This reflection paper involves my insights by responding to questions on Excerpts from the Federalist No.1, written on October 27, 1787. which is one of many essays by Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton tried desperately to defend the constitution for the good of the people even though he had certain doubts and wanted to ratify it. The questions I will be answering are related to what he has written and what my opinions are. I will answer to the best of my knowledge and my thoughts. Alexander Hamilton asks the reader to consider if societies of people can establish good government through reflection and choice. What do you think? In Hamilton’s essay Federalist No. 1. He wrote, “whether societies of men are really capable or not, of establishing good government from reflection and choice.” On a YouTube video the narrator speaks on this statement from Hamilton, “reflection needs educated minds and ethics to make the right decision also people and politics have a choice for themselves”. (Political factions, 2015). What do I think about this question? I feel that …show more content…
He explains that the meaning of these words is important for security and liberty needing to stay in proper balance. Too many people wanted more freedom without the security”. (Political fraction, 2015). Hamilton was trying to let people know that it is a very important balance needed for the government and for the people to work and live efficiently by having security and liberty. How does a government maintain its vigor? A website I researched states what Hamilton wanted, “responsibility and vigilance, two virtues necessary to sustain at the time for a republican government”. (Mackubin, 2006). I do agree for the government to maintain its vigor they need to have a balance system of security and liberty. The people and the government must work
He believed that the country would run smoother with a strong and strict government. George Washington, the president at the time, could not decide on who he thought had the best idea. He needed a way to gain back the Americans trust and to make moeny, but both Hamilton and Jefferson were giving outstanding ideas to Washington on what he could do, Washington was just basially caught in the middle. After, Washington’s two years of
Thomas Jefferson was a Democratic-Republican. He strongly believed in a weak central government where the power was given to the states in order to preserve their rights and prevent a dictatorship. The best government in his opinion was the one that had the least input on people's decisions. Jefferson also had no intentions of expanding eastward. Rather, he believed that strengthening and expanding their borders at home should be the highest priority.
a) The government would also represent the people along with the point that states couldn’t infringe on individual’s right to land. b) Hamilton was in support of the idea that a president and Senate should serve life terms. c) Many people wanted to find a middle ground between
His campaign for a big, powerful government allowed for the government to support and protect the economy. His policy called for the federal government to assume the unpaid debts of the states. Hamilton states, “that assumption of the debts of the particular states by the union, will be a measure of sound policy and substantial justice” (Hamilton’s First Report on Public Credit). Hamilton’s policies also granted the right for the United States to have a National Bank that could print paper money, thereby stabilizing the value of currency. Hamilton stated that the bank’s chief object is “to enable the creation of a capital sufficiently large to be the basis of an extensive circulation, and an adequate security for it” (Hamilton’s Second Report on Public Credit).
He was able to combine an idea and politics. Hamilton is the reason the two are so closely tied together, and in doing this, he is known as the man who made modern America. He also envisioned America to have large debts, military force, and a modern economy with the large government. This is why Hamilton is probably the only who would understand America today. These are just some of the examples that Wood gives throughout the book that entail the difference in the Founders and todays
In 1787, a group of men gathered in Philadelphia to make revisions to the Articles of Confederation that governed their country. Instead, these men locked the doors, closed the windows, and planned out a completely new system of government. They knew that the strength the new Constitution gave to the government would be beneficial and change the country for the better; however, they also knew that they were imperfect. One of these men, Benjamin Franklin, once said that “For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise.” He was not alone in acknowledging his imperfections.
Hamilton believes in strong federal government and weak state governments. He also wants to favor rich people and insist on rich should rule the country and he has a loose interpretation of the constitution. Hamilton dreams towards country economy should
The Federalist Papers, essays written on behalf of the ratification of the Constitution, by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, are testaments to our Founding Fathers’ steadfast belief in a strong, national government; unified against the ills of those wishing to impose their tyrannical beliefs on the nascent country. More specifically, these eighty-five pieces of political brilliance truly shed light on just how divided our country was, with the Federalists believing in a national government, administered by a strong, core Federal system, and the Anti-Federalists, those who were opposed to the federal system, and alternately believed in a strong state system, with no strong, core federal government uniting the states. These Federalist papers were in essence a plea, then, to the people of the
One of the eighty-five essays was titled, Federalist 16. This essay was basically Hamilton stating his opinion on why America should stick with the constitution. He says that the government before
Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were both right “in light of subsequent history”, although, in my opinion one was more right than the other. Some cases of Alexander Hamilton being correct in his educated assumptions include “a… body can check the imprudence of democracy. Their turbulent and controlling dispositions requires check.”, and how I interpreted the quote was that Hamilton’s meaning was checks and balances in the national government is necessary to “pursue the public good”. Another case presented by Hamilton that I found was, “One great error is that we supposed mankind more honest than they are. Our prevailing passions are ambition and interest: and it will be the duty of a wise government to avail itself of those passions,
The first reason I agree with him is because of his ideas on human nature. I don’t think all people are totally evil like Hamilton, although sometimes they are. People can make good decisions, especially if they are informed, even when they don’t have a formal education. The second reason is about the government plans that Jefferson made. I do think that anybody
At the end of one his notes he states, “The mobs of great cities add just so much to the support of pure government, as sores do to the strength of the human body. It is the manners and spirit of a people which preserve a republic in its vigor” (721). This “pure government” to Jefferson is Americas
In articles “If, As Ralph Nader Says... We Love Our Congressmen So Much?” by Richard F. Fenno, Jr. and “The Case for Congress” by Lee H. Hamilton, readers are introduced to arguments related to Congress. Upon completion of the texts, one may conclude that Congress is an institution that is often disliked by the American public due to common misconceptions about how Congress functions. The first article, “The Case for Congress,” Hamilton attempted to educate the American public as to how Congress works for America as a whole. In the beginning, he states that Americans often take Congress for granted, however they should not do so because Congress is an example of “health of representative democracy amid...distrust of its central institution.”
In the early 19th century, the United States of America was still just a young nation trying to find its way. Two parties emerged as competitors for the people’s votes and the opportunity to enact their view of how the young government should be handled. On opposing sides were Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. The Federalist philosophy of Hamilton was less trusting of the common man and more valid for the time period given the state of the United States in the early 19th century than the Anti-Federalist views, divisive actions, and philosophy of a strict constitutional interpretation of Thomas Jefferson. Alexander Hamilton authored a great many of The Federalist Papers of the late 18th century.
He was a political statesman who often disparaged (regard or represent as being of little worth). His greatest contribution to American political thought may be his concept of constitutional government. Hamilton’s Federalist essays and other writings and speeches encompass (surround) a theory of politics. Hamilton’s contribution to American political thought is significant. He ranks as an equal to men like Jefferson,Franklin, Madison, and Adams.