Examples Of How Texting Is Wreckin While David Crystal
Texting, one of the newest forms of communication technology, has grown in popularity tremendously over the past ten years. Growing an astonishing 450% from 2006 to 2008 according to Neilson Mobile (Cnet). The text-language that has developed over that past ten years can easily cause a passionate difference of opinion. Many people embrace the texting shorthand, textese, while others refuse to abbreviate or shorten their messages, insisting to use full orthography. Throughout history there has been a fear that communication advancements, such as print, telegram, broadcasting and now text messaging, may cause harm to the language by dumbing it down. In “2b or Not 2b”, David Crystal disagrees with the idea that texting and texese will harm language as he addresses the counter argument and gives examples to support his idea that texting can be elegant and even poetic in a polite, explanative tone. David Crystal begins his essay with the negative views about texting. Using quotes from John Humphrys’ article “I h8 txt msgs: How texting is …show more content…
In “I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language”, John Humphrys compares texting to Genghis Khan, describing texting as “pillaging our punctuation, savaging our sentences, raping our language”. Crystal does not incite an argument, nor does he say Humphrys is wrong. But rather, politely provides information and examples to the audience to show that there may be another side to texting than Humphrys’ view. John Sutherland describes texting as “mental laziness” and “penmanship for illiterates”. These harsh words clearly express how passionately these two men dislike texting. But David Crystal uses no harsh wording in his essay, even though he disagrees with these two men. Keeping a polite tone to explain helps Crystal’s argument more than harsh words and anger would
Rhetorical Analysis Of Connie Parkinson's Represent Speech
476 Words | 2 PagesIn Connie Parkinson’s retirement speech, she takes advantage of her last moment as a teacher to warn us that we are losing our interpersonal connections. The culprit being cell phones. Through a laid-back style of speaking, Parkinson implores readers to acknowledge the harmful effects that come along with cell phone use. Passionate about her cause, Parkinson uses three different rhetorical devices to help get her message across: parallelism, syntax, and rhetorical questions. Examples of parallelism can be seen in a couple of different places.
Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr
739 Words | 3 PagesThese people say that technology allows us to access many sources of information at the touch of a button therefore gaining the ability to acquire greater amounts of knowledge without the superfluous details. Some even claim that technology allows us to reach our “ideal psychological state” through the stimulation short-term attention-grabbers on the internet (Anderson, “Just One More Game..”). It has even been claimed that texting “motivates students to write, practice” despite the fact that texting has detrimental effects on spelling, grammar and syntax (Cullington, “Does Texting Affect Writing?”). Socrates thought that with the development of writing, people would lose the knowledge they carried inside their heads. Socrates’ fears were proved to be unfounded though.
Summary Of Big Words Are Fading But Many People Still Love Them
591 Words | 3 PagesElizabeth Bernstein’s “Big Words are Fading, But Many People Still love Them” uses intentional diction and syntax to emphasize Bernstein’s bias. More specifically, colloquial diction, negative connotations, and various syntactic structures aid the author in achieving her purpose. Bernstein effectively conveys her meaning through the use of varied diction. Her ultimate bias is technology’s hinderance on people’s everyday vocabulary, and her love for big words suggests disapproval in their gradual disappearance.
Does Texting Affect Writing Michaela Cullington Analysis
697 Words | 3 PagesIn her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.
Who Owns Global English? By Dennis Baron
367 Words | 2 PagesIn Dennis Baron’s article, “Who Owns Global English?”, the author addresses the way English is being adapted around the world as well as why some countries wish to put a stop to it. This is centrally focused around a campaign for Spanish-English schools in Madrid hosting the slogan “yes, we want.” All languages change as the number of speakers grows; the English language is no different. Baron provides several examples of this growth from “Engrish” to slogans such as the one used in Madrid (36). Most notably however the author talks about the different kinds of English already in existence.
Analysis Of Twob Or Not 2b By David Crystal
199 Words | 1 Pages“2b or Not 2b” written by David Crystal first grabs the reader 's attention using emotional appeal by introducing the opposing argument and using vivid imagery in his selected quotes. The opposition is introduced through a counter-piece written by John Humphrys titled “I h8 txt msgs.” Crystal employs a black-or-white fallacy in this piece as he explains how the opposition views texting as “raping our vocabulary” and his position on the matter as “beneficial.” Crystal presented a clear claim: texting provides users freedom to use their creativity and it the the gateway to the newest evolutionary shift in language. Unfortunately Crystal focused all his energy on one extreme or the other and failed to touch on the grey middle ground that comes
Does Texting Affect Writing By Michaela Cullington
1012 Words | 5 PagesMichaela Cullington was a former student at University in Pennsylvania when she wrote the essay of “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Have you ever thought if texting truly effects our writing style when it comes to college levels? Cullington did research of her own from different people group asking this question. Her thesis sentence was “IT TAKES OVER OUR LIVES” (…). The way that she capitalized all the letters is something that can engage the reader and the curiosity of knowing what is taking our lives?
Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr
1060 Words | 5 PagesIn Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, the author claims that the Internet is changing for the worse the way we communicate and retain our messages. Carr states that in 1882, a man with failing vision bought a typewriter, and in using this device his style of communication changed dramatically. Carr is correct that technology is changing the way we as humans process information and communicate our messages, but the Internet is just the natural next stage in this development. All communication starts a message, but a message requires some form of a language, be it through voice, hand signals, pictures, electronic transmission, or writing. Throughout history communication has changed with the advent of new technologies as mankind continues to develop new ways to send more complex messages farther, faster, and more efficiently, while a message can now be anything from a simple greeting to the complete Wikipedia database or beyond.
Does Texting Affect Writing? By Michaela Cullington
944 Words | 4 PagesIn her essay “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Michaela Cullington addresses the issue of text messaging possibly causing poor communication skills and the use of textspeak, abbreviations used during text messaging such as “LOL” and “g2g,” in students’ formal writing. Cullington argues that “texting actually has a minimal effect on student writing” (pg. 367). She addresses the opposition directly, even citing credible sources. However, she also cites credible sources with better information to support her point, and even conducts an experiment of her own.
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Should Everybody Write By Dennis Baron
886 Words | 4 Pages“Should everybody write” is the question that is argued throughout the article Should Everybody Write by Dennis Baron. Baron, an English professor at the University of Illinois, incorporates essay styled writings in correspondence to English problems faced in today’s world. His main concern in this essay is to demonstrate to his audience a proper answer to the argued statement and uses rhetorical strategies throughout his article to support his claims. The use of tone is incorporated when he discusses the context of writing history. His purpose in this article is discussed using his strong sense of logic and he also conveys to his audience’s emotions to caution them on their own writing or writing fears.
Andrea Lunsford's Our Semi-Literate Youth? Not So Fast
872 Words | 4 PagesNot So Fast” Andrea Lunsford researched students’ writing for 30-plus years to see what effect new technology has on how students learn. Lunsford discovered that students are actually improving their own writing skills with the help of mass media. Not only does it allow students more access to educational resources and information, but it also encourages students to do more creative thinking and writing outside of class which Lunsford refers to in her article as “life writing.” In her research she recalls the account of a student who sent a friend a text message which was completely informal and would be considered unprofessional by most piers. However, the same student also sent a very formal and professional report to her faculty adviser later on.
Lack Of Interpersonal Communication
906 Words | 4 PagesDating back to 1992, the first text message was sent, "Merry Christmas", it said (Williams). While purpose behind the message was to reach a large group of coworkers in a short period of time, it has now elevated the common conversations. As a result of that simple message, we have created text messaging that have taken the place of face-to-face conversations between family, friends, associates, doctors and patients, teachers and students, and etc. According to a Forbes article, "This generation grew up with the gradual introduction of instant messaging, texting, email, and other forms of written communication.
Examples Of Social Commentary Fahrenheit 451
553 Words | 3 PagesIn today's society, technology has taken over. Texting is believed to have been destroying social skills and a majority of people are constantly on social media broadcasting their lives. Ray Bradbury presents technology as only being something that eliminates personality but many improvements have also been made in the world
Analysis Of The Judgement Of Thamus
1009 Words | 5 PagesText messaging allows people to send messages to anyone in the world quick and simple, but it 's only temporary. In other words, sending a text can be effortlessly erased. Postman believes that new technology such as text messaging is a blessing and a burden, meaning that there are many advantages as well as disadvantages. Furthermore, he also believes that every new technology will replace the old. In other words, new technology such as messaging on cellular devices has replaced writing letters to people as a way to communicate.
Comparison Of Intimacy Behavior
3361 Words | 14 PagesComparison of Text Messaging Behavior and Intimacy Behavior between American and Filipino Citizens Jeff Llanes Eva Castronuevo Texting is the easiest way of communication today. Just like what Bill O’Reilly said “Texting is addicting. Once you get emotionally involved with constant outside stimulation assaulting your brain, it is hard to stop looking at your machine every two minutes. Without rapid fire words appearing on a screen, you feel bored, not part of the action.” From the simplest type of mobile phone to the latest smartphones, people can send a text message to anyone, anywhere and anytime.
More about Examples Of How Texting Is Wreckin While David Crystal
Rhetorical Analysis Of Connie Parkinson's Represent Speech
476 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr
739 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Big Words Are Fading But Many People Still Love Them
591 Words | 3 PagesDoes Texting Affect Writing Michaela Cullington Analysis
697 Words | 3 PagesWho Owns Global English? By Dennis Baron
367 Words | 2 PagesAnalysis Of Twob Or Not 2b By David Crystal
199 Words | 1 PagesDoes Texting Affect Writing By Michaela Cullington
1012 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr
1060 Words | 5 PagesDoes Texting Affect Writing? By Michaela Cullington
944 Words | 4 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Should Everybody Write By Dennis Baron
886 Words | 4 PagesAndrea Lunsford's Our Semi-Literate Youth? Not So Fast
872 Words | 4 PagesLack Of Interpersonal Communication
906 Words | 4 PagesExamples Of Social Commentary Fahrenheit 451
553 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of The Judgement Of Thamus
1009 Words | 5 PagesComparison Of Intimacy Behavior
3361 Words | 14 Pages