ipl-logo

Examples Of Prima Facie

571 Words3 Pages

Prima Facie is a phrase that came from Latin, which means ‘at first glance’ or ‘on the face of it’. It can also define as initial impression. However, that are two different meanings of ‘prima facie’. In one use, for most civil problems, ‘prima facie’ means having enough presented evidence to withstand a motion for directed verdict. The plaintiff must provide enough evidence to support the claims and shift the burden of evidence to the respondent. The evidence must be strong enough to call up the respondent to answer, this evidence is called as sufficient evidence. If there is no prima facie case, the respondent will just walk away without rebutting any evidence that the plaintiff has presented. Assume that an employer fail to promote the plaintiff based on her sex. …show more content…

There is no burden for the employer to produce until the case has become a prima facie case. However, if the plaintiff cannot produce enough evidence to support his/her claims, then the judge will decide that there is no prima facie case and may dismiss the case. The other uses ‘prima facie’ is also can define as specific evidence which is used to support the case in the charge. ‘Prima Facie evidence’ can be used in both civil or criminal law. For example, a people Q, have been murdered, the prosecutor presented a voice record about the defendant threaten to murder Q if Q does not want to accept his contract, such evidence may be Prima Facie evidence of intend to kill. Prima Facie evidence does not mean that it cannot be deny, it is use to prevent charges being made have no evidence to back it up and waste the time for court and other parties. According Section 173(f), if the judge decide no prima facie case then the defendant will be acquitted because the evidence is not sufficient. Presumption that the defendant are innocent until proven to the

Show More
Related

  • Arnold V Yellowtone Mountain Club Summary

    1678 Words  | 7 Pages

    The moving party has the initial burden of proving no genuine issue of fact. Once this is met, the burden shifts to the opposing party to present material evidence that is not “mere conclusory or speculative,”

    Read More

  • Summary Of Sam Mara Conspiracy Case

    1037 Words  | 5 Pages

    A reasonable jury when faced with the evidence would find it difficult to render a verdict beyond a reasonable doubt favorable to the State. Clayton, 235 S.W.3d at 778

    Read More

  • Examples Of Vera's Statement Of Hearsay

    753 Words  | 4 Pages

    Question 1 - Vera’s Statement a. Was Vera’s statement a hearsay? Under the Federal Law, hearsay is not admissible in the courts. A hearsay is an out of court statement that is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Hearsay is generally inadmissible since the judge or jury is unable to form an opinion regarding whether the person making the out-of-court statement is reliable.

    Read More

  • Anthro 3211: Test Your Knowledge

    1333 Words  | 6 Pages

    Da-Nisha Mitchell Anthro 3211 Test Your Knowledge Chapter 3 1.Judge or Jury who listens to tell if statements are true. 2.Evidence is anything, objects, witness that are used to make a defendant guilty or Innocent. 3.Circumstantial, conclusive, conflicting and exculpatory 4.Evidence used to make the defendant look Innocent 5.Looking at what is left behind; events, evidence. 6.A direct transfer is when it goes to the source like a drug dealer selling drugs to someone.

    Read More

  • Appeal Of The Queen V. Danny Lalumiere Case

    1100 Words  | 5 Pages

    There is a wide range of ways to interpret a case before arriving at the final verdict. In most situations, the best way is to prove the guilt of an accused. The facts presented before the court are vital to prove that a criminal act occurred. A determination should be made in a case to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. At times it is the full discretion of the judge to make a decision, which can deviate from the facts of the case.

    Read More

  • Knox Pros And Cons

    1622 Words  | 7 Pages

    Even though the circumstantial evidence implicated Brad, the forensic evidence presented was sufficient to implicate Knox. The testimony made by Mrs. Knox was admissible as the spousal privilege was broken. However, the defense representing Knox could argue based on the Fourth Circuit to dismiss the testimony against him. The Fourth Circuit holds that Mrs. Knox’s statement should be inadmissible and as such, violates the confrontation clause. The use of this testimony to implicate Knox violates the aspect of spousal privileges.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Bryan Stevenson's Just Mercy: A Story Of Justice And Murder

    919 Words  | 4 Pages

    I would understand if it was a case similar to O.J. Simpson, who had all the odds pointing to guilty but found innocent for the heinous murder that he committed; but, this is about a man who was falsely accused from the beginning. When Walter McMillian went to court to be trialed for the first time, there was “reliable evidence” that miraculously proved him guilty without any type of forensics to back it up. I thought that to be found guilty there needs to cold hard evidence to show the judge for a fair trial? And to not side with someone’s opinion because they heard a lie from their

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Payne V. Tennessee

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    The compliance of the evidence that relates to the damage caused by the victim’s death. The court ruled that since there was no restrictions on the use mitigating factors by the defendant, there should be no restrictions placed on the prosecution. The use of evidence regarding the abuse caused by a defendant is element of the case that determines the reasonable punishment. The use of the victim’s impact statement is another way to inform the authority about the abuse caused by the

    Read More

  • Fre 403 Vs Fre-404 Essay

    1185 Words  | 5 Pages

    FRE 403 and FRE 404(b) interact in a variety of degrees usually battling the other, in a courtroom regarding admissible evidence and on what grounds the argument may be made for or against using FRE 403 and FRE 404(b). These rules are vital inside a courtroom and the interaction between these different rules, is crucial to those presenting their case. According to our textbook, Evidence for Paralegals, in chapter 2 page 22, we learn a little history behind these rules as it pertained to evidence and the courts. Long before the Federal Rules of Evidence existed, the courts would come to conclusions about evidence by their relevancy legally. This meant that any evidence introduced would be decided that although it may be of sound logic to enter

    Read More

  • What Are The Facts Of Lavallee Court Case

    1404 Words  | 6 Pages

    Facts Angelique Lavallee killed her common law partner, Kevin Rust, by shooting him in the back of the head late one night after a party at their home. Lavallee was frequently a victim of physical abuse in the relationship, defining her as a battered woman. She made several trips to the hospital for injuries, such as bruises, fractured nose, black eye and multiple contusions, excused by unbelievable reasons. Witnesses testified to seeing and hearing the abuse committed by Rust onto Lavallee prior times to the party as well as at the party that evening. The shooting occurred subsequent to an argument that Lavallee and the deceased had been having in the upper level of the home, after Rust had reportedly told Lavallee to kill him or he would

    Read More

  • Wayne Williams Fiber Evidence Essay

    629 Words  | 3 Pages

    The fiber evidence presented in this case was so overwhelming and simply was the driving force leading to Wayne Williams conviction. I do not believe the prosecution would have been able to obtain the same results without it. The credibility of the FBI forensics investigators and their reputable crime lab made for excellent testimony concerning the fiber evidence at trail, which the defense was simply ill prepared to counter attack its merits (The Atlanta, n.d.). Other evidence was presented in this case, and much of this evidence while certainly impactful on the case and to members of the jury, this evidence alone without the fiber evidence would surely not have held up to the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Read More

  • Why Do People Convicted When They Only Have Circumstantial Evidence

    606 Words  | 3 Pages

    Why are people always convicted on something they only have circumstantial evidence on? I believe that there is many more ways for a jury to find out if a person is guilty or not and circumstantial evidence is one of the main things they use. Most of the time people get blamed for something they didn’t do and they don’t even have all the evidence to prove that one is guilty. So then they end up going to jail for a crime they did not commit. I don’t believe a person should be convicted of a crime based only on circumstantial evidence because I don’t think it’s fair for the victim.

    Read More

  • Evidence Based Prosecution In Domestic Violence Cases

    228 Words  | 1 Pages

    Evidence based prosecution is when offenders can be held accountable for their actions even without a victim's testimony or cooperation. The evidence of the prosecution is based on medical records, medical examinations, photographs, the 911 tape and things that are found on the victim's and offender's body. Evidence based prosecution is extremely important in domestic violence cases because it serves justice without having them testify against the offender face to face. The victim in this type of setting my be too afraid of the offender to speak up in fear of any further attacks, taking legal custody of their children, economic control, etc. Many victims of domestic violence do not make a report or if they do at the time they chose

    Read More

  • Comparing The Salem Witch Trials And The American Criminal Justice System

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    Today, modern standards require the burden of proof be brought forth by the plaintiff, or prosecution in criminal cases. This means that the accused no longer has to prove they did not commit the crime, but the prosecution has to prove that all the evidence proves the accused did in fact commit the crime in question. Circumstantial evidence is not enough, but physical evidence, or forensic evidence is now required in modern courts for a conviction. Additionally, the modern standard when considering evidence, and for conviction is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

    Read More

  • Roxane Gay's Essay 'A Tale Of Three Coming Out Stories'

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    Evidence can be anything that proves or backs up what your argument is about. It helps the reader better understand your argument. In Gay’s essay, she talks about three famous people who come out and announce that they are gay. She proves that famous people cannot have privacy, everything about them will come out to the public even though they want to keep it to themselves.

    Read More

More about Examples Of Prima Facie

Open Document