Examples Of Net Neutrality

No one likes to be put on restriction of what they’re allowed to do. According to Merriam-Webster, net neutrality is what gives us the freedom to do what we need to do on the internet (Merriam-Webster.com). All people should be able to experience net neutrality, it is what allows us to create and experience the internet’s infinite potential and limits. Net neutrality gives us all equal opportunities, creates innovation and keeps cable companies out of having to much power. These are the reasons why you should support net neutrality.

Defenders of net neutrality argue that when there would be no network neutrality several problems would arise, with the main issue discrimination of content and the breach of freedom of speech. First ISP’s could prefer the content and applications of one business over another business. It may block the content altogether or make consumers pay to access the content. Furthermore it may slow some websites down who burden the channel capacity, websites like Netflix could be slowed down and therefor will not be able to provide proper service to its customers.

A good example of ISPs blocking or favoring content is, “Comcast can slow down the Internet speed of services like Netflix in favor of giving faster streaming speeds for NBC shows like ‘This is Us’ on Hulu. In other words, ISPs can pick and choose what services to put on the ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ Internet lanes. This will affect the way people navigate the Internet” (Source 1 ,1). Net neutrality

Or rather “...to give users the right to use non-harmful network attachments or applications, and give innovators the corresponding freedom to supply them.” Without net neutrality, the Internet could become a more difficult place for startup companies. Should the government alone regulate the Internet with laws, even those intended to protect it. And how would they regulate these laws? Net Neutrality is an important political issue that affects Americans, and these laws should be voted on to determine the state of the Internet.

This control will allow them to discriminate between the contrasting applications and content. This opens the opportunity to extract new traces of revenues by accusing content providers for important rights. Keith Collins article in "Why Net Neutrality Was Repealed and How It Affects You" in the NY Times explains the impact of net neutrality if the rules are repealed. The biggest problem that can occur is that the internet will become pay-to-play technology with two categories; one that has a fast service and the other slow.

I am in favor of network neutrality, because it has more pros than cons. With network neutrality I feel more using safe, I feel a sense of equality. Knowing that I am not being discriminated or charge differentially based on my usage. Knowing that everyone with AT&T is receiving the same internet speeds as I. And the internet as always worked as a network neutrality, and it was fine before so what is point of trying to change. As long as the internet remains open then I see no problem.

Similar to Frisby, this is a regulation of a virtual traditional public forum for a substantial government interest that is sufficiently narrowly tailored to meet that end. Just like the valid ordinance that limited where protestors can picket, Section 202.5 limits where the individual can go, and does not target based on what the message conveyed is. Essentially the statute is content neutral because it regulates one’s ability to access the website in the first place not what is being expressed. Section 202.5 is a specifically a content neutral time, place, manner regulation of protected speech because it bans registered sex offenders from accessing Facebook, which inadvertently limits their expression of speech on the social networking

Net neutrality is the basic principle that everything on the World Wide Web, which is coming known as the Internet, must not be discriminated against by Internet service providers, the government, or any other ruling interest. Net neutrality is the fight to preserve that notion before Internet service providers decide not everything is meant for you to see. In basic terms the majority shareholders of Internet service providers, being Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Cox Communications are censoring and slowing down the Internet unless the websites pay them a hefty fee. If this article by Nilay Patel was written to persuade the greater audiences of these atrocities, the youth, for example, it would be written totally differently, we are here to

As one court stated “the concept of internet privacy is a fallacy upon which no one should rely” (Sprague, 2011). These people claim that companies need to monitor their employees’ social media accounts so that their employees refrain from illegal, inappropriate, or even illicit activities. Furthermore, they are under the impression that nowadays, the boundaries between private and professional lives have been blurred due to technology. It may be true that lines are crossed and boundaries are overstepped sometimes in some cases; nevertheless, that does not apply to all cases and believing that it does would be believing a hasty generalization. If a company wishes to limit their employees from discussing anything work related on social media, then the company should enforce rules that prohibit their employees from doing so.

Net neutrality has remained a core democratizing tenet of the internet since the time it came into existence. In my present article, I will discuss several issues raised on the principle of net neutrality. Therefore, here’s all you need to know about net neutrality and the controversies surrounding the issue. What is net neutrality?

Net Neutrality has been a major problem. Yet many people are not aware of what it is and how it can benefit people who use the internet. Net Neutrality is the principle that the internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the internet equally, not discriminating or charging differently by who user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or modes of communication. With net neutrality the government cannot control or regulate the internet. The president strongly supports net neutrality and making laws for the internet to be open.

In other words, we can have free communication. For normal web users, the entire source of the internet is freely available. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access. There are people who think net neutrality is ethical; there are several reasons for it.

Net neutrality benefits new developers opportunity to share their idea to the world without financially destroying them. If the net neutrality is abolish broadband providers benefits while bring harm to content providers and change how the internet works. Changing the internet provide difficult issues to many place but if no one touch the internet all is good.

In the article “How to Protect Your Reputation in The Digital Age,” Greg Beato, the editor for Reason magazine, claim that within the digital age of the internet no one is truly secured or private. Beato argued with the internet many had adopted negative personas to ridicule other as they believe that their action has no impact and consequences. Beato argued that eventually these people will go so far as playing judge and jury with others social life’s and harm reputation’s in the process, but he asserts that it’s easier than ever for others to find you on the internet than ever. Beato believes that what you do on the internet resonate more about you than you think, and they speak and represent you. As he reminds us that people represent themselves

This can lead to issues with invasion of privacy, with some Web sites using cookies to collect even more information - although they are required to give a notification on every page about that now - that can be sold to advertisers. These cookies are usually as harmless as a file saying you visited the Web site, but they can’t execute code, meaning they can’t deliver a virus. Ad companies can also send cookies through their ads, so that they can collect information across multiple Web sites, to find out which ads receive the most clicks, which ads do better on which sites, and so on. Cookies are also unable to access your computer or any information you haven’t deliberately given, such as your name on social media, or which pages you visit on a Web site, but that information is only visible to whoever sends the cookie. Generally, cookies are not a threat, unless you consider viewing the Web sites you visit a