Oedipus Rex: Guilty or…Guilty?
Imagine the exact moment you realize your whole life has been a lie. Imagine the churning of your stomach as you discover you have done the unforgivable. Imagine realizing all the signs you ignored, all the clues you let pass by. Imagine when you realize it was all your fault. In the play Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, Oedipus, king of Thebes, is guilty of murdering the late king Laïos, despite the fact that he did not know he was his father. Oedipus was under a prophecy that said he would kill his father and sleep with his mother. Both came true, and he payed the price for it. He was banished from Thebes. Many have wondered if he really deserved this fate. Many say he is not guilty of killing his father, for he
…show more content…
But he still carelessly killed a stranger that could have easily been his father. Oedipus made the choice to kill Laïos, who to him was only a stranger, that day. It wasn’t because of his fate or the prophecy, as many have argued. With the little bit of control he had over his life he chose to commit this crime. It is known that Oedipus had suspicions about whether Polybos was his true father from this quote. “At a feast, a drunken man maundering in his cups/Cries out I am not my father’s son!.../the suspicion/Remained always aching in my mind,” (page 42). It was even more clear that he was suspicious when he told them he went to Delphi to ask God who his real father was. “I knew there was talk; I could not rest;/ And finally, saying nothing to my parents/I went to a shrine at Delphi.” But, “The god dismissed my question without reply;/He spoke of other things…/As, that I should lie with my mother… /And that I should be my father’s murderer” (page 42), Oedipus went on to say. So now it’s clear that Oedipus knew exactly what the prophecy was and that there was a risk that any random person could be his father, yet he killed a stranger soon after that! This was Oedipus’s choice, and a terrible one at that. Creon states this towards the end of the book when Oedipus tries to make commands again after being disgraced. “Think no …show more content…
Going back to the quote from earlier when he was confessing that he committed murder near the scene of Laïos’s murder to Iocaste, he said, “The groom leading these horses/ Forced me off the road at his lord’s command;/ But as this chariot lurched over towards me/ I struck him in my rage” (page 43). Forcing someone off the road is not a life threatening action, but striking someone is. He uses the word ‘struck’, a violent verb. He attacked them first, which means he has no grounds to claim self defense. One could claim that it was self defense because Oedipus later explains that Laios attacked him as well. “The old man saw me/And brought his double goad down upon my head/As I came abreast” (page 43). But it doesn’t matter that Laios fought back, because Oedipus struck
1. In Oedipus Rex, the audience already knows that Oedipus killed his father, the king. Oedipus himself is still trying to figure out who killed the king of Thebes but he doesn’t know that he is the one who killed the king until the very end of the play. We as an audience already know the prophecy foretells that Oedipus will kill his father and marry his mother. An ironic quote is “Then hear, I’ll not be proved a murderer.
When one considers that Oedipus’ actions involving his actual parents were unwitting it is easy to see that he is in fact innocent of a true crime and in classical scholar E. R. Dodds’ essay “On Misunderstanding the ‘Oedipus Rex’” he concludes that Oedipus is fundamentally innocent and states “I hope I have now disposed of the moralizing interpretation, which has been rightly abandoned by the great majority of contemporary scholars. To mention only recent works in English, the books of Whitman, Waldock, Letters, Ehrenberg, Knox, and Kirkwood, however much they differ on other points, all agree about the essential moral innocence of Oedipus.” and while details of these other scholars would take too long to explain in a simple essay it is agreeable that the thought of Oedipus’ misfortune being in punishment for unwittingly fulfilling his prophecy is false. However, the consideration that his misfortune is a result of his indifference is indeed a viable explanation and allows for the concept of Oedipus’ life being rectified if only he had listened to his
Oedipus Rex essay Final draft Oedipus certainly deserved his fate. Oedipus and his actions are clearly disrespect to the gods , he faces the fate he deserves. He was doing things that would eventually lead up to the unfortunate event of his death , he was even warned by the great and wise Teiresias , but he being himself was to stubborn and did not listen. All the things Teiresias said would happen became the truth. He killed his father, married his mother, yet he tempted his fate , he deserved everything that came his way .
This is first shown without Oedipus even being aware, when he kills Laius on the crossroads. He realizes later discussing the murder of Laius with Jocasta. Oedipus remembers, “I became angry and struck the coachman who was pushing me… and then I killed them all” (Sophocles 454). It did not take much to anger Oedipus into murder.
Although he was ashamed of the life he had been living, he realized that the mistakes were his own, and no one can bear the weight but him. He even said it himself “No one but me can bear this weight.” The grave consequences which Oedipus suffered in the end consisted of the loss of his mother/ wife by suicide, as well as his grief becoming a threat to himself, as he stabbed his own eyes out, blinding him permanently. After suffering dreadful pain from these actions in grief, Oedipus went on to face the other consequences given by the gods and Creon. He cursed himself many times in the book saying that whoever killed Laius should be banished or killed, and he would even go on to be cursed by his wrongful actions of incest.
Therefore, he will have to punish himself as he promised the people of the town. When Oedipus learns that he is the one who killed Laius, he is angry and unaccepting. He turns to blame the person closest to him, Creon, but, Tiresias says, “Creon is not your enemy. You are your own” (Episode 1).
He didn't know the truth about his life, his life and his actions were already predetermined, and he was just living life with curiosity. The first reason that hubris was not the reason Oedipus died was because he didn't know the truth of anything. He didn't know that he killed the king, let alone knew that Laius was his father. On page three Oedipus says “whoever he was that killed the king may readily wish to dispatch me with his murderous hand, so helping the dead king i help myself”(3).
And then I killed them all. (Lines 934-947) Commentary: In these lines it is revealed that Oedipus killed Laius on his way to Thebes. This is a matter of free will, as Oedipus couldn’t control his emotions when crossing to Thebes. Oedipus would have not killed his father if he didn’t let his anger overcome the best of him. Also it was a matter of free will, that Oedipus was traveling to Thebes as it was his decision to do so
Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen of the jury. I am the defense attorney for Oedipus in this case. The evidence that the prosecutor presented today showed Oedipus’ actions of incest and patricide; however, he had no choice in committing these sins. At the time of these actions, he did not know the identities of his real father or mother. We demand his innocence in the verdict.
The vagueness about Oedipus’ intellectual state can be interpreted as unconscious knowledge, which may make him morally culpable. Guilty
As seen through the murder of Oedipus’s father, he gives in to anger and kills the ‘stranger’. As the king of Thebes, he proclaims harsh punishment to the one who killed Laius and does not seem to be able to put two and two together to see his error. In comparison, Aristotle and Sophocles’s ideal hero comes from the superego and is represented by Theseus. While Theseus thrives and accepts the broken Oedipus, Oedipus would have shunned the killer of Laius (and did through asking Kreon to banish him). The id part of Oedipus’s unconscious directed his fate and, as a result, his
He told Tiresias that he was lying and was just trying to help Ceron become ruler. Oedipus also had too much pride this also contributed to his downfall. He was telling the people that they would find the murderer and have him exiled. He was too blind to see that he killed the king.
One of the prophets tell Oedipus that the killer is brother and father to his own children. Oedipus tells his wife that, at a young age, it was prophesize that he will kill his father and make children with his own mother. The prophets also said that he will kill his father. Oedipus was angered at these accusations and threaten the prophet with death. He utterly disgusted with these accusations that he enters starts to point the finger at everybody but himself. ”
First, he was blind to the truth about his own life. Oedipus had no idea that his real parents were Laius and Jocasta, he was so blind that he got mad at anyone that would even suggest an idea such as that. As the story went on though, Oedipus could no longer run from the truth; he was forced to open his eyes to the reality and truth of his life. Oedipus killed his father and married his mother; he is the brother to his own kids and the son of his own mother. Oedipus was the one that was causing all of the downfall and bad times in Thebes.
It is ironic how he talks about what could possibly be his own consequences for his actions. While giving the speech Oedipus says “I pray, too, that, if he should become an honoured guest in my own home and with my knowledge, I may suffer all those things I’ve just called down upon the killers” (Sophocles). Oedipus explains how the suspect will face bad things, and that if the murderer was let into his own house, with his knowledge, he shall be punished for it. The reader can infer that Oedipus may be the culprit considering he may ironically be the “honored guest in his own home.” This can seem like a reasonable outcome considering the reader knows that the position of a king is honorable.