The basic demand of the edict was that all Roman citizens were to give sacrifices to the gods for the safety of both the emperor and empire. The motive behind Decius’ edict is rather unclear and debated to this day (Novak 121). Nathan described the edict as a wide scale attack on the growing Christian religion as a part of is conservatism. Two of the possible motives in Nathan’s understanding was the religions growth or because of a grudge against Philip. Philip was secretly a Christian which may have influenced Decius’ negative feelings toward Christianity.
A man to which through Tacitus’ writings the manifestation of Roman perfection. Tacitus view of the flaws of Roman society were it’s ambition. Greed and self service to individual rather than service to the commonwealth. Tacitus’ represented the Britons response to the Roman presence in Britons by bringing up comparisons of slavery. Tacitus views of the Roman empire could suggest
Introduction The city-states of Athens and Greece were ruled by a diverse range of governments. Under these were the monarchy, the aristocracy, the tyranny, the oligarchy and the democracy. In this paper we will compare and contrast these 5 forms of governments in ancient Greek city-states. The Monarchy A monarchy is a type of government most recognizable by the fact that power rests in the hands of one person. Usually in the past, monarchies have been ruled by kings, together with his advisors.
Were we to remove a man, as if he had been Marallus or Caesetius” (Suentonius 31). This statement is evidence of the change is Julius approach to clementia. Julius change use of absolute authority and change in attitude to get rid of the tribunes would have been unpopular with the Senate and the people of Rome, to further reason for his removal of power. Additionally, Suentonius refers to the consul where they elected to get rid of the tribunes, some of the people were dissatisfied with Julius’s decision. An example of Caesar demenstarating “guilty of the same luxury in the language he publicly used, as Titus Ampius informs us; according to whom he said, “The Republic is nothing but a name, without substance or reality.
Ancient Greece had many different forms of government within its many eras and countries. To name a few of these governing styles you had monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and the founding of democracy. Overall each governing style can be found within a few time points throughout Greek history. Some Greek governments established mixes of different governing styles. Such as Sparta which had a mix of Monarchy, Oligarchy, aristocracy, and tyranny.
Therefore, some groups complained or even revolted against Czar Peter I’s foreign concepts. Despite the complaints and completely new ideas that Peter forced upon his own people, he showed those who rebelled no mercy. Peter the Great was quick to shut down all and any religious activity; Peter continued to force Western culture and ideals upon Russia. Overall, Peter the Great encountered a few problematic incidents; however, he maintained complete control and overcame problems that
With the newly established representatives, it was truly impossible to cap Caesar’s growing power. Additionally, to solidify this alliance, Caesar “offered [Pompey] his sister’s granddaughter, Octavia, in marriage,” utilizing the tactic of peace weaving in order to get what he wanted to stimulate his own political gain (Suetonius, 41). He also made an agreement among the three of them in which “no step should be taken in public affairs that did not suit any one of the three” (Suetonius, 39). Caesar was careful to take great precaution in all of his affairs, not because anyone was particularly his friend, but mainly because he was looking out for himself. The First Triumvirate eventually fell due to Caesar’s extensive governorship in Gaul and Pompey’s eagerness to join the Optimate Faction.
Many people debate over which form of government is best. In his In Praise of the Emperor Constantine, Eusebius Pamphilus argues that monarchy is the superior. Monarchy reflects God’s created order. There is one God, not two or three, and thus there ought to be one ruler (WH: 357, 27). Eusebius argues that because God is divine and perfect and holly, and because He (God) created humans in His own image, humans ought to emulate God and His order (WH: 358, 11).
The government was also known to be violent from time to time, which influenced the ruler to use terrorism as a means of gaining power (Andress 105). Therefore, Robespierre might not have a true tyrant for his time because of his commitment the ideals of the French Republic
Before his presidency, Thomas Jefferson was extremely critical of a strong national government. He despised the government exercising its power on the citizens, and frequently condemned decisions involving the use of such powers, as with the excise. (A) He believed that the central government should be given little power, while most authority should be delegated to the people and states. (B) The decisions he made often directly inhibited the function of the economy for which he aimed.