In Stoker’s novel Dracula, Renfield is a patient in Dr. Seward’s mental asylum who has a desire to gain the life of small, living organisms (e.g., flies, spiders, and rats) by consuming their souls. Although the purpose of Renfield’s character may be considered irrelevant to the central plot of Dracula, it is of utmost significance. To elaborate, the Renfield sub-plot functions as an “abstract representation for a better understanding” and in-depth knowledge to the character of Count Dracula through Renfield’s actions (Dracula). According to Gray, the character of Renfield “parallels aspects of Dracula 's livelihood,” such as his need to consume life. The dark relationship that Renfield and Dracula share is evident in the scene when Renfield
Lord of the Flies dates back to 1954 when a famous novelist, William Golding decided to write a book which could show an unusual version of the human beings. Born into an environment where his mother was a suffragette and later experiencing World War II where human ruthlessness was at its peak, made him better inclined in to writing a piece where he could explain his readers how human beings react in different situations. The setting of the novel depicts a situation where the human behavior is rational. The novel hence persuades the readers to realize the importance of ethics and civilization and how their absence can disrupt the society .Furthermore, the novel shows a negative aspect of the mankind and explains the reason it develops savagery
Intellectual discussions regarding the nature of good and evil have been the foundation of philosophical and literary reports for a number of centuries. No publication surmounts the captivation Shakespeare provides of this ongoing theme than Shakespeare’s, Macbeth. In Macbeth, Shakespeare replicates such themes present in other cultural narratives of the ongoing feuds between good and evil, such as the Genesis and Aztec creation myths, and philosopher Paul Ricoeur’s myth types. In the present essay, I will address Paul Ricoeur’s Symbolism of Evil to metaphorically anatomize significant passages within Macbeth to ultimately argue that Macbeth, although was capable of making his own decisions, was indeed affected by metaphysical forces.
"The Most Dangerous Game" presents a straight forward conflict between good and evil while "The Child by Tiger" gives the reader a far more subtle version of the conflict with good and evil on both sides. " The Most Dangerous Game" has a good and evil side also. The good is Rainsford. He is a hunter that fell off his boat and ended up on an island.
1. Mr. Utterson represents the perfect gentleman. He consistently seeks to maintain the peace, does not gossip, and protects his friends’ reputations as though they were his own. Even though he thinks his friend, Dr. Jekyll is being blackmailed or maybe even harboring a murderer, he chooses to sweep what he thinks he has learned under the rug. I think he is afraid he might ruin his good friend if he voices his thoughts.
Good and evil have been shown multiple times throughout the story. Beowulf versus all the different monsters throughout the story are the most prevalent examples of this dichotomy. Many of the evil forces were Cain, Grendel and his mother, and the dragon. These three portray evil in their fighting and their reasoning for fighting/ murdering others. Cain, the allegory, was evil for fighting out of anger and jealousy.
According to the Victorian Web, a new and budding author named Bram Stoker entered the world in the year 1847, on the eighth of November. From a young age, Stoker loved to read about folklore, and later on in life he aspired to be an author. Although Stoker published several stories, only in the year 1897 did he publish his most well-known novel, Dracula. After this success, Stoker went on to write several other novels, and eventually died in the year 1912. (Scarborough)
The line between good and evil is often blurred, even more so in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road. ‘The Road’ is a horrible beauty about a man and his son’s journey to the coast. In this post-apocalyptic world, everything that once was is no more and everything that was once known is questioned. Does the small difference between life and death tip the balance of good and evil? Can some evil doings be justified and even be considered as good?
Dariusz Sleszynski Mrs. Rafacz World literature Block 8 5 January 2016 Good vs evil Many characters convince others to make bad choices. We are all capable of doing good and bad things. Accordingly to the story Macbeth by William Shakespeare, at the beginning Macbeth is a heroic soldier but later on he turns out to be a tyrant.
The monster’s soul, designed to be human-like, corrupts as his acts of kindness are treated with hate and malice. In Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, the monster causes suffering and harm to others due to the injustice and harm inflicted upon the monster’s well intentioned actions. Since the monster’s creation, he isn’t guided through what is right or wrong, and his appearances prevent him from establishing rapport with other humans. When the monster tells Victor about his first feelings upon being created, he states “I saw, felt, heard, and smelt at the same time; and it was, indeed, a long time before I learned to distinguish between the operations of my various senses” (Shelley 70). The monster is similar to a child since