Kelli Kuchefski Professor Buttrick Business Ethics 4/23/18 NCAA Bribery Scandal I. Introduction Today’s society is full of ethical dilemmas that question whether people are acting morally or immorally correct. How is it that we, as a society, are not able to determine whether our actions are right or wrong? Is it that we, as humans, feel we are exempt from following the rules? One area of focus that is getting a lot of press lately, where morals and ethics are in question, is the world of college sports and athletics. II. Factual Background In the past couple of months, certain college basketball assistant coaches have experienced quite a bit of scrutiny and backlash after an FBI investigation against basketball assistants went public. The …show more content…
Person would not agree with his actions if he wasn’t one of the people receiving these cash payments because he would be compelled to look at the immoral aspects of his actions and the trust he shattered with his players. These NBA-bound players have the brightest futures ahead of them and are looking to their superiors for guidance. If Person were to turn the circumstances on himself and remember the time he entered the NBA, he would be enraged if his success and talent was taken for granted in order for his coach to make a little extra cash. He should’ve reflected on this situation when choosing to accept the payments and participate in these immoral acts. Person’s lack of a moral compass and his inability to differentiate between right and wrong has been the main cause of his decline as a leader and a …show more content…
Kant believes that we need to respect all humans no matter where they live, or how well we know them. The second formulation is a parallel to the Golden Rule, that we should treat others how we want to be treated and treat them respectfully. If this theory were to be applied to Person’s situation, it is apparent that he has acted immorally. By receiving cash bribes in return for steering his players towards certain agents/advisors, he was using these players’ talents as a mean to put money in his own pocket. Person disregarded all rules and principles in order to obtain a personal benefit. Essentially, Person felt he was above the law and he was allowed to act against everything he subconsciously knew was
The University of Michigan Basketball Scandal was a series of NCAA rule violations between the men’s basketball team at the University of Michigan and a team booster Ed Martin. Team booster, Ed Martin illegally provided players with cars and hundreds of thousands of dollars. The scandal involved many basketball players from the University of Michigan, including future NBA players at the time, Chris Webber, Maurice Taylor, Robert Traylor and Louis Bullock. The scandal reflected very poorly on Michigan and they had to face their punishment which had years of effects. The whole investigation started on February 17, 1996, when Maurice Taylor was driving a Ford Explorer and rolled it in Detroit MI.
The Penn State scandal involved more than just the individual committing the crimes. Many of the university’s officials were at fault for not reporting the alleged crimes to the Board of Trustees or Pennsylvania police. This type of behavior shows how the culture was a clan style and more of a family characteristics of protecting their own (Brumfield, 2012). Jerry Sandusky, a former assistant football coach, was with the university for almost forty years and was admired as an upstanding citizen. He was the organizer of a charity call The Second Mile, which assisted disadvantage youth.
PROS: The pros of the Louisville scandal were very hard to identify. Being that the scandal was very much the hot topic and caused more bad than good, there are not many pros of this scandal. One pro that I found while reading up on the Louisville Scandal was that it brought the team, school and also the coaches many opportunities of fame and attention. During this time of attention, there was a book published called ‘breaking cardinal rules: Basketball and the Escort Queen.’
Jerry Sandusky was an assistant football coach at Penn State University from 1969 until his retirement in 1999. He was well respected and even founded a charity organization for disadvantaged youth. After his retirement, he was still frequently on campus due to his status as an esteemed coach and professor emeritus. During his 30 year tenure at Penn State and thereafter in his retirement, Sandusky was involved in several incidents of lascivious behavior with minors.
Jerry Sandusky sexually abused children, specifically young boys, on the Penn State University campus. Four move-makers, Graham Spanier, Gary Schultz, Timothy Curley, and Joseph Paterno, with authority were aware that Jerry Sandusky had a problem with having sexual and/or sexual intent encounters with children. Their first public knowledge of this was when a mother reported to the police that he had showered with her son on campus. Following this incident Mike McQueary reported an eye-witnessed encounter of Sandusky and a child to one of the four, Joseph Paterno, in which it took him over 24 hours to make a move with the information. (Crandall, Parnell, Spillan, 2013).
Jerry Sandusky, assistant football coach for Penn State by all outward appearances seemed to be an outstanding citizen who worked with the legendary Joe Paterno and founded The Second Mile, which was a charitable organization that helped disadvantaged youth. Unfortunately, for the children, Jerry Sandusky was also a serial child rapist. Another tragedy is that although you would think if anyone knew of the abuse, they would have helped these children, in this case, people in high places knew of the abuse and did nothing. Some of the most powerful people, which included President Graham B. Spanier, Senior Vice President-Finance and Business Gary C. Schultz, Athletic Director Timothy M. Curley and the Head Football Coach Joseph V. Paterno, at
When the topic of segregation is brought up many instantly think of the 1960s and the Civil Rights Movement. Many also think of the ‘separate by equal’ ideology that existed for years after the Supreme Court case of Plessy vs. Ferguson. Such an ideology created laws and norms to have separate facilities for people of color from whites. However, these ideologies did not just pertain to public facilities, but also within them, such as sports. In the book, Benching Jim Crow by Charles Martin, the author gives an in-depth analysis of the segregation and color lines that existed in college sports from the 1890s through the 1980s.
In this article, they analyze the promotions and firings of NCAA Division 1 college coaches for both basketball and football. The objective is to research and to assess whether these coaches are compensated for the academic performance of their players thru promotion and or retention decisions. In this article, we discover that according to statistics, the better the player performs academically, the likelihood that the coach is fired is slim to none. However, there was no evidence that the positive academic performance led to a promotion for the coach either. This gives valuable information to consider while writing regarding how successful I will be as a coach even if my players are academic scholars or
The Athletes that use performance enhancing drugs PEDs in sports has sparked serious ethical debate. A recent investigation revealed that 6 players on the North Carolina panthers 2004 Super Bowl team were filling prescriptions for steroids. Barry Bonds, the San Francisco Giants’ slugger and Golden Glove Award winner, will likely break Hank Aaron’s career home run record before the end of the 2007 Major League Baseball season.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
The NCAA rarely has lost in the courts. It has been getting away with illegal practices for years by holding hostage to amateurism principles it was founded on. Thirty years after the NCAA v. Board of Regents court decision, the NCAA’s hand was forced when Ed O’Bannon and Same Keller took their concern to higher court. The plaintiffs filed and consolidated their complaint in 2009 claiming antitrust violations and misappropriations of student athlete’s likenesses.
Jerry Sanduski, an assistant football coach for the Penn State, engaging in sexual abuse of children over a period of at least fifteen years. The scandal broke tate Nittany Lions in early November 2011 when Sandusky was indicted on fifty-two counts of child molestation. Although Sandusky's abuse may have begun in the 1970s, he was charged with abuse that occurred between 1994 and 2009. , obstruction of justice, failure to report suspected child abuse, and related charges. The Board of Trustees commissioned an independent investigation by former FBI director Louis Freeh and his law firm.
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.
Amateurism in college athletics is an exploitation of the athletes who participate in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports. The amount of work that is done by these athletes to help their respective institutions generate millions of dollars in revenue, goes seemingly unnoticed when identifying the substantial amount of money flow in NCAA sports and the amount of people, from stakeholders to alumni, that benefit from this source. Amateurism, the foundation of NCAA sports, has been in place for over a century of time dating back to the early 1900s. Any athlete who is making money for work they’ve done outside of their institution is not being exploited, however, an athlete can easily be placed on the other end of the spectrum when he or she is withheld from recognizing the true monetary value of their talents and likeness that are being used for the profit of the school or others. The NCAA is understandably satisfied with the continuous growth of its’ revenue each year, yet the problem they face of having people accept that “student-athletes” are just amateurs is growing as well.
Athletic injuries have never been a big deal in our culture. They are often dismissed with the famous argument of choice. They chose to play the sport, they are to be held responsible if injured because of it. This is a statement that our society as a majority full-heartedly agrees with, but is something that Steve Almond questions in his article “Is It Immoral to Watch the Super Bowl?”. In his article Steve impartially argues about the moral ambiguity of watching the Super Bowl and how our adoration of the game has led us away from the thought that football is harmful.