Lisa Parsons Mr. Boyce English IV - Block E 12 January 2023 In Cold Blood Essay: Prompt #1 The term toxic masculinity took its place in the English vocabulary in the 1980s and fits the description of Perry Smith and Dick Hickock like a glove. Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood follows the story of these two men with shattered egos who make it everyone else’s problem. The Clutters, the victims of Dick and Perry’s ego depletion, were not meant to be destined to the fate that Dick and Perry assign to them. The adults in Perry’s childhood turning a blind eye to the abuse he faced, and Dick’s pedophilia, which is swept under the rug, atop many more aspects of these men indicate one thing. It can be said that Dick and Perry were simply products of their …show more content…
Both Dick and Perry had neglected signs in their childhood that they would lead this life of violence. Perry’s bed wetting after his father abandons him and “not long afterward [his] mother put[s him] to stay in a Catholic orphanage. The one where the Black Widows were always at [him]. Hitting [him]. Because of wetting the bed” (132). The bed-wetting is a trauma response and a concerning sign of the abandonment he faces which is only met with abuse because of the idea that men need to toughen up and compartmentalize. His time in the orphanages got so bad that he woke up in the middle of the night to a nun with “a flashlight,... hit[ting him]… And when the flashlight broke, she went on hitting [him] in the dark’”(92). Things like his snake and bird dream indicate the mental illness that is budding in his mind, that adults responsible for him left unaddressed because of societal expectations. His hate for the world began when his trauma was not dealt with and instead responded with more. Although Dick had a loving family who saw him as a child who could do no wrong, Capote deduces from “[o]ne [neighboring] farmer’s wife [who] said ‘Dick Hickock! Don’t talk to me about Dick Hickock! If ever I met the devil! Steal? Steal the weights off a dead man’s eyes!... Dick would’ve gone to jail more times than you can count, except nobody around here ever wanted to prosecute. Out of respect …show more content…
The inability to blame men stems from a sense of toxic masculinity and infatuation in our society with the idea that men can do no wrong; it is someone else who makes them act a certain way. The ability of men to use this toxic structure to their advantage, at the disadvantage of themselves and the women in their lives is a glaring detail in the novel that is often overlooked because society is conditioned to overlook it. The entirety of In Cold Blood embodies how men are not to blame for their actions but it is others’ fault for making them a certain way. The publication of such a novel is irresponsible of Capote as it perpetuates this dangerous narrative that has for far too long plagued our societal structure and the role of man and masculinity in
Being the smart criminal he is, Dick used his own name to sign the checks. They are caught and arrested by police in Las Vegas. A confession gives the reader a gory description of the vicious murder of the Clutter family. They were tried and convicted of murder after 40 minutes of jury discussion and were sent to Death Row. The story includes lots of flashbacks from Perry Smith’s sad and depressing childhood including alcoholism, sibling suicide, parental abuse and not being allowed to go to school.
(Capote 585). This quote shows the true backstory of Dick which plays into a part of why he is who he is. He was never like this before, as the story claims on the online page 582, “He just didn’t act like the same boy.” (Capote 582). The change in Hickock’s life was sparked by the car accident in 1950 and changed him as a person altogether.
Throughout the book "In Cold Blood," the characters of Dick and Perry undergo significant changes. At the beginning of the book, they are portrayed as cold-blooded killers who show little remorse for their actions. However, as the story progresses, we see a more complex side to their personalities. One of the most significant changes in the characters of Dick and Perry is their relationship with each other.
Perry and Dick get picked up by a man named Mr. Bell; who they have the intentions of killing, so they can steal his car. They end up not killing him because the man picks up another hitchhiker. While Capote talked with Perry, he told Capote, he regretted one thing about Mr. Bell: “Perry, as he later recalled, thought, Five kids–well, too bad” (Capote 173). Capote exposes Perry’s ruthlessness of a killer and how he does not care that the man has five children. Perry despises those who have what he has always wanted: family.
Capote portrays only one of these two seemingly distinct characters (Perry) in a way that the reader feels the need to relate to and even sympathize with him. One can be taken aback by such an attachment to a murderer. This is not surprising as the author uses his compassionate diction to manipulate the reader’s emotions with a use of pathos, the appeal to emotions. At one point Capote goes as far as to write that “Smith’s life had been no bed of roses,” (Capote 245) attempting to have the readers relate to Perry. On the other hand, Capote has Dick say this about himself: “Deal me out, baby, I’m a normal” (Capote 116).
In Truman Capote’s “In Cold Blood,” Dick and Perry have murdered the Clutter family and are on their way to Mexico. In this passage, Dick makes an astounding statement. In the passage, Dick claims that he’s “a normal” but that is far from the truth. He is a conniving, manipulative son of a bitch who thinks he’s normal in comparison to Perry.
Sexuality between Dick and Perry is explored as well as Perry and Dick’s individual sexualities. The Clutters are the first example of normality seen in ‘In Cold Blood’. They
Although Perry is responsible for the murder of four innocent people, Perry’s actions do not reflect on who he is as a person because he is easily influenced, therefore; showing how easily people can be pressured into doing something they would not typically do. Dick, a violent, cold-hearted, manipulator, has molded Perry into the person he is today. As Perry is a follower, Dick has taken advantage of that by turning Perry into the cold-blooded killer he is today. Capote displays Dick’s manipulation of Perry through symbolism to make evident that while Perry did pull the trigger on four innocent people, although the fault does not entirely lay on him, as he was taken advantage of by Dick.
While Dick’s attempt to profit from Perry originates from a lie that Perry creates in order to gain Dick’s respect, the language that Capote uses to illustrate Dick’s exploitation does not leave room for excuses or sympathy. The tone indicates Dick has malicious intention in befriending Perry, which gives the readers a cynical impression of him. Furthermore, Dick is seen to be disregarding of the gravity of his crimes, especially as he replies to Perry’s comment, “I think there must be something wrong with us" (Capote 114) to commit the murder like they did, in which Dick replies, “Deal me out, baby, I'm a normal,” and continues to entertain the thought, “ But Perry—there
Ang Lee’s 2005 film, Brokeback Mountain reinforces the idea that Gail Bederman introduces about masculinity in “Remaking Manhood Through Race And Civilization”, which says that masculinity encompasses “masculine ideals more familiar to the twentieth-century Americans- ideals like aggressiveness, physical force, and male sexuality.” (19). Through the films two main characters Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal) and Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger), we see that this idea of masculinity is clearly present during the 1970’s, the time in which this movie takes place. Both Twist, and Del Mar are cowboys, who display traditional masculine ideals, such as participation in farming, ranching, and activities in which you get your hands dirty. To the outside viewer, these two men seem to be the ideal type of masculine man that Bederman describes as the normal, ideal man.
Many readers of the novel In Cold Blood tend to believe that Perry’s conflict is with his partner, Dick, because he constantly talks down to and manipulates Perry. These readers however are wrong because Perry’s main conflict stems from the fact that he faced multiple complex traumas as a child which has led him to develop a mental illness. Perry continues to struggle with multiple effects of complex traumas such as dissociation, behavioral responses which are easily triggered, and difficulty or in ability to develop relationships with authority figures. These effects have stunted Perry’s ability to mature as an adult and have caused him to think impulsively and irrational throughout the novel.
He manipulated him in many ways, mainly during the execution of the crime, where he forced Perry to slaughter all four of the Clutters. Truman Capote makes it apparent that "It was Hickock who had forced Smith to take part in the murders, who had led him astray, who had destroyed him" (Capote 246). Perry was a victim of his influence, and was led down a destructive path that eventually led to both of their deaths. Moreover, Truman Capote contrasts their personalities; "Hickock, the mastermind of the crime, was the more vicious of the two...Smith, on the other hand, was a mixed-up kid who had been led down the wrong path by his older, more experienced partner" (Capote 93). Perry was very vulnerable and impressionable, so Dick took advantage of it.
Dick knew how to manipulate and get what he wanted. He was who Perry saw as a masculine man, someone to not be crossed, but who Perry looked up to. Perry noted that Dick was not a good role model, but still sought his approval causing him to lie about committing murder which got him roped into going with Dick to murder
From the beginning, Dick had a detailed plan of how they would carry out the murders, and he made sure that Perry was on board with his ideas. The scary part of all of this is that Dick considered himself normal, by saying, “I’m a normal” (Capote 108). In the book, it is clear that Dick was the one in control, and Perry is merely following his lead. For example, when they first discussed the robbery, Dick said, "If it's going to be done, it's got to be done right. No slip-ups...
“... Dick squanders his emotional capital and becomes unable to respond to the things that are worthy of deep emotion” (Tate 218). Dick also begins to realize the negative impact his temperament has on others. After he and Nicole have an argument, Dick says, “‘I guess I’m the Black Death,’ he said slowly. ‘I don’t seem to bring people happiness anymore’”