Camryn Sharpe Mrs. Wenshau English 11 Block 4 3/10/23 The Consequences of Herd Mentality in The Crucible and in Modern Society The knowledge that one’s actions are their own is something that most desire and feel comforted by. Everyone wants to be able to think for themselves and form opinions based on their personal experiences and values, but that is not always the case. Many who find themselves caught in the snare of groupthink are blissfully unaware of their position. They believe that they are genuinely doing what is right, which can lead to loads of social issues caused by the adherence to ‘bad’ perceived opinions by ‘good’ people. Others affected by this psychological phenomenon know that what they’re doing is not necessarily ‘good’, …show more content…
The only real way to combat the negative effects of groupthink is to cast aside your surrounding society’s norms of what is ‘good’ and ‘bad’, and to take a personal stance against that society no matter what the cost may be. The Salem Witch Trials as represented in The Crucible by Arthur Miller are a perfect, if slightly extreme, example of what herd mentality can lead to if left long enough to fester and grow. John Proctor is the character who takes a stand against his surrounding society, losing his life in the process but also breaking the thrall of groupthink for the town of Salem, effectively setting them free from the Witch Trials. There are two main types of people affected by groupthink: those who unconsciously go with the crowd and are unaware, and those who are simply too scared to speak up. Unaware victims are the most dangerous type, especially when the crowd consists of mostly these people. Sometimes, it can be easier for someone to grasp onto one idea and stick with it firmly no matter what they learn, and to let others form opinions for them. This doesn’t require much thinking, which some are not very skilled in. These people are often outspoken in the group and like to claim authority. An example of this type of groupthink in …show more content…
Entrapment in herd mentality is a tricky thing. It is easily taken advantage of by self-centered people, it’s not always easy to identify, and it takes courage and personal sacrifice to break free. Usually it takes some sort of death, if not always in the literal sense. Death of reputation, death of friendships, death of social safety. This is true both in The Crucible and in modern-day real life, with the ‘herd’ being comparable to the government, society, corporations, religion, and more. Recognizing that one is participating in groupthink is the first step to getting out of it, and it’s always important to take a step back from any polarizing situations to assess how one really feels, and if their actions reflect their true opinions and morals. Everyone will find themselves in a herd mentality situation at some point in their lives. The true test is: will they find the courage to break free? Or will they sit idly by as injustice after injustice happens around them? That, of course, is for the individual to
In the play The Crucible, Arthur Miller utilizes the motif of mass hysteria. In the play townspeople panic about the accusation of people they know of being witches. In today's world we are surrounded by technology which allows news to travel fast. Recently, when a deadly disease called Ebola was found people began to panic and they were scared of being infected. The accusation of witches in the town and the Ebola found caused the same reaction in people.
Mass Hysteria In the book “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller, the characters were strong believers of witches and witchcraft. What started off as a little lie, grew way out of portion, which can be blamed on a few specific characters. They caused the death of many innocent people that were falsely accused of being witches/doing witchcraft and/or working with the devil. The first major one being Abigail, she single handedly made all of the children afraid to speak about what happened in the woods.
Valeria Santoyo Jan - 2023 Language Arts 11H P : 4 Conscious Avoidance in A Society Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible,” is a concrete example of characters not being able to see their faults because they have been blinded to the truth. “The Crucible” is a story that takes place in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692 during the notorious Salem Witch Trials. Throughout the story, Miller captures the trials and tribulations that the characters go through including a witch trial that sends these characters through continuous loop holes. The characters start to doubt everything and end up not being able to face the truth. This story illustrates the real life repercussions of a society being so drawn away from the real events they face because of the characters
Martian Luther King Jr. had people follow him to help get rid of racism. Adolf Hitler used groupthink by speaking to the crowd that didn’t like the Jews and thought that they didn’t have a reason to be on earth. He made people believe that was the right thing to do. David Koresh used groupthink by telling people he was the “Spiritual Heir” and people believed him so they thought it was the right thing. The adults that followed him had made their children follow him to.
In the face of death, people will do anything to get out of it. In The Crucible, the author, Arther Miller, demonstrates the story of the Salem witch trials in the 1890’s through a play. Of which the readers find that the trials originated from those who sought revenge upon others. As the people in Salem had fulfilled their hateful desires with an organized cry of witchcraft in court. Similarly, to when people accused others of communism, by naming names of those they didn’t like in the 1950’s.
Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible connects to the article Why Do People Follow The Crowd by ABC news by providing examples of how following the crowd can affect people. Just like in the Crucible, Miller displays how fear can cause people to follow and make bad decisions. The article and the play both show how following the crowd can cause adverse responses. A good example of this is in the Crucible, a girl named Abigail who spreads a rumor about witches in her town which then gives rise to the belief that there are witches in the town being controlled by the devil. In the Article the speaker describes an experiment by a scientist named Berns where he observes the reactions of his subjects.
Our minds, although sometimes we choose not to accept it, have a lot of control over our bodies and how they react to situations. Written in an article regarding the immigration ban, “Some of the people affected by the...order are facing... the possibility of death...”(Muscavage 1). Intolerance affects people in many ways, whether it be banning entry to a safer country or hanging people on the credibility of a rumour. Both hysteria and intolerance, themes seen in The Crucible, can be shown the same way now as they were in the play.
Know the dangers before you are herded into mob
This is how groupthink is displayed because as said in the text, it was impossible to not join in. The way people were supposed to act was already somehow planned into their brains. They weren’t
Thus this shows us how mob mentality is evident in the crucible and encompasses characters to turn from the truth and ends in the demise of the Salem Community. It is clear that mob mentality in “The Crucible” resulted in the
One Example of groupthink I read about is the "escalation of the Vietnam War”, 1. Summarize what happened (explain the event in your own words). In August 1964, two U.S. destroyers stationed in the Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnam radioed that North Vietnamese forces had fired them upon.
Have you ever been in so deep that the only way you could get out was to confess. Mass hysteria is a phenomenon that spreads fear among a group of people. In The Crucible, hysterical fear becomes an unconscious means of expressing the resentment and anger suppressed by strict Puritan society. Some citizens of Salem use the charge of witchcraft willfully and for personal gain, but most are overcome by the belief that the devil is attacking Salem. Danforth could have prevented Salem by realizing he was wrong and accepting the pleas and confessions of the innocent, This compares to the AIDs epidemic of the late 70’s and 80’s because everyone assumed without using facts.
We all know peer pressure can make you do things, But Arthur Miller’s The Crucible shows us the extremes of social pressure and how it can make us do things we would never have thought of doing. One of the major themes in The Crucible is that popular belief causes you to act and operate differently than you would normally. Some examples of this is Mary’s behavior, the girls fainting, and Proctors struggle to not confess. One of the main examples of someone giving in to social pressure is when Mary Warren decides to convict Proctor and say he is working with the devil.
When push comes to shove, everyone makes a tough decision, but in the end the decision was either out of fear to protect themselves, or a strategy to gain a designated amount of authority. In today 's society, many of the decisions people make lead to riots in the streets and people getting hurt. Similarly, the Ferguson riot in Missouri years ago, where many civilians were injured because of decisions made by everyone involved. Whether it turned violent because they wanted to prove something or because they feared the police when they showed up. In the story, The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, the characters also illustrate the fact that it is human nature to defend oneself, to strive to survive despite the harm such actions can cause to
It is a natural human instinct to want to be acknowledge by your peers, yet it is also important to be a critical thinker. Irving Janis in 1972 created the term groupthink. He believed groupthink occurs inside a group of similar people that want to keep from being different, resulting in incoherent decision-making. The 1957 film "12 Angry Men," uses groupthink, which influenced the verdict vote in the case of a teenager accused of murdering his father. The purpose of this essay is to examine groupthink and to represent Dr. Irving Janis’ symptoms of groupthink in the film.