Most of the people around the world are born poor. It is a reality that many people are born and die in very precarious conditions. We always hear those stories of people who are born poor and work hard to end up being rich. However this stories are very few compared to the amount of poverty in the world. Furthermore, it is much more difficult to progress in a poor country than in a rich country because even if you are poor in a country like Denmark, you get access to education and are provided tools that help you to progress. You are even paid to finish high school. In this research paper i am going to investigate how difficult it is in various conditions to analyze a possible course of action that would lead to social mobility being possible. …show more content…
In most western countries, social classes are divided in low, middle and high, according to the wealth you have, while in countries such as India, they have a caste system which isn’t based on wealth but on other criteria.
Global perspective:
To analyze social mobility worldwide I chose 3 countries as a sample of this reality globally. To begin with, i analyzed how difficult it is to ascend socially in USA, a place where they defend icons such as Steve Jobs which become billionaire and started off being a middle class young entrepreneur. According to Equality of Opportunity Project, social mobility in USA is at similar rates as they were 30 years ago. According to the research made by this institution, people from the 20% people with lowest incomes have about a 10% of chances of reaching to the 20% of the people with highest incomes. Nowadays, in India the
…show more content…
It showed it has a social mobility similar to USA in 2005. However 10 years later social mobility decreased. Nowadays there is social mobility in Argentina. However, it is not as it was traditionally portrayed. Social mobility can be upwards or downwards. In my country there is a general tendency of a downwards mobility as a consequence of many consecutive governments which mismanaged funds, practiced demagogy and as such deteriorated two of the things that posibilitate upwards social mobility which are, education, and a strong currency that makes long term loans something possible. To analyze this issue further in depth I researched about what makes social mobility possible and the state in which they are in my country. To begin with, the economy is very delicate and not very good according to the FMI. Since 2011 growth was severely stopped and investments and companies are either fleeing the country or waiting until what happens after presidential elections. Secondly, luckily, the social system is open and anyone can reach any place in society if they want and can. Thirdly, education is not the best lately. Just the 43% of young people finish secondary school, and less than a 10% have third degree study. Furthermore, although there is free universal and secular education, its quality has drastically descended. This can be seen in the PISA examination done in 2013, where my country got the
Another example of upward economic mobility is that of the Hmong community, in Chia Youyee Vang’s work, Hmong America, Hmong engaged in a process of reinvention and forms of cultural adaptation and ethnic-political agency. By staying engaged with the governments around them they’re able to seek political recognition or resources from state and federal government departments to get jobs and goods and create distinct changes for their communities. On the one hand, they created peace amongst the clans that were rivals in Laos so there was mutual support amongst the different groups, which created an abundance of dialects, sub clans, voluntary, political organizations, ethnic churches. In time it created a schism in religion as some Hmong became
Social class correlates with inequality in the United States and Brazil, but what precisely leads to inequality is the dynamics of power people experience based on what social class they belong in. Sociologist John Gaventa discusses the three dimensions of power and how the maintain acquiescence among inequalities. These power dynamics, which correlate to people's social class, are what lead to inequality in the U.S. and Brazil. The First Dimension of Power correlates to social class in that those who are in lower social classes have fewer resources in achieving the American Dream. These resources include education, social and career connections, and money to save up.
We live a much different time where the cost of living has increased and the job availability has decreased. “According to the Pew Study on the American Dream, social mobility is increasingly difficult, if not impossible; the study found those born at both the top and the bottom of the “income ladder” stay where they are from one generation to the next.” (Rooks) Meaning that if you are born into poverty it is more likely than not that you will stay there. This could help to reason why politicians have a hard time coming up with a good plan of action to help those in poverty.
Throughout the economic social structure of the United States in the early 1970’s, unequal regimes and the idea of social mobility were used to maintain the structural harmony of the society.
In my opinion, I think upward social mobility is still a reality in the United States. I believe the idea that if one works hard enough, he or she has the ability to achieve what he or she desires. It is more difficult
Social stratification has been a part of society for thousands of years and has yet to dissipate. It is prevalent on the micro and macro level and has been a part of various societies and cultures ranging from the united states all the way to India. Social Stratification, "is a system of inequality that takes into account the differences among individual members of a society and ranks them by their wealth, power, prestige, and ascribed status, thus creating a social hierarchy" (Larkin, 2015, para. 5). The organizing principles of social stratification are class, gender, and race. The caste, slavery, and class system are all products of social stratification and have been seen throughout history.
Those failures and obstacles you encounter can only make you stronger. There is something else that plays a big role in the social mobility and the American Dream, which is structural mobility. Structural mobility is the movement up or down the social class ladder that is due more to the changes in the structure of the society
How does social class affect people’s lives? Social class groups individual persons into class hierarchy which is determined by person’s income, education, wealth, social connection, and job profession. Social class classifies people into spectrum of class such as lower class, lower middle class, middle class, upper middle class, and upper class. Depending on which class an individual falls in affects earnings, education, respect, success, status, family life, health, job occupation, and social connection. An individual that lies in higher part of class spectrum gets more opportunities and has better lives than an individual that lies in lower part of class spectrum that does not get opportunities and struggles in lives.
Within social mobility, many people fail to have a sense of the realization of the American Dream because of the fewer advantages and more problems minorities have to struggle through. Therefore, our social class affects our ability to realize the American Dream because we face challenges to make ends meet, intersectionality and education because of high status.
Building off previous scholarship of Bowles and Gintis, Bourdieu, Bernstein and Heath, Willis and Giroux, McLeod seeks to investigate the tension between personal agency and structural barriers to social mobility, or in his words, how “class based institutional mechanisms set limits on mobility, thereby ensuring social reproduction, while cultural innovations can be at once both functional and dysfunctional for
This class inequality is the reality that there are unequal opportunities and rewards granted to different social positions and statuses within a group or a society. Generally, there are four different levels of social class; the Capitalist Class, the Middle Class, the Working Class, and the Underclass. Social class inequality exists due to multiple key contributors including power, occupational prestige, schooling, ancestry, and race and ethnicity. Concerning one’s personal economic circumstance, income is the earnings from work or investments that they make annually, while wealth is their overall total value of money and other assets minus debts.
Therefore, in a stratified society, the individual’s opportunities are always determined by his or her social class. In this essay, I will be arguing that even though mobility exists in the social class system, the opportunity to change status is relatively open for everyone but the distribution of opportunities among the members of a social class is not relatively equal to all. I will demonstrate this point by showing how participation of an individual in a specific social class will decide the opportunities in terms of attaining education and achieving a well-paid job. Education has a significant role in promoting social mobility; it enables people to acquire knowledge and certain skills in order to promote their social status. Nowadays, people believe that societies are based on meritocratic
In order to support these claims, I will discuss the characterisitcs of social moblity, while providing the necessary examples. Social Mobility On the topic of social classes, the question of social progression ought to rise: is it possible for people to move within a society 's stratification organization? In other words, is there some possibility of social mobility, or the improvement from one social level to another?