1. Natural Enemies – Metaphor or Misconception? (2003)
2. Summary: At the beginning of the piece, the author's use an example to showcase how metaphors in science, when taken literally, can greatly influence how the subject of the metaphor is interpreted. Specifically in the case of the “Frankenfish” found in Maryland. They make the point that metaphors are found everywhere in science, and that its use is for clarity in discussion and understanding. The unfortunate case although, is that definitions of metaphors in science are being misinterpreted, as seen with the phrase “survival of the fittest,” and misappropriated, as shown with the development of eugenics from genetics.
On the other hand, the authors describe how metaphor has assisted
…show more content…
They are now integral in scientific discourse. Their original terms and meanings are lost except to those that know where to look for them. Scientific literature, as the quote alludes, is publications, journals and whole books of original research or theory concerning the natural and social sciences. Scientific theory is what scientific literature explains and shows to its audience; it is a widely excepted explanation of a facet of the natural world based no facts and often times experiments. After the point from which metaphors are not longer recognized as metaphor, the metaphors begin to be used in place of the actual name of the process of the relationship. The relationship instead of being recognized as a form of a symbiotic relationship, lets say predation, they don't know the term itself, but they recognize the two species in the sort of relationship as “natural enemies.” Most humans are scared of lions, tigers, and bears, but lack the knowledge of much about those animals. This is largely sue to the fact that they do not understand how metaphors influence how the public interprets these creatures. They yes are deadly to their prey, but they are not our “natural enemy,” they are in fact beautiful creatures that deserve respect and protection from those that wish to harm them from their misconceptions from the well know phrases like: “lions, tigers and bears! Oh
Through the use of anaphora, metaphor, and informative figurative language, Barry portrays the work of a scientist as challenging and complex. Barry begins by using patterns of repetition and anaphora in the first paragraph. He does this to strengthen the traditional recognition that certainty is good and uncertainty is bad. Providing these antithetical concepts of uncertainty v. certainty, or good v. bad, also strengthen his claim that the work of a scientist is challenging and complex. Next, Barry complicates our understanding of the nature of scientific research through the use of metaphor throughout the essay.
Gould utilizes logos in order to show how and why testable hypotheses are what makes good science. In doing this, he directly achieved his purpose. Aside from being at times satirical or even condescending, Gould’s use of any other rhetorical devices is minimal at best. This not only keeps his article very straightforward, but highlights his satirical moments and portrays the article as being fueled by knowledge and conclusive evidence. Gould’s near exclusive use of logos makes it the center of gravity for his article, and provides validity to his conclusions of what does and does not make fruitful
Although some may think of metaphor as ornamental and inapplicable for use in subjects other than English literature, metaphors are necessary for communication in all fields. The use of metaphor is especially crucial in the field of education, where students cannot be taught without the use of metaphor because one cannot understand completely new ideas without making a connection to previously known information (Reddy). Textbooks readily employ metaphor in order to convey new information to students. Pages 28-29 of The Primate Family Tree by Ian Redmond illustrates the evolution of primates through a diagram of a tree and describes how the theory of evolution has changed since the nineteenth century. The Primate Family Tree willfully utilizes
In most stores that people read, they never notice metaphoric language. Readers may think that it is just a weird way to say something, but most metaphors have meanings. If readers pay more attention to this element it makes the story more interesting to read. Once someone reads while identifying metaphoric language, they will never stop. The authors of the two stories “The Long Rain” and “Harrison Bergeron” used metaphoric language to shape the mood and dominant themes of the stories.
Another example of metaphors in
A metaphor is a forthright correlation between two dissimilar things. A metaphor is used to say one thing while meaning another to symbolize the true meaning. In the story “The Skating Party” Merna Summers uses the metaphor “I’m not going to be your window blind” (195), this is a good metaphor because window
Metaphors are an influential piece to the literary world due to, “the process of using symbols to know reality occurs”, stated by rhetoric Sonja Foss in Metaphoric Criticism. The significance of this, implies metaphors are “central to thought and to our knowledge and expectation of reality” (Foss 188). Although others may see metaphors as a difficult expression. Metaphors provide the ability to view a specific content and relate to connect with involvement, a physical connection to view the context with clarity. As so used in Alice Walker’s literary piece, In Search Of Our Mothers’ Gardens.
“The Metaphor,” by Budge Wilson, is a short story about a young girl, Charlotte, coming of age. It begins with Charlotte as a seventh grader stuck between the two poles of her life: her teacher and mother. During the course of this bildungsroman, there are many techniques the author uses to strengthen and amplify its theme of growing up. Through the use of motif, juxtaposition, and symbolism, the reader is aware of the protagonist’s growth. In the story, the most potent motif is the metaphor.
In an excerpt from The Great Influenza by John M. Barry, many rhetorical devices are used to fully represent the process of a scientist. Some of the most commonly used devices are metaphors, anaphoras, and imagery, these three devices help the reader understand the main ideas of the story. The metaphors allow the reader to perceive the process of a scientist in more simplistic ideas such as science being an undiscovered wilderness. The anaphora used in the beginning of the passage emphasises that the world of science is full of uncertainty and is constantly changing, this drives the idea into the mind of the reader. The imagery is used alongside the metaphors to assist the reader in grasping the foreign ideas.
Metaphors such as this one create connections and empathy between the audience and the speaker. Using a metaphor is the perfect way to evoke a reaction from the audience. The use of metaphors in Reynolds’ speech allows the audience to develop empathy toward the speaker and the speaker’s
Metaphors allow the audience to gain an emotional reaction and connection to the
The overall understanding of metaphors used in everyday language comes from learning with one another, just like Lipsitz’s idea of evolution in his book, “It’s All Wrong But It’s All Right”. Metaphors
I mainly use metaphors to help someone better understand a concept. For example, one could say that another is a walking dictionary. This helps us to infer something about another person. We assume that she knows a lot of words and definitions. Right now, I mainly see a lot of repetition and metaphors in music.
Similar to similes, metaphors also compare two unlikely things to each other, but without using “like” or “as” to do so. One specific example of a metaphor could be when Bradbury wrote, “She was an old photograph dusted from an album, whitened away, and if she spoke at all her voice would be a ghost”(Bradbury 11). By comparing Margot to an old photograph and a ghost, readers can see just how much the rain has affected her in ways such as making her very shy and quiet and how the rain has brought out all color within her making her look old and gloomy. Metaphors, just like the other crafts, play a special role in making the stories more interesting and exciting.
The sciences and the creative humanities have reached a novel level of conflict in the recent years with one striving toward the literal, rational, and purged of literary creativity and the other, literature, wholly embracing its history as an artistic commentary on the human experience. Does all scientific writing take this approach? Is there benefit in poetics in science? These are difficult questions to answer, and may depend substantially on context and desired audience.