John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath is an American classic which utilizes many different kinds of philosophies. One such philosophy is proletarianism. Proletarianism is the description of the injustices of the laboring classes. Put simply, it is when one social class is pitted against another. There are many examples of this philosophy throughout Steinbeck’s novel. One such example is when Steinbeck’s character Tom Joad manipulates a truck driver into giving him a ride out to Joad’s family’s place even though the truck driver is forbidden to have passengers. When the truck driver points out the No Riders sticker on the windshield, Joad responds with “Sure--I seen it. But sometimes a guy’ll be a good guy even if some rich bastard makes him carry a sticker” (Steinbeck 7). the truck driver then allows Joad to ride with him. This is an example of proletarianism because it pits the truck driver against the “rich bastard”. With this example, Steinbeck could be making the statement that …show more content…
The tire salesman then states “It ain't that big. The whole United States ain't that big. It ain't that big. It ain't big enough there ain't room enough for you an' me, for your kind an' my kind, for rich and poor together all in one country, for thieves and honest men. For hunger and fat. Whyn't you go back where you come from?” (Steinbeck 120). This is an example of proletarianism due to it pitting the tire salesman against the migrants. In this example, Steinbeck could be stating that the fortunate look down on the less fortunate as if they are another race or species entirely. He could also be stating that money causes the wealthy to isolate themselves from the poor and that riches bring forth
In this despondent selection of “The Grapes of Wrath”, Steinbeck uses simple and morose euphemisms to cover the awful truths that the “owner men” must deliver to the unfortunate tenants. Steinbeck illustrates that the owner men do all that they can within logic to separate themselves from the fact that these innocent people’s lives are ruined simply because they need a bigger profit margin. “And all of them were caught in something larger than themselves … These last would take no responsibility for the banks or the companies because they were men and slaves, while the banks were machines and masters all at the same time” (Steinbeck 21). Steinbeck describes the owner men as being in a situation beyond their control, where in reality they absolutely could have refused to ruin innocent people’s lives,
Steinbeck also evokes feelings of compassion through his description of a young boy who “went into convulsions and died” due to a weak diet of “fruit, beans, and little else,” for the boy suffered a premature death, and there was little he could do to change his fate
The workers that were protesting outside the farm in The Grapes of Wrath are just like the protesters that protested in New York, they wanted fair and better wages so they could support themselves and their families. Although these two situations happened in different eras, they still hold the same issue that people need fair wages in order to survive. In the book, the low wages were bad because the Joad family couldn 't afford food while the low wages now won’t allow workers to pay rent. The time periods might be different but the issues are still the
The Dust Bowl consisted of a series of perfidious storms that occurred in the 1930's, the Dust Bowl affected everyone in the United States, mainly people in the Midwestern states. (The Dust Bowl even affected the world.) The Dust Bowl affected many things, such as the economy, farming, and of course the people of the United States. However, after the Dust Bowl came to an end, it taught us new methods of farming and give us new technology. But more importantly, it taught us ”what not to do.”
The Grapes of Wrath showed the early effects of such monopolies and both farmers and laborers socially and economically, and, in a way, it could be considered a warning against allowing such circumstances to develop. Whatever the intent of the book during time, important messages can be drawn from it concerning the agriculture of the United States, and the change from families working together to corporations ruling the
But they won’t do nothing like that. I won’t have no place to go, an’ I can’t get no more jobs.” This shows how although workers are mistreated, they often don’t have any other option and just have to live with it. The predatory world of Steinbeck is one in which the strong prey on the weak, and the vulnerable are left to fend for themselves. This is evident in the treatment if characters like Candy, Crooks, and Curely’s wife, who are all marginalized and oppressed in different ways due to their age, race, and
Two of the ways Steinbeck shows this idea is through the themes of Hell, and you have to be born rich or marry rich. Capitalism is like Hell. It is like Hell for people in lower social standings. For some people, they dream to escape their current
In The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck follows the Joad family as they suffer the hardships caused by the Dust Bowl in the 1930’s. The most important lesson people can learn from the novel is the value of a human life. Although the 1930’s was a low point in American society, the ill-treatment of human beings is still relevant today. Just like Jim Casy’s philosophy, it is important to fight for the rights of the people and their dignity. There are several examples of oppression in The Grapes of wrath.
The Grapes of Wrath, one of his most well-known works is exemplary of Steinbeck’s pursuit to bring attention to the lower class and their struggles during the Great Depression, and to hold those who caused the Depression accountable, as seen in his quote “I want to put a tag of shame on the greedy bastards who are responsible for this [the Great Depression and its effects]. I’ve done my damnedest to rip a reader’s nerves to rags” (“The Grapes of Wrath”]. Published in 1939, the novel follows a family of tenant farmers who are forced to turn their land over to the banks and journey across the Dust Bowl to the ‘promised land’ of California (“John Ernst Steinbeck”). The Grapes of Wrath became highly debated and criticized, and many accused Steinbeck of dramatizing the conditions portrayed in the novel to prove a point; however, he had actually underplayed the conditions, feeling that “exact descriptions would have gotten in the way of his story.” Though embraced by the working class, critics condemned the novel as a ‘pack of lies’ and ‘Communist propaganda,’ and the book was banned from 1939 to 1941.
The spirit of unity emerges as the one unfailing source of strength in Steinbeck’s novel. He tries and accomplishes in conveying it to the reader, through imagery. On multiple accounts,
In The Grapes of Wrath and Civil Disobedience, authors John Steinbeck and Henry David Thoreau discuss their beliefs about the government. Having being written more than one hundred years apart, these authors overlap and differ on some of their ideas about the government. Both Steinbeck and Thoreau believe that there should be a universal solution to governmental issues. However, they differ on what exactly should be universal and whether there should be a governmental force at all. It can be seen in both The Grapes of Wrath and Civil Disobedience that authors John Steinbeck and Henry David Thoreau believe that universal ideas are the solution to a well-run and just government.
John Steinbeck has a style of writing unparalleled in history and in the modern world. In the same way, his philosophies are also unparalleled, with his focus in socialism not extending to communism or abnegation of spiritualism. His ideal world is utopian, holding the dust bowl migrant at the same level as the yeoman farmer was held in Jeffersonian times. In The Grapes of Wrath Steinbeck Steinbeck, who posses impregnable technique, conveys his message of a group working tirelessly for the betterment of the community.
Propaganda is generally used as a derogatory term; the word itself signifies that the person distributing the propaganda has ulterior motive. The Grapes of Wrath was seen by many Americans as a work of propaganda against the American system. However, those people may not have been aware of the complete definition of propaganda: “information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.” While John Steinbeck was clearly publicizing the hardships of many migrants during the Dust Bowl, it is unfair to say the information he presented was biased or misleading in nature. Steinbeck did not publish a piece of propaganda, because he uses plot and intercalary chapters to show
Grapes of Wrath clearly illustrate the class struggle between workers and the upper class. Steinbeck displays the discrimination between the migrant people and landowners. Migrant workers are handled worse than animals, family’s or “Okies” are starving as food is wasted by the wealthy and the landowners maintain control through violence. “What do you want us to do? We can't take less share of the crop – we're half starved now.
Adding to the oppression of the farmers, the inhumane treatment of the laborers planted the seed of anger in their hearts, which sooner or later would grow and revolt against this obvious injustice that had already spread in the whole society. Shedding light upon Capitalism, Steinbeck clarifies to the reader the sickness of Capitalism, which divided the society, rather than preserving the structure of it in order to fight the obstacles and get rid of it all together, yet it divided the society. Furthermore, Steinbeck reveals the hatred that resulted from this awful system and he insults the upper class society and landowners who support this unjustified system. Indeed, the author himself was a social reformer who wanted to balance between the classes of society and get rid of the unfair systems that overpower the American society and always abuses the defeated