At the conclusion of this vivid literary work by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Dr. Grimesby Roylott dies after being bitten by a Swamp Adder, the most venomous snake in India. I believe that Sherlock Holmes was not accountable for the passing of Dr. Roylott and was entirely innocent. When Sherlock initially saw the deadly creature he knew he had to act swiftly and defend himself and Dr. Watson. Furthermore, Dr. Roylott knew the treacherous snake would return eventually; yet, he still sat in the chair which left him vulnerable. The most vital fact is that, how was Sherlock to know that Dr. Roylott was in a susceptible position in the next room?
A man named James Mortimer wants Holmes to investigate a crime which took place in Devonshire in which a man called Sir Charles Baskerville was killed by a "Hound". It is an old legend that a mysterious hound will chase the Baskerville family. Mortimer does not believe it and wants Holmes to investigate the crime as well as save the nephew of Charles Baskerville, Henry Baskerville who inherited the Baskerville manor from Charles Baskerville. Holmes accepts and helps to find the culprit. Holmes sends Watson to Devonshire and tells him to investigate and do the groundwork of their investigation until Holmes arrives too.
In the book This Savage Song by Victoria Schwab, Kate, one of the main characters, kills a man when he ambushes her. The man was working for a group of monsters, Malchai, who were trying to take over Verity, the city Kate’s father runs. The man himself is evil and has caused many deaths, so Kate killing him was actually a good move. At first, it sounded as if she did it because she was moving too fast, but she recognized the man to be in cahoots with the Malchai. She took a calculated risk when she killed man, but it was not a accident.
Since Debra is a detective, she should suspects The Ice Truck Killer, Rudy, of these terrible crimes, but because of his charming nature; she is oblivious to his true identity. In addition to The Ice Truck Killer, the Trinity Killer throughout season four performs a perfect act of what it is to be a father, community server, and teacher; yet, in his free time murders innocent people. In comparison with monsters, serial killers are not necessarily
The Hound of the Baskervilles -> Facts about the character: The person I am going to describe is Mr. Jack Stapleton. Mr. Jack Stapleton is the bad guy in the Hound of the Baskerville. In the Hound of the Baskerville a lot of unexpected things happen. But everyone knows that Mr. Jack Stapleton is the Murder in the book. The real name of Jack Stapleton is Rodger Baskerville Jr. An other name he used was Vandeleur.
This is exactly the recipe for a cliché ending: The protagonist finds out who the killer is, then the protagonist rushes to the place where the antagonist holds someone dear to them, and finally, the protagonist saves the day. I Hunt Killers follows this recipe ☺ exactly. The book is also predictable because the person that the reader thinks is the most innocent turns out to be the killer: “………………………..” In this case, a man posing as a victim’s grieving father is the murderer behind it
In Cold Blood by Truman Capote was a crime novel that shock many people in the world because of how a small town family is kill out of nowhere by deformed murders and also how a community would be affected by this conflict. Also, Capote is successful of bringing the murders Dick and Perry back to live. Capote makes them too sympathetic because of how he expresses their mental health, their harsh backstories and the trial that take place in part 4. These three reasons make Capote successful of bringing the murders back to life. Capote is successful of describing the mental illnesses of the murders before they were evaluated by Dr, Jones.
The characters in Hamlet were misled in the same way because they had poison poured into their ears. This is explained by the Ghost when Hamlet learns of his father being murdered in Act 1 Scene 5, in lines 35 -39, “’Tis given out that, sleeping in my orchard, A serpent stung me. So the whole ear of Denmark Is by a forged process of my death Rankly abused. But know, thou noble youth, The serpent that did sting thy father’s life . Now wears his crown.” 2) The soliloquies that Hamlet provides over the sequence of the entire play allows us to distinguish what Hamlet was thinking about and display how he was losing his sanity.
The motto is translated as “no one attacks me with impunity” (527). The coat of arms represents Montresor, the snake, getting revenge on the Fortunato, who has metaphorically stepped on him. Fortunato’s pride in his knowledge of the Montresor family makes this even more ironic, because the reader has been directly informed of Montresor’s plans. Poe’s use of the first-person point of view in “The Cask of Amontillado” allows the reader to experience a story of murder and revenge from an atypical perspective. By using the narrator’s point of view and establishing a connection with the reader, one can see the situation as it unfolds through the mind of this callous and calculating murderer.
The atmosphere of mystery is presented throughout the novel, because all the character could be the murderer or an accomplice. At the end of the story, the narrator is in the town and tries to resolve the mystery of the Santiago Nasar’s murder, but the narrator does not get something more than Santiago Nasar is death. It could seem an imaginary novel, in fact, it is. Chronicle of a death foretold is one of the most relevant work of magical realism. All works included in this literary movement mix real events with fantastic elements.