ipl-logo

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words3 Pages

At the Constitutional Convention, our founding fathers met to reconstruct the Articles of Confederation, not knowing that they would create the United States Constitution, an entire new format of government. They wanted to create a government that was powerful yet restricted in certain ways, in order to create equal representation for all people. Three main compromises were made at the Constitutional Convention. These compromises were The Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the addition of the Bill of Rights. The Great Compromise was Roger Sherman’s plan, and was an attempt to resolve the conflicts between the smaller states and larger states, settling the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan called for a bicameral …show more content…

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people. It took the convincing of the Anti-Federalists to explain how the Constitution gave too much power to the central government and did not state the rights and freedoms of the people, therefore lacking a Bill of Rights. The Federalists agreed to a Bill of Rights, and later the Constitution was ratified with nine out of thirteen votes on June 21 of 1788. Soon after the Constitution was ratified, the separation of powers was understood in the United States government. The separation of powers separated each branch of government. The executive branch enforces laws, the legislative branch passes the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. The purpose of the separation was to guarantee that no branch has more power to dominate over the

Show More
Related

  • Why Was The Constitution Created By The 3/5 Compromise Strengthen The Constitution?

    795 Words  | 4 Pages

    Over 200 years ago during the summer of 1787, our great American leaders discussed, argued and compromised to create the constitution that we have today. After the failed Articles of Confederation, a weak government that had no power to tax, a new form of government was in order. Congress decided instead of changing the Articles of Confederation, they would create a brand new government at the Constitutional Convention. In this ongoing meeting 55 delegates built a constitution from scratch Many compromises were created that strengthened the constitution including the Great Compromise, separation of powers, and the amendments, however it is argued that the 3/5 Compromise weakened the constitution (Appleby). One of the major compromises

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Virginia And The Constitutional Convention

    333 Words  | 2 Pages

    This plan state that their should be equal representation regardless of the population of the state. Because of this, there was the Great Compromise. Roger Sherman proposed an idea that combined the ideas of the Virginia and New Jersey plan. This was combined in a bicameral legislature, or a two house system. Bicameralism is two houses.

    Read More

  • Explain The Various Compromises At The Constitutional Convention

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    Those were the key compromises that helped to create a perfect Constitution of the United States. The Great Compromise was the first and key compromise in the United States Constitution, which was facing a major issue such as now States was represented in Congress. There were plans called New Jersey and Virginia plans and a Compromise was reached called the Connecticut compromise as well as other plans which

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Compromises Made At The Constitutional Convention

    1185 Words  | 5 Pages

    Compromises Made at the Constitutional Convention Under the Articles of Confederation the government was weak and had little success. Shay’s Rebellion led to the changing of the laws made on the government under the Articles of Confederation. It also led to a convention which introduced the idea of making a new form of government. In 1787 the Constitutional Convention awoke the ideas of making new compromises that the Founding Fathers had to face. Two of the most important compromises included the voting on president which was called the electoral college system and the decision making of how to ratify the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan

    485 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the year 1787, in the United States, the constitutional convention meet to solve the problems from the original constitution, the articles of confederation. There goal was to either write a new constitution, or amend the original constitution with a stronger central government. When the convention first started, the representatives from Virginia took a leading role and proposed the first plan, known as the Virginia Plan. With this plan, it was proposed that the articles of confederation be completely replaced with a new constitution. Many states opposed this plan and the representatives from New Jersey proposed a new plan, known as the New Jersey Plan.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    860 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the Constitutional Congress in 1787, 55 nationalist delegates discussed all aspects of the Constitution for months in order to mold it to modern American life and satisfy all or most parties. Among all other compromises that were made during the Convention, the Great Compromise was by far the most essential. The Great Compromise was brought about by the country’s need to determine how representation would be determined. Both the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan proposed promising methods of representation, such as a bi or unicameral legislation and population-based or equal representation respectively. To solve this issue of representation, the Great Compromise utilized ideas from both plans and created a bicameral legislature which included a House of Representatives based on state population and a Senate where two members of each state would represent the state's interests.

    Read More

  • The Great Compromise: Constitutional Convention In 1787

    735 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut compromise, resolved many issues having to do with representation. This agreement was made at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The debate was between large states and small states. The compromise is the number of representatives in the lower house would be decided according to the population of every state; one representative that is elected for every one thousand residents. This was changed to thirty thousand recently before the constitution was signed.

    Read More

  • One Of The Plans Presented At The Constitutional Convention

    1077 Words  | 5 Pages

    One of the plans presented at the Constitutional Convention was the Virginia Plan.  Virginia delegate Edmund Randolph presented this plan at the beginning of the Convention. He, George Washington, and the other Virginia delegates came up with this idea while waiting for the Convention to begin.   They came up with the Virginia Plan because the Articles of Confederation had many problems associated with it and the delegates wanted to fix them.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Compromises Of The Framers

    1364 Words  | 6 Pages

    . Primarily, in unit 3 we will be talking about the disagreements between the north and the south at the convention, what parts of the constitution are the result of compromises that settles disagreements between the Northern and the southern states and why we think the the framers should have made these compromises. All of these topics are about the Northern and Southern states. There was a lot of conflict of conflict between the Northern and Southern states, but the framers did find a way to solve these problems.

    Read More

  • Differences Between The Anti-Federalist And Anti Federalists

    842 Words  | 4 Pages

    A Bill of Rights was included 1791. To a limited extent to pick up the help of the Anti-Federalists, the Federalists guaranteed to include a bill of rights if the Anti-Federalists would vote in favor of the Constitution. Like how they felt about whatever is left of the proposed government, the

    Read More

  • Essay On The Great Compromise

    298 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the countless debates, the Great Compromise was what the convention would come into agreement with representation by population in the House of Representatives “The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative. ”(add footnote) The smaller states were pleased with equal representation in the Senate “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senates from each state and each Senator shall have one vote.”(add

    Read More

  • The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

    99 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Three Fifths Compromise And Commerce Compromise

    223 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Three-Fifths compromise and the Commerce Compromise were added to the constitution. Many Southern delegates asked for these two compromises because they benefited the economy and power of Southern states. Southern delegates asked for the Commerce Compromise because it affected the economy. According to the text, “An extension on the slave trade was the Commerce Compromise. Northerners wanted to give Congress unlimited power to regulate trade.

    Read More

  • What Is The Difference Between The Virginia Plan And The Great Compromise

    456 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cheyenne Higbie Kelli Brown Social Studies 3rd hour 03 October 2016 The United States Constitution     When the Founding Fathers of the United States realized that The Articles of Confederation was weak, they soon decided to form a new Constitution. Several different ideas were proposed by people from different states. These plans were then evaluated by the committee and voted on. One of the biggest debates throughout the process of revising the Articles of Confederation was representation in the Senate for all of these states.

    Read More

  • Why Was The Constitution Called A Bundle Of Compromises

    189 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Constitution was called a bundle of compromises due to the fact that the delegates to the constitutional convention were forced to make multiple compromises so all the states would agree to the constitution. The three compromises made were these: The Connecticut Compromise, The Three-fifths Compromise, and The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise. The Connecticut Compromise was an agreement made by large and small states that constructed the legislative structure and representation that each state would possess under the constitution. The Three-fifths compromise was intended for slave states that wanted to count all their slaves for population which means they would have more representation, the free states didn’t like this so they made

    Read More

More about Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

Open Document