ipl-logo

Tsar Nicholas II

1207 Words5 Pages

Question- How far can it be argued that the Tsar was able to control Russia before 1905 through the effective use of fear?
Intro-
Tsar Nicholas II came to the throne in 1894, he was an autocrat which meant he had complete power and didn’t have to consult anyone else before he made important decisions. He was not elected he felt like he had a right to rule as he believed he had been given the position by God himself. Anyone who questioned his power was sentenced without trial and many ended up being exiled to Siberia. This essay will argue the factors of how the Tsar kept control of Russia through fear by using the Okhrana and Cossacks but also other factors that contributed like the Russian Orthodox church, Russification and the Tsars politics …show more content…

They censored all newspapers and books, before anything was published it had to be sent to the government for approval, this happened because the Tsar wanted to make sure any information publicized was not opposing the Tsar in anyway so any content the Okhrana felt was dangerous towards Nicholas himself or his position as Tsar was banned. The Okhrana would use surveillance and informers to spy on the people of Russia and political groups. If anyone was to be found with any anti-tsarist material or heard speaking badly about the Tsar they could be executed or exiled to Siberia. Historian Orlando Figes says “No subject of the tsar regardless of his rank or class, could sleep securely in his bed in the knowledge that his house would to be subject to a search or he himself to arrest”. When the Okhrana could not cope the Cossacks were brought in. Fear was a great factor to contributing to the Tsar keeping control of Russia. The Tsar and his government believed that with having such a large empire to keep under control they needed an immense army to deal with any rebellions or uprisings, they maintained around a one and a half million troops to control the empire.(History course notes M Hughes and C Hume). The most brutal and fierce were the Cossacks, they were armed with sharp sabres. The Cossacks specialized in breaking up large mobs by butchering anyone who did not run away fast …show more content…

The Tsar took orders from no one and did not care about the populations views, he was head of the church meaning he would always have it on his side and paid priests for their propaganda. The Okhrana would censor and eliminate anything that posed a threat towards Nicholas or his position. When this did not work he relied on the fierce Cossacks to deal with

Show More
Related

  • The Challenges Of Czar Ivan Iv

    349 Words  | 2 Pages

    Czar Ivan IV inherited the throne, which made him the ruler of Russia. He was considered an absolute monarch and killed those who opposed him. Czar Ivan rises to power by expanding Russian territory. By expanding the Russian territory, he accomplished in taking over the influential regions of Kazan and Astrakhan. The challenges that Czar Invan IV faced were drought, famine, and the loss of his wife, which left him mentally unstable.

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq Essay

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.

    Read More

  • Barrack Obama's Ivan IV: Ivan The Terrible

    793 Words  | 4 Pages

    What would you do if I told you that our own president, Barrack Obama, was a bloodthirsty murderer who raped women as if it were a casual way to spend his free time? Though this idea may seem controversial to some, in early Russia this statement had zero exaggeration to it. If the deaths of thousands of people due to psychological illness and paranoia is a normal sight to see in your eyes on a regular basis, then you might have lived between 1533 and 1584. During this time, Ivan Chetvyorty Vasilyevich (Ivan IV) reigned in Russia. The first appointed Czar of Russia, Ivan IV, better known as Ivan the Terrible, had a disturbed childhood which led to a severely unstable mental state and brutal rule.

    Read More

  • Westernization In Russia

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    Inbetween the years 1450-1750 CE, Western Europe and Russia have gone through several political and economic changes, though they have existed in different districts of Europe. Both Western European and Russian cultural patterns have been influenced by their enlightenment periods, bringing an era of revolution and economic/ intellectual advancement. However, though they shared this in common, Western Europe went through the Renaissance, a time of new styles and inventions in secular arts and sciences that challenged popular religion, while Russian was becoming a major European power through Westernization forces brought on by tsars, like Peter the Great. Many of Western Europe’s innovations in finance and government started developing during

    Read More

  • Human Rights Dbq

    451 Words  | 2 Pages

    Joseph Stalin instilled a totalitarian government into Ukraine’s society. Moreover, Stalin tried to cut any threats that would affect his plan in making Russia a communist utopia, by using the secret police. (document 1) But, the Ukrainians were independent, rebellious people who believed strongly in their culture and

    Read More

  • Who Is Peter The Great Ruler Of Russia

    1581 Words  | 7 Pages

    Peter the Great of Russia was a strong and absolute ruler. Czar Peter I used a form of absolute rule called autocratic rule. This means that he ruled with unlimited authority over his subjects and land (Mendrala, 41). Many people identify Peter the Great as a tremendous modernizer of Russia. Peter the Great is responsible for Russia’s westernization; he enforced Western ideas, technology, and culture.

    Read More

  • 1917 Russian Revolution Dbq

    1271 Words  | 6 Pages

    With no signs of the czar’s attempt to solve the complications, Russia banded together and filled the streets with strikes and riots. A revolution was peaking among the peasants. The uprising brought Nicholas ll no choice but to abdicate his throne. This was an opportunity

    Read More

  • 1917 Revolution Dbq

    1224 Words  | 5 Pages

    During the 20th century, Russia was experiencing turmoil in war and the country was deeply affected with Tsar Nicholas’s wrong decisions and lack of experience in politics. After the 1917 revolution in Russia, Lenin became the ruler of Russia and the USSR and proved to be the best Russian ruler of the 20th century. Before then, Tsarism dominated and Nicholas II was in power until he foresaw many revolutions against his methods of ruling. He remained as the supreme ruler and did not take actions for reforms. However, after the 1917 revolution, which Lenin masterminded, the Tsar was overthrown and the Bolsheviks established a stable government which took control in Russia.

    Read More

  • Imperialism In Russia

    505 Words  | 3 Pages

    When the officers and newly literate members of the Russian military chased Napoleon through Western Europe they were inevitably exposed to enlightened ideals and the ever increasing voice of the people in political circles. Russia at this time consisted a small number nobility and an overwhelming majority of serfs and peasant farmers. Power was entirely centralized towards on the Tzar and the early signs of the citizens demanding for representation in government and abolition of serfdoms began following the 1812-1813 campaigns. 14 Secondly as an unintended side effect of Napoleon’s invasion the Russian military and to a lesser extent its citizen experienced for the first time a sense of militaristic superiority and dependency on the tactics used.

    Read More

  • Opposition Groups In Russia In 1894

    815 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1894, Tsar Nicholas II inherited the Russian throne from his father, Alexander III, who was known to be a strong and tall man and also used repression as a way of keeping political order and stopping any opposition to his rule. On the other hand, Nicholas was a timid, easily swayed man with a smaller frame than his father and appeared weaker, however, when Nicholas came to the throne in 1894, he continued his father’s policy of Russification. The policy of Russification tried to impose Russian ideals on ethnic and religious minorities within the empire. This policy aimed to loosen opposition to Tsardom and to promote the superiority of everything Russian. This was not the case as the policy alienated minorities and they were treated as inferior

    Read More

  • Who Was Ioseph Stalin Monster

    1828 Words  | 8 Pages

    The new government was more oppressive than the Tsardom, shutting down many hostile newspapers and pro-Tsardom movements. After quitting the Pravda, Stalin was appointed to People’s Commissar of the Nationalities and signed an act giving more rights to minorities in Russia. After the Bolsheviks came to power much of the army revolted against them, starting the Russian Civil War. Due to the civil war, food was scarce and people were beginning to starve. Stalin was put in charge of food procurement in Tsaritsyn.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ivan Iv And Putin

    301 Words  | 2 Pages

    Russia has had numerous rulers throughout history. Two of the rulers stick out in particular. They used similar strategies to get their ways. They used their power to control others. These two rulers did similar things to get their way.

    Read More

  • Was The Russian Revolution Inevitable Essay

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution could have been halted or prevented if, in early times, Russia was given a czar with more experience

    Read More

  • Russian Revolution Causes

    1500 Words  | 6 Pages

    This was one of the major factors that led to his demise, he was a weak leader and commander but also he was running a very undemocratic government and this was shown with the creation of the Duma. The first Duma was established after the defeat in the war to the Japanese in an attempt by the Tsar to retain power. The Tsar however did not expect when he offered free elections to the Duma that the electorates would begin to criticise him and demand change. This resulted in the collapse of the first Duma which showed that the people hadn’t a right to an opinion and nothing could be changed as long as Tsar Nicholas II was in charge. The Duma was never going to succeed in making change as it would be dissolved if

    Read More

  • What Caused The Russian Revolution

    919 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was a very sad period in Russia. Sad because people died, got hurt and lost family members, all because they were not given the rights they were born with, and fought hard to get it. It all started because of Absolute Monarchism. The rulers in Russia were called Czars, and they had absolute power. Russia’s last Czar was Nicholas the II, and he became a Czar with very little training, because when his dad died he inherited the throne.

    Read More

More about Tsar Nicholas II

Open Document