Explain Plato's Theory Of Knowledge

1189 Words5 Pages
1 For Plato the chief distinction between knowledge and opinion is that knowledge is fixed, absolutely and eternally true (correct), while opinions are changeable and “unanchored.” Only in the realm of becoming can opinions change from true to false.
2 Plato wanted the theory of Forms to provide a rational explanation of how knowledge is possible. The forms are the foundation of Plato’s bold answer to the sophist’ skeptical assault on knowledge and to their relativistic rejection of universal (absolute) truths. Defense of absolute, unchanging truth is difficult under the best circumstances. Plato knew that unless he could offer more than faith in the existence of absolutes, more authoritarians and dogmatic pronouncement her would fail as a philosopher. Plato reasoned that if he could solidify establish that knowledge is possible and the knowledge exists, then he could also justify and preserve real (objective) distinction between right and wrong, true and false, better and worse.
3 There are four basic level of reality. Higher form this is the level of pure intelligence or understanding. Here the soul directly apprehends truth at its highest level. Next is the Lower forms this is the level of reasoning; specifically, mathematical thinking and deductive reasoning. Next is sensible object level, this is the level of belief or common opinions about physical objects, moral, politics practical affairs. Next is the level of images this is the level of illusion, dominated by
Open Document