“Ethical issues in marketing of Children an Utilitarian perspective.” Introduction Meaning and Definition The word “ethics” is extracted from the Greek word “ethos”, which refers to the nature, guiding values, principles or ideals that are spread through a group, community or people. Each and every individual is responsible to his community for his behaviour. Ethics is group of norms, or code, or value system, devised from human reason and experience, through which free human actions are determined as right or wrong. According to the Josephson Institute, “Ethics is defined as standards of conduct that indicate how one should behave based on moral duties and virtues”. According to Webster, “Ethics is the discipline dealing with what is …show more content…
Like several authors, Beauchamp (1980) divides the major philosophical trends in ethics into two large categories: the utilitarian approach and the deontological approach. Under the utilitarian approach, the notion of ethics is closely related to the consequences of an action. According to this approach, the manager will attempt to produce the greatest possible amount of positive value or the smallest possible amount of negative value for the persons affected. In opposition, the deontological approach, largely based on the work of the philosopher Emmanuel Kant, considers not so much the consequences of an act as the manner in which the act is performed. This approach is based on the notion of categorical imperatives and, consequently, is more normative in nature. For Kant, a course of action is not ethical unless the person who adopts it would see nothing reprehensible in its adoption by all others and unless this practice does not threaten the survival of society. Following this logic, lying or stealing are unethical practices, no matter what their consequences. In other words, in deontology, one cannot assume that the end justifies the …show more content…
The most striking feature of this definition is its almost entirely utilitarian aspect. This characteristic is typical of marketing whose central theme, ever since its very first definitions, has been the satisfaction of the needs of consumers. Now, since the satisfaction of consumers’ needs is the final objective of marketing, one would be inclined to believe that the ethical approach which dominates is, for the most part, utilitarian. Furthermore, since the satisfaction of the needs of one’s fellow man is in itself a practically indisputable ideal, marketing people tend perhaps to concern them less with the way in which this ideal is attained, thereby neglecting the deontological aspect of their
In sum, utilitarianism is attempting to do the greatest good for the greatest number of people (Johnson, 2019). The acts of deceit, disregard, and selfishness only benefited Beau’s Tuxedos with the possibility to have negative consequences for both the consumer and the business. Each instance of unethical behavior that was brought to light resulted in a poor customer experience. Americans say they tell an average of nine people about good experiences, and nearly twice as many (16 people) about poor ones, making individual service interaction important for businesses (2011). This is important to note as the unethical behavior displayed did have the potential to cause both good and bad consequences for Beau’s Tuxedos.
Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative and John Stuart Mill’s view of utilitarianism are two very different approaches to ethics and morals. In fact, they are the opposite of one another. Kant’s view of ethics is an ethics of pure reason- a deontological theory of ethics. He stresses that feelings and emotions should have no part in ethics because they are unreliable, changeable, and uncertain. He states that ethical principles must be universal and that ethics are distinctively human.
Deontology which is derived from the Greek words Deon (meaning obligation/duty) and logia (science/study) combined to be also known as duty or rule-based ethics or the study of duties or obligations. It is a branch of ethical theories that deals with ethics of conduct, which theories are based on the sort of actions people must perform. It is based on non-consequentialism where the ends do not justify the means and thus deontology is an approach to ethics in which a sense of duty or principle prescribes the ethical decision (Preston, 2007). Deontology affirms duties must be obeyed regardless of the consequences. The theory of Deontology has its flaws as well and this essay will present three criticisms of deontology namely that deontology relies on moral absolutes, allows acts that make the world a worse place, two permissible duties that are right can conflict with each other and will demonstrate these flaws with relevant case studies and dilemmas.
Decisions about right and wrong fill each and every day. Turmoil exists due to deciding if Deontology, where one acts based on the right motives, or if Utilitarianism, where one should act in a way that would produce the best results and consequences, should govern decisions and their morality. However, I believe Deontology, which is reason and duty based, serves as the superior way to dictate morality. In this paper, I will explain both the principles of Deontology and Utilitarianism, discuss the superior aspects of Deontology as compared to Utilitarianism, as well as grapple with objections to Deontology. While both ethical frameworks contain parts of ideologies that could be seen as valid, Kant’s theory on Deontology holistically remains
Ethics modify how you act on a day to day basis. They are standards that should be followed, but are not always followed. An example of ethics not being used is Charlie Gordon and his operation in the short story "Flowers for Algernon". Charlie Gordon wasn't necessarily bright. He had an I.Q. of 68 and struggled with things such as reading, writing, and math.
Ethics plays an integral role in promoting the well being of individuals in the society. Early scholars, though with different perceptions of the idea, emphasized the need for an ethical based community or society. Each community has various ethical guidelines, which its members are supported to follow. The same actually applies for organizations, whether public or privately owned. This demonstrates that the idea of ethics is homogeneous and that provides the optimum level where behavior, whether individual or institutional, can be regarded as right and not in violation of societal norms or organizational expectations.
Commonly, ethical systems are categorized into two major systems. The deontological approaches or normative ethical position which judges an action based on the adherence of the action to certain rules and the teleological approaches which judges primarily based on the consequences of an action (Hare, 1964). The Utilitarianism is assigned to the teleological approaches, as it does not evaluate an action by itself but by it’s
Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.
In this essay, I compared Utilitarianism and Deontology, and argued that Deontology is a better ethics system than Utilitarianism because, while Utilitarianism focuses solely on results, Deontology considers humans as more than just a means to an end and provides for a system of generally accepted
Deontology is contrasted with teology, which maintains that the rightness or wrongness of acts depends solely on ends or consequences. For deontologists, moral law is not defined by consequences, unlike that of egoism and utilitarian theory; instead, moral law is an end itself. There are four levels of deontological theory namely, basic-principle deontology, general-principle deontology, rule deontology and act deontology. Basic-principle deontology deals with logical priority to basic, fundamental, or ultimate principles. One known proponent of such level is Immanuel Kant, who gave rise to some of the most influential philosophy in Western history.
The issue is imperative to the modern day society since it focuses on the problems faced by societies in the current times. Marketing is said to be the cause of all these issues. Companies must therefore recognize the need of responsible marketing and how it helps solve these
Generally, ethics is defined as the rule for carrying out certain behaviors by distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable behavior (Resnik, 2015). In other words, ethics assists in determining whether a decision is right or wrong when given a choice. As a matter of course, decision-making is first predisposed by personal ethic that is constructed on personal experience and conscience (Fritzsche & Oz, 2007) . It tends to be affected by family and friends (Ferrell & Gresham, 1985). Not only does personal ethics guide human behavior but also social ethics (Shaw, 2002).
Introduction The key ethical issues that were presented in this case study were quality control, lack of customer care, responsiveness, and harming the customer. The Johnson and Johnson case may have been seen as a turning point due to many things the company did right. However, there were many ethical issues in this case which will be explored more throughout this paper.
Introduction Globalization is a fact of Economic Life – Carlos Salinas De Gortari. Globalization is not a new thought. This process of interaction and integration among the companies, people and government of different countries is happening from ages. Technology has been the major driver of globalization. Economic life has been transformed dramatically by the advances in information technology.
Merriam-Webster dictionary defines ethics as, “the discipline dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation.” Righteousness and virtuous are a few words I would use to define the term ethics. But where do our ethics truly arise from? From birth, we begin to learn things from our homes and community that shapes the way we view things. The cycle of socialization as describe by Bobbie Harro in Readings for Diversity and Social Justice plays a huge role in determining what values and ethics we carry on throughout our lifetime.