When faced with injustice, one would assume that the right thing to do would be to defy it. However, as seen in The Crucible, this is not always the case. Characters both challenge and agree with the injustice, when they are faced with the highly prejudiced court and witch trials, for many different reasons. In Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible, he persuades readers to both accept and challenge the view that “Defiance becomes our duty in the face of injustice” through the ironic use of both static and dynamic character’s personal integrity. When faced with the unjust court of Salem, dynamic characters do what is expected, defy the injustice. Reverend Hale is one example of a character who defies the court, going from “No man may longer doubt …show more content…
There is too much evidence now to deny it” to “I denounce these proceedings, I quit this court!” (Miller 61; 111). Hales starts the story off fully with the court, then as he relizes how corrupt it is, literally goes on to “denounce” it (111). Brilliantly, Hale makes the switch from agreeing to defying the court as a dynamic character, so he overcomes his prestigious schooling and knowledge to do what he believes is right. Proctor, the main defier of the court, also is a dynamic character. He didn’t agree with the court from the start, but makes his switch when he realizes that it is his duty to save the town by first saying “ I say - I say - God is dead!” then eventually confessing himself to the crime of witchery, which he did not commit, and not accusing anyone else (111). Yet, when Proctor is asked to sign his name, he refuses, instead saying “ Damn the village! I …show more content…
However there are two static characters who challenge this idea, Giles Corey and Rebecca Nurse, as they both are static, yet challenge the court. However, they are both doing this to protect only their own personal integrity, in comparison to Proctor and Hale defying to protect the town. In Giles case he is the scapegoat of the town, so he always defends himself, while Rebecca has always been one of the most respected people in Salem. To defend herself, Rebecca, in response to Proctor’s confession says “Why, it is a lie, it is a lie; how may I damn myself? I cannot, I cannot” (129). When she says this, she is protecting herself, but not influencing anyone else, and Giles, while he defended himself until the bitter end, did not have any real influence on anyone either. These static, yet defying characters further develop the overall message Miller is trying to portray; a dynamic, influential, self-righteous, character will challenge injustice, while a static, only influential in the ways of hysteria, and most importantly dishonorable person will agree with injustice. These ideas connect back to the quote “Defiance becomes our duty in the face of injustice”, because when faced with injustice, a morally correct person will challenge it, while a morally corrupt person will agree with it. Yet, as seen in the play, the
Moreover, as Hale remains hidden from reality, blinded by the witch-identifying doctrines he is so well-versed in, his authority over others prevails. Attempting to discover witchcraft in the Proctor abode, Hale questions the couple’s Christian character, asking why they “are so absent” in church (64) and of their children, why “only two are baptized” (65). Following this line of reasoning, Hale is only able to think through the lens of his books, without any attention to the big picture of the trials. Moreover, Hale’s blind obedience carries on, as his teachings lead him to believe the Proctors are guilty, leading him to present this to the court under his existing
Human is a species that live in group, and conformity is one of the distinct characteristic of human nature. In the play The Crucible, Arthur Miller investigates various natures in community throughout Act 1 and 2. The play took place at Salem, a town that primarily based on puritanism, the major plot of this play is about witchcraft and witch hunt. Miller conveys a essential message of people always search for conformity from society as a form to prove their identity, further, any rebellion would consider as outcast from majority. The author explores the theme by the use of conflict, this literary element best demonstrates changes of characterizations and complication between others and internal struggle.
Hale no longer believes in the witch trials. Everything Reverend Hale came to Salem for now no longer means anything to him. By this point Reverend Hale, among others, has become fed up with the pretense and falseness of ‘The Salem Witch Trials’ and wants nothing more than for it to be over. (page 84, act four, Miller, Arthur The Crucible: A Play in Four Acts, Viking Press 1953) “ HALE, quickly to Danforth: Excellency, it is enough he confess himself. Let him sign it, let him sign it.”
Hale says to Danforth, “Excellency, I have signed seventy-two death warrants; I am a minister of the Lord, and I dare not take a life without there be a proof so immaculate no slightest qualm of conscience may doubt it” (The Crucible pg 184). At this point in the play, John Hale has a new perspective on the situation occurring in Salem. He realizes by starting the witch trials, he encouraged the accusation and death of innocent people. Hale feels guilty for the lives he ended and begins his new mission of saving
Hale’s shift of mindset also symbolizes the change that the community of Salem went through. In the beginning, Hale was blinded by his faith in the Church and followed the court, however as the play progressed, Hale started to doubt the
Society has always perpetuated a firm distinction between that perceived as “good” and that of “evil.” Human nature, however, does not function in terms of absolutes such as these. As a way to attempt reconciliation between these seemingly paradoxical statements, art and literature have developed into mediums which have made the study of morality accessible. Because of this direct connection, Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible can be seen as an exploration into the human psyche. Within the drama, Miller succeeds in juxtaposing the role of the “saint” with that of the “sinner,” thus returning to the basic, human debate between righteousness and corruption. While many, if not all, of the characters display some level of this conflict, the
Towards the end, Hale changes from a person who carries his heavy written laws to a person who hates the court. During Act III, after Danforth arrested Proctor, Hale is so angry with the court that he yells, "I denounce these proceedings, I quit this court!” (Act 3, 120). The quote might seem really simple, but it is significant because Hale finally figures out that the court system is a failure to the society, and also figures out what he should be go after. As a result in Act 4 when Hale tries to convince Elizabeth to tell Proctor to confess, Hale says, “‘Beware, Goody Proctor cleave to no faith when faith brings blood.
As Bob Marley once said, “The greatness of a man is not in how much wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and his ability to affect those around him positively.” Integrity is the quality of being honest and upholding one’s morals and principles. Living in a fast-paced and ever-changing society, human beings have come into contact with adversity and hardship all throughout history. Those who act with integrity during tough times have a major influence on those around them, and taking a stand and upholding ones’ beliefs and morals at great self sacrifice can inspire and encourage others to do the same. Arthur Miller’s 1953 play, The Crucible is a prime example of upholding integrity, and the characters within the play face difficult choices between doing
However, as he discovers more about the accused themselves, Hale begins to doubt his initial judgment, and questions the competency of the court in honestly assessing the witch trials. Yet, in fear of choosing a side, Hale becomes tactfully neutral and desperate for the truth, as he advocates for “proof so immaculate” that the verdict would be just and indelible (188). His logical and analytical nature lends him towards Proctor’s argument, but he is compelled to stay firm with the law, especially as Danforth and Parris challenge his loyalty throughout the case. During the trials, the Reverend experiences a foreboding guilt for the first time, as he recognizes his culpability in the lives that he may have incorrectly denounced. Although he has the power to defend his conscience, his religious duty and responsibilities towards the court
condemned for their attempt, mostly due to the section in Revelations in the Bible that states that there are witches, and that all witches must not live. The accused that do not admit are hung since they are basically going against the word of God that there are no witches. The fact that innocent people are dying for reasons the bible tries to prove reasonable when it is clearly not gives Hale a good enough reason to quit the court. He wants no part of a court that kills innocent people unlike Reverend Parris, who is more worried about his own reputation instead of innocent people’s necks breaking by the noose. He does not want to work with judges that cannot see that people are admitting to something they didn’t do just to save their own
In the beginning acts, Hale was trusting the court more than John and was a big part of handling warrants of the accused individuals along with having much confidence in himself, his knowledge of witchcraft, and knowledge of witches in Salem. In Act 2 and 3 in the play, The Crucible by Arthur Miller, the character Reverend Hale was changing a lot. Throughout the first act of this play Reverend Hale had much of his trust in the court and fully believed the devil is in Salem but as the trial begins and goes on things start to change when Hale starts to question the court shown when he pleads
The witches are on the hunt for the innocent souls of Salem with Hale stating, “The Devil is alive in Salem, and we dare not quail to follow wherever the accusing finger points” (Miller 1251). Hale is determined to use God’s mighty hand against the “evil witches”. This shows that Hale is faithful to Abigail’s accusations against the common people of Salem. At first, Reverend Hale is eager to prosecute, but as more innocent people are condemned, his compliance turns into distaste. His dissatisfaction eventually turns into rage when Hale shouts, “I denounce these proceedings!”
Reverend Hale, from the play The Crucible, is a dynamic character who was involved in determining the guilt of convicted witches in the Salem Witch Trials. The Crucible, a play by Arthur Miller is based on the true events that occurred in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1953. Reverend Hale enters Salem with the assumption that there is witchcraft in the colony due to many unexplained events. Hale's character change can be traced in events that occurred throughout the story. He seeks to convict and condemn the witches in the beginning of the play, but by the end, he realizes the corruption of Salem in the convectors, judges, and witnesses and seeks to change the fate of the accused.
In our society, many people rely on the power of law and justice in order to protect themselves. Some powerful men abuse and misuse their power which brings many unfairnesses and tragedies. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, Judge Danforth is a deputy governor of the state, and he is also the judge for the witchcraft trail. Judge Danforth represents the authority and supremacy in the entire play. Throughout the play, Danforth’s tyrannous and stubborn personality caused many wrong decisions that he made in the court.
In Arthur Miller’s dramatic play The Crucible, John Proctor, the protagonist, symbolized truth and justice by displaying honor and pride in his name. The change in balance between those two attributes acted as a catalyst in defining moments of the play. In the beginning, Proctor equally reflected both pride and honor in separate events. However, when forced to make a decision, he chose honor over pride. Ultimately, both his honor and pride pushed him to commit the ultimate sacrifice.