NAWAZ SHARIF H – MAD14100 POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY ESSAY A democratic state can be defined as a political entity which governs the workings of its citizens with the aid of power bestowed upon it by the same source through various modes. The government can however choose to put the welfare motive on the backseat and instead implement policies rigged by the interest of a handful of people who are economically or politically useful to satisfy their interests. The question remains how should a citizen act in reaction to this. Let’s look at a situation where their interests are negatively effected. Under such situation the person can choose to raise his voice in order to protest in the form of activism or mass movements knowing that the outcome may be uncertain yet having faith in the possibility of desired results. He is ready to undergo the various sacrifices needed and negatives that might steam from the target culprits. The person is well aware of the power of the common man in initiating change. A contrary result can be if the person accepts the outcome either as that conjured by his fate or as mode to be loyal towards the political parties they feel have superior and ultimate power over them which they may think is irreversible. Some may express sincere loyalty and subservience towards the state considering the state’s …show more content…
It can be concluded that exit is not a feasible option in response to a government policy as there might be possibility that an individual faces the same problem wherever he goes. India is a democratic country and people have right to choose the government. If something is not going correct in the body which itself is made by the citizens of this country, rather than leaving, people should choose to stay and fight back. This is because every decision made by this government indirectly points towards the decision made by the people at the time of
History and Evolution of Political Parties in Texas The historical backdrop of political parties in Texas is the story of changing political regimes. It depicts a century-long stretch after a decade of post-civil war reconstruction run by Republicans came to be ousted by the Democratic Party (Black 1013). Similarly, how that "political framework" steadily began to crumble during the post-civil rights period, to be replaced by a dynamic system ruled by the Republicans. The history explicitly explains the evolution of the parties.
Why has American political history been dominated by the two-party system? When and how have third (or fourth) parties challenged this status quo? The elections of 1796 changed the course of American politics forever. The 1796 elections were the first elections where the presidential candidates represented opposing organized political parties for a place in office. Political parties are alliances, “of like-minded people who work together to win elections and control of the government [...] for the ability to put their philosophies and policies into effect” (“Political Parties”).
The trend in congressional polarization overshadows the trends in public. While congressional moderates dissipate, moderates in the public “in the United States stands at its highest point in more than 75 years” according to polling (Smith). Many moderates ‘lean’ toward the left or right which causes the first problem in many polarization studies. Polarization means that constituents disperse from the center of the line to either or right into political parties, not necessarily radical, but many of these ‘leaners’ continue to vote on an issue to issue basis (Enns and Schuldt). Congressional polarization differs immensely; this trend appears more as sorting where partisans move to more “extreme ideologies” (Hill and Tausanovitch 1060).
7/9/2023 The Evolution of the Political Party and Political Polarization [1] After the events of the American Revolution, in his Farewell Address, President George Washington warned against the nature of political parties; however, as political affairs became increasingly complex, the government required a different system. Today, and throughout much of American history, this system takes the form of political parties. Furthermore, despite the existence of other parties like the Green Party, Reform Party, and Socialist Party, the only two political parties genuinely elected within the United States are the Democrat Party and Republican Party. Even with just two parties within the election system, dynamic change, and rich history
What are congressional elections? Congressional eletions are elections held to choose the next represenative. The Congressional elections are held every two years. The people who are campaigning with eahother spend, a extensive amount of money on their campaigning. Some of the money used to help with the campaigning is donated by people or by the political action committees (pac).
When an individual supports their values and beliefs, they understand the results of standing behind them. This, however, is not the case for the citizens of the United States. Many Americans say that they are fully behind certain causes, but when they see their beliefs turn to reality, they are often surprised and shocked at the consequences because they initially never understood them. It is understood that we as citizens stand up for a country that honors truth, liberty, freedom and justice. But what if we are persuaded to think how they would like us to?
Briefly, in the evolution of the Texas political system, Texas’s history has been through many situations that shaped the political structure in Texas to become to what it is today. Many changes were responsible for the impact in the history of Texas such as the Texas revolution, the Alamo war with Mexico, military reconstruction act in 1867, etc. Before the war with Mexico, one of the most important impact in Texas history was the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836. Texas and Mexico have an escalating tension and is responsible for the new change in the Texas state constitution. For the cause of the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836, Texas begins by declaring its independence in 1836, established the Republic of Texas, and decided to adopt the new constitution.
US Elections By: Kismat In my opinion Donald Trump should not have been voted for president. His thoughts and views about the world are really unusual. He is a racist and he has some bizarre ideas which I doubt would make America a better place.
Scholars from all over the Western world have analyzed and discussed the impact of democracy has had for the citizens of the United States, for over 200 years. Each new period throughout American history, has brought a new concept of being an individual in a democratic society. One flaw scholars from the late nineteenth century saw with democracy was that the majority ruled and if an individual part of the minority their voices were not heard, even if the minority was just and the majority unjust. Thus the democracy most Americans are proud to have is primarily individualistic and can be deemed corrupt because of the focus of majority rule, which might not be the wisest decision. Alexis de Tocqueville was a French writer who wrote several essays on his visit to the United States.
As a former leader of the free world, President Obama evidences and clarifies the benefits and defining qualities of a democracy that encourages for the formation of more democratic forms of government. “Governments that respect the rights of their citizens and abide by the rule of law do better, grow faster, draw more investment than those who don’t” (President Obama). This respect not only establishes a peaceful relationship between the government and its people but also allows freedom to reign. This analysis of the effects of democracy on human rights is necessary, for it is quite evident that in authorities and monarchies these same freedoms are not granted.
Social movement is not the task of a few persons, called to a specific purpose, but it is the responsibility of the whole community. They must learn the commitment to shared goals, consensus decision making, open and honest communication, shared leadership, climate of cooperation, and collaboration. Partnership and collaboration with others need sacrifices from both sides to be able to share vision, open up for communication, confrontation, etc. …, and most importantly, to sacrifice oneself in order to reach the vision or the plan that they have set out to achieve. For instance, the Indian Independence March, the Selma March, and the Sharpeville Massacre showed “self-sacrifice” of the protest through many deaths to gain independence (Howard).
Democratic Perspectives What do you think about democracy? Authors Sara Holbrook and Reginald Rose of “Democracy” and 12 Angry Men, both share their own opinion on this topic. This essay will be comparing and contrasting their two opinions based on evidence from their texts. Rose and Holbrook both express their opinion on democracy and how it affects their lives in different ways.
“Democracy is beautiful in theory; in practice it is a fallacy,” said Benito Mussolini. By the time one enters the third grade they become aware of concept of democracy. Specifically in America, one is taught that they live in a democratic society. When asking what is democracy, the answer is never truly defiente. The answers given may be; a society where everyone votes, or by dictionary definition “a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of the state; typically through elected representation.”
Political parties serve countless roles in America’s government. Foremost, it needs to be said they are crucial to America’s political system. The political parties are the heart and brain of our government's body, urging people to conceive and feel different ways on different topics whether the controversy is over how money is distributed or the way immigrants should be treated or dealt with. With each party having a biased view it shows how a group can be increasingly powerful with bountiful amounts of support, names and divisions can be heard. Democrats are widely known to be liberal rather than conservative.
Conclusion: Page 6 6. Bibliography: Page 6 Introduction: This an age old argument on whether the people should be ruled by one single all powerful leader who isn’t challenged or a leader who is democratically elected into power. In this academic piece I will be looking at the benefits and pitfalls of each form of government as well as give a few examples of each and decide if they were successful.