “ ‘In all my life, I never been inside a Bank.’ And when I didn’t--couldn’t--answer; Mama earnestly said:’Is no good for little ones to be afraid--to not feel secure’”. One will often make a decision that others see as ill-mannered, in order to protect their loved one’s sense of security.
They don't believe they deserve what they want They're waiting for "the right time" Conflicting desires Fear that it will never happen if they try Fear that it won't live up to expectations