This level of respect between the public and epidemiology is essential. In order to help the public and ensure they have the most current evidence based medical advice and knowledge of health events, the public and health care field must have a solid base relationship. This is achieved by epidemiologist by adhering to ethical standards without deviation. If the public doesn’t feel safe and respected, why would any community participate with studies or observations. It is because of society and communities that we can determine best health practices and provide
The subjects have the right to expect the information they provided to the researcher will be treated confidentiality. It is the responsibility of the researcher to keep the confidentiality of the subjects, protect them and avoid any harm that might happened to them. According to the case study, Dr.David should not publish the pictures of the subjects without approval of the subjects as he should keep the confidentiality of the subjects. The most safety way for Dr.David to avoid any ethical issues that might happened is seek for IRB approval before publish the
One of the main ethical concerns to be addressed when conducting research is that participants have to be clearly informed about “the purpose, aims, use of results, and likely consequences of the study” (Stringer, 2013 p. 89); in other words, it is vital to obtain the informed consent of participants. In AR, where more control is given to the participants than in other forms of research, consent is a form of agreement between the participants and the researcher (ibid, p. 90). The researcher needs to inform the participants explicitly about all the research activities and participants should be to continue to ask questions during and after the AR project has been completed. Participants should feel entirely free to decline participation in the project, and it is the researcher's duty to explain that their willingness or refusal to participate will not affect their academic achievement in any way. The same conditions should be in place for continuing involvement, where participants should be aware that they are free to withdraw from the study at any given time.
The APA established ethical standards for internal factors including competence, privacy/confidentiality, record keeping and fees, education and training, and assessments for the purpose of government and/or professional associations, employers and other funding bodies that require accurate and appropriate records to be kept of the contact that they have with clientele. The vital aspect of keeping records is an of immense importance to the professional world. Simply put, the mere reason is that professionals need means of accountability for the services that they provide to others. They need a method of showing accuracy, and up-to-date data on their services provided. The aforementioned data would in fact best be served and supported through records.
Failures must be identify and solve in the early stage of design, and the data must be properly consolidated and documented to prevent any misled of information. Informed consent should not be violated and all information should be make cleared to the participants who opt to participate in experiment. Lastly, engineers should uphold the dignity of their profession and to adopt the utmost standards of their professional
Duffy and Chenail (2008) stated when using a research approach in counseling, the counselor needs to make sure they understand the value and the purpose of the research study. The research needs to be appropriate to the client needs. Therefore, the counselor should be aware of the role and the responsibilities when using research for their client that they might not be any biases or cultural sensitive towards the client, if the counselor does not feel comfortable using the research the counselor can also reference “The Code of Ethics of the American Counseling Association”. Sherpis and Daniels (2017) specified when a counselor is conducting a research study or using a research they should consider the dignity and welfare of the client. The counselor needs to make sure to respect clients at all times.
In addition, they need to be alert, answer questions promptly and intelligently. The expert witness must not appear combative or annoyed at questions especially during cross-examination. Lastly, they must be ethical, display objectively, not advocacy (Wells, 2012). Staggeringly, I would make sure the expert witnesses, in this case, would have extraordinary presentations, drawing a roadmap directly to Wayne Williams. Unquestionably, I would have a presentation of the fiber evidence displaying each fiber and showing the fiber match that tied Wayne Williams to this case, leaving no room for speculation.
How to Interpret the Standards of Ethical Coding" means to me is as a coder job it is very important that they code properly. These standards mean the coders should be accurate, honest, fallow the guidelines and policies and interpret the providers notes. Coding improperly would not jut affect us put it will affect as whole such the healthcare team, the patients, organization and the public as a whole. To me this means its very important to not just assume that this might be the right thing to code. its significant to check with the provider before doing anything we are not sure of because this might lead to big problem.
I think that there are, the most obvious being that Potter’s resignation will ensure that other academics are sure to ensure that their opinions and articles are well supported with evidence. The message is certainly sent that articles, especially those on controversial topics, have to be properly supported with evidence that supports the opinions given. Even considering this, I do not think that this consequence undermines my argument. In order to get this positive consequence, Potter does not have to be pushed to resign, but can be disciplined in other ways that show the importance of proper evidence. I think that the initial outrage was actually enough to create this consequence, showing academics the possible outcome of not supporting opinions on controversial topics with evidence.