ipl-logo

Exemplification Essay: California Police's Torrantless Search

483 Words2 Pages

In the state of California Police may search your cellphone or conduct a search of your computer or hard drive, tablet computer, or other electronic device without a warrant, with consent of the individual, carrying a device across an international border and or in a crisis circumstance, where police can demonstrate a quick need to inquiry a gadget to seek after an escaping suspect, or help somebody who is genuinely harmed or debilitated with imminent injury.

Example: Andrea and José are two police detectives working undercover to infiltrate a criminal street gang . Members of the gang they are working with find out about their identity. They attempt to kill José, but he escapes. José then contacts his colleagues at the police department. They tell him that …show more content…

The police could search your cellphone without a warrant before June 25, 2014, while you were under lawful arrest, prosecutors could use the evidence against you.
Warrentless cellphone searches incident to arrest were legal in California prior to June 2014.
Example: In 2013, Paul is arrested on a traffic violation.
Police search his mobile phone (without a warrant) at the time of his arrest. They find child pornography images among his digital photos.
Paul is charged under California 's child pornography laws.
In June 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court clarifies the law on cell phone searches making it clear that the warrantless search of Paul 's phone is now illegal.
But because the police who searched Paul 's phone were acting in good faith, in accordance with California law as it was at the time the images can still be admitted as evidence against Paul.
I think that California laws on search and seize on electronic devices are fair. No police can search without a warrant with the exemption of the metions above. I always think that if it looks suspicios it should a cause to search and seize, I know that might make people powerless but I bet more people will be behind bars if police can make search without

Show More
Related

  • Supreme Court Case: Riley Vs. California

    1346 Words  | 6 Pages

    The writ questioned “Whether or under what circumstances the Fourth Amendment permits police officers to conduct a warrantless search of the digital contents of an individual’s cell phone seized from the person at the time of arrest”, SCOTUSblog.com; and it was granted on January 17, 2014 in part because Federal and State Courts had openly divided opinions over this issue. Riley v. California was argued on April 29, 2014 and a decision was made on June 25, 2014. The Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. declared by a unanimous decision that a warrantless cell phone search violates the Fourth Amendment right to privacy. The court stated that the warrantless search exception (SITA) does not apply to this case because digital data store in an electronic device cannot be used as a weapon to harm officers. Although, the court recognizes that possible evidence stored on a cell phone may be wiped remotely, it also acknowledges that it could be avoided by disconnecting the cell phone from the network and placing it in a Faraday bag.

    Read More

  • Chimel Vs. California Case Study

    455 Words  | 2 Pages

    They have also said that it is reasonable for any officer to do an immediate area search of where that individual is to make sure that they can not grab anything for a weapon like for example a knife. The Supreme Court clearly notes in its opinion that such searches have to happen in the immediate area of arrest and any such search outside that area must be made with a search warrant. In Chimel case the officers could have patted down Chimel and then done a search of the immediate area to make sure that no weapons were hiding around. But once they began looking all around the house that requires a search warrant. The Supreme Court reversed the California Supreme Court’s

    Read More

  • Summary: The Case Of Sam Wardlow

    899 Words  | 4 Pages

    This applies to Sam Wardlow’s situation in which evidence was founded illegally without a proper search warrant. Also, the weapon that was found in Sam’s bag does not relate to any prior crime that may connect him to. This is not in anyway, allowed for officer Nolan to have even stopped Mr.Wardlow. Possibly, if Sam was connected to a crime beforehand and if the officers did have a proper search warrant. Then there is no way Sam’s rights were violated.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Ted Chimel V. The State Of California

    488 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the Fourth Amendment, a person has rights against unreasonable searches and seizures, any search in the Plaintiff home beyond his person and the area within his immediate control is unreasonable. (2) When the police officers arrested Chimel and search him, this all was legal, but when they started searching the house, this was illegal. They should have gone back down to the station and attain a search warrant to search the house for evidence. Therefore the evidence that was seized should be suppressed because they did not have a search warrant.

    Read More

  • Chapter 4: Criminal Investigatory Search Warrants

    579 Words  | 3 Pages

    Chapter 4 is titled "Criminal Investigatory Search Warrants. " Search warrant laws are found in the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. The elements of a search warrant include: (1) an order in writing, (2) issued by a proper judicial authority, (3) in the name of the people, (4) directed to a law enforcement officers, (5) commanding the officer to search for certain personal property, and (6) commanding the officer to bring that property before the judicial authority named in the warrant. Neutral judicial officers such as clerks of court, magistrates, complaint justices, judges, and justices of the peace are allowed to issue search warrants in their permitted jurisdictions. They must have probable cause before they can authorize a search warrant, which is usually done through an affidavit submitted by the law

    Read More

  • Mark James Knights Case Study

    829 Words  | 4 Pages

    United States v. Mark James Knights, 219 F. 3d 1138 Issue: The issue involved in this case is whether the respondents Fourth Amendment rights were infringed upon when law enforcement searched his home without a warrant. Even though respondent agreed to the terms of probation following release, which included searches of his person or premises with or without a warrant (The United States Department of Justice, 2014). Rule: The rule of law in regards to Knights probation conditions following release state that Knights would “submit his person, property, residence, vehicle, personal effects, to be searched at any time, with or without a search warrant, warrant of arrest or reasonable cause by any probation officer or law enforcement officer” (Karagiozis et al., 2005 p. 223).

    Read More

  • How Do Phone Snooping Violate The 4th Amendment

    248 Words  | 1 Pages

    A phone with bank information can be a top prize for a treacherous police officer. They can go to your home, text contacts, even steal identities if you put enough information on alleged “secure” personal devices. Phone snooping violates the 4th amendment, which says "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”. When Gregory Diaz, a California resident who was seen participating a drug deal, was ordered to hand over his phone to an officer without a warrant, it violated the amendment. The Supreme Court, when notified about the case, decided that Diaz’s case was an exception to the 200 y/o rule.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Stingray In The United States

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    The judge in the specific Milwaukee case stated that “A person wanted on probable cause (and an arrest warrant) who is taken into custody in a public place where he had no legitimate expectation of privacy cannot complain about how the police learned his location” This argument doesn’t make much sense if you change it to be about something other than a phone. If the police searched the man’s house without a warrant in order to learn his location, then in court any evidence that they obtained within the house would be thrown out. The judge is pretty much

    Read More

  • Dk Dbq Analysis

    742 Words  | 3 Pages

    These actions did not go by what was established by an earlier, similar case, and by performing the scan with no warrant, the government did not allow DLK to conduct private activities in his own home. Although some argue that the government’s actions were acceptable because they only scanned what was visible to the public, they still used a device not readily available to the public to see inside DLK’s home. The government’s actions were unacceptable, and a warrant should have been obtained prior to performing the search in order to make it

    Read More

  • Fifth Amendment Pros And Cons

    814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Pleading the Fifth Technology seems to come hand in hand with modernity. It has made most tasks that used to take days to complete much easier. Technology has also improved the channels of communication. The invention of the modern day smart cellphone coupled with social media networking has allowed mankind to be in constant contact with one another from across the globe.

    Read More

  • What Are The Arguments Against The 4th Amendment

    299 Words  | 2 Pages

    Apple is trying to protect the American people that own any apple product from the FBI. The FBI wants apple to unlock the phone from the San Bernardino 's but Apple is not doing it because it is against the 4th amendment. Since the FBI can’t get into it because Apple can not give permission to the FBI, also they don’t have any reason to look at the phone so Apple did not allow tat to happen. My opinion on this matter is that apple is doing the right thing, if the government was able to get a hold of all the information that a single person had on their phone, I am pretty sure people would be embarrassed because of all the personal information on their phones. If Apple gave them the right to look through their phone than the 4th amendment would be compromised and then that can start an up riot.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment

    427 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cell phone can unveil information within our call history, text messages, pictures, and even internet searches. Access to our cell phones is like access to our lives. No matter how much time passes, the fourth amendment continues to

    Read More

  • Private Search Account: The Rowley Case

    108 Words  | 1 Pages

    Professor Corley, I do believe in the private search document. With the Rowley case, I do believe it should apply. Since the father gave permission to come into the house and handed the officer the items willingly, I do believe that it was a legal search. Rowley had given his parents full permission to watch his belongings which meant that since the items were in the truck in the possession of the parents then it would have been a legal search. Also with his father willingly let the officer in and handed the items over to the officer wilingly then there was no need for a search

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Patriot Act

    783 Words  | 4 Pages

    Should the US government have the right to track every single phone call we ever make? Does that sound like a good enough reason to try and prevent terrorist attacks on our country? Congress passed a law called the USA Patriot Act in 2001, 45 days after 9/11. This act is a series of laws were passed in an attempt to prevent terrorist attacks in the future. There are different ideas on whether the USA Patriot Act is a constitutional act or if it is a complete violation of the US Constitution.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Stop And Frisk

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    An officer may only be allowed to search a person 's personal belongings if their reasoning is associated with a lawful arrest and if they have a probable cause to search (Matthews). After it being a huge deal in New York, other cities and states began embracing the use of stop-and-frisk as it began growing around the United States. In the 1950s police officials in other cities took up, and expanded, the stop-and-search tactics by using the LAPD to embrace the theory of crime

    Read More

More about Exemplification Essay: California Police's Torrantless Search

Open Document