I agree with your post because I do think that our founding father would not agree on the expansion of powers of the president. The three branches of our government was created by our founding father in order to balance out the power of the president, so that neither one branch can have too much power over the nation. When they crafted this idea they had seen other country where there is only one prime minister (North Korea and Russia for example) that overseen every action of a nation which the power was too powerful and decision making can be challenging for the citizens when they cannot vote on new law and regulation.
There are many checks and balances placed upon each of the three government branches. These checks and balances were created to insure that each branch would have nearly equal power. In this way, no branch will be able to rise above the others in power. This system has worked very effectively over the past years, however, there have been several situations over the past years in which this system has been challenged. Leaders of the Executive branch such as William Howard Taft, or Franklin D. Roosevelt have tried to expand the power of the executive branch.
As James Madison put it in Federalist No.51, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” The branches were intended to check each other lest they become too powerful. If the president claimed supreme war power as commander in chief, he could essentially go to war without a war declaration, as has historically been the case. James K. Polk, for example, acted out of the ambition to acquire new territory and used his commander in chief entitlement to instigate the Mexican American war by stationing troops on the border. The War Powers Resolution hinders “imperial presidents taking America to war… without public approval or the constitutionally required legislative sanction.”
The Founders had experienced life under the British Crown with its concentration of power in the monarchy and so disliked it that they risked their lives in a rebellion against it. They wanted to ensure that Each branch has its own power and responsibilities and play a significant role in checks and balances and separation of powers in our government and rely on each other to make sure that all of the power is equally
In 1776, our union is finally independent from Great Britain. Now that our country is an independent nation, our founding fathers are deciding which government system it is going to rule under. Certainly, our founding fathers did not want this country to be rule under a monarchy system because of the conflicts they faced with Great Britain. The founding fathers all sat together at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia to create a new kind of government that will have a minimal amount of problems. At first, the founding father created the Articles of Confederation, which is, each state maintains its own sovereignty and all rights to govern, except there were certain rights that were granted to Congress.
They had to find the perfect balance for the executive branch. They could not give them too much power or else there would be an opportunity for tyranny and the possibility of another monarchy, but on the other hand, the branch had to possess enough power to do something and make a change. The problem faced with the articles of confederation was a lack of power and this cannot be fixed with more lack of power. Pinckney said, “How far do you intend to go in reducing the power of the states?” (Page 69).
“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.
Any additions to the powers listed are unconstitutional and potentially dangerous. The constitution in of itself establishes a government with limited powers. Such interpretation ensures that judges and lawmakers will not become tyrannical
This concern was evident in the many checks and balances and the separation of powers in our federal government. Madison makes the separation of powers evident in Federalist Paper 48 because he states “power properly belonging to one of the departments ought not to be directly and completely administered by either of the other departments” (Hamilton et al. 305). This idea portatins to each of the branches having their own general duties with the Executive branch enforcing the laws, the legislative branch writing the laws, and the judicial branch interpreting the laws. Madison also demonstrates why the government needs checks on its power in Federalist Paper 51 because the government needs to be able to control the people but also it has to control itself since we are not governed by angels (Hamilton et al. 319). These ways to control the government are evident in Article 1, Section 3 as the “Senate shall have the sole power to try all Impeachments” and in Article 1, Section 7 which gives the President the power to veto bills (Hamilton et al. 546).
Many are taking a gander at an approach to change the framework and others might want to get rid of the framework Understanding the variables that justified the formation of the framework is fundamental. At the point when the constitution was being made, the designers needed to abstain from making a solid official branch. One thought the designers made was to have congress straightforwardly pick the president. Be that as it may, the thought was rejected on the grounds that some felt that settling on this decision would be excessively troublesome and leave ill will in
Manifest Destiny is a unique, yet mysterious fundamental series of events in American history. No other country’s history contains such an eventful history as the United States. Amy Greenberg’s book, Manifest Destiny and American Territorial Expansion, provides documented evidence that settlers believed they were destined for expansion throughout the continent. In other words, many religious settlers believed that it was a call from God for the United States to expand west. On the other hand, people believed that Manifest Destiny vindicated the war against Mexico.
It is too much power for one branch to have. While Separation of Powers have been challenged, it is still a crucial part of the U.S.
If not our country will continue to be a chaos. By dividing the powers into three branches we allow not only one person to have a decide what is right, but many people get to decide what they believe it’s right
I think the executive and legislative branches, as well as the judiciary, should possess the power to declare what the Constitution means because it is a way to balance power, instead of one branch having the most power and the other having the least amount of power. Alexander Hamilton’s quote states, “A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belonged to them to ascertain its meaning.” When relaying to this quote, the constitution is important, which needs to be advised by all branches instead one one because it can be a mundane law. Also, having one branch gaining all the power and rights will anger citizens, such as the judicial review.
In recent years there has been debate on whether or not the president has too much power. The president 's power has increased over the years, I believe that this increase has given the president way too much power. The amount of power that the president has, can cause total destruction and can manipulate people into doing things that they do not actually believe in. A president should not have some of the powers that he possess, but they are given to him simply because he is the leader of the country. In my opinion the president should be allowed certain powers in order to run the country properly, he is also the leader of the country which grants him the right to have certain powers according to the constitution.
(The Three Branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” In conclusion, the constitution protected us from tyranny using the three methods,Equal Representation from all the States, Federalism, and the system of checks and balances. The framers succeeded in creating a well built constitution because all three methods have created security that no tyrant, or tyranny would