What were our Founder's intentions for Congress and Congressional elections? The founders created the United States Congress to protect the rights of individual states and safeguard minority opinion in a system of government designed to give greater power to the national government. How did they see Congress relative to the President, and how is this dynamic playing out, especially with our understanding of Congress, elections and representation? They saw them as the word of the people. Today most people don’t see them like this or even at all. This is one of our core problem you need to fix by informing people about this more over the presidency. Is there anything new regarding the overwhelming emphasis on presidents and presidential elections
James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.
In the first continental congress was a response to the Intolerable Acts. Which states in USHistory.com that the act was the reaction to the Boston Tea Party (Pre Columbian to the New Millennium, 1). The harbor was close for trade because the owners wanted their money for the tea (Pre Columbian to the New Millennium, 1). The battle of Lexington, the British probably assume that the rebels would’ve just given up.
1.Robertson states the founding fathers were politicians because they understood how to compromise, maintain political support even while conducting unpopular political activities, and balance conflicting demands. This is epitomized in James Madison because even when he did not achieve his whole goal, he still settled for “half a loaf rather than none.” His use of political strategy and willingness to compromise, shows that he and the rest of the founding fathers were not just political philosophers, scientists, or speculators, but politicians. 2.Robertson remarks some of the key reasons the founding fathers were successful in forming a new government is because during the time period they were framing the constitution there were volatile,
Anti-federalists. The Anti-federalists were the founders of popular democracy in the United States. 4 The Anti-federalists denounced the proposed Constitution as a betrayal of the democratic spirit of 1776 and the American Revolution itself.
Chapter:2 The United States Constitution pages 87-107 Preamble: 1. Form a More Perfect Union, Establish Justice,Insure Domestic Tranquility, Provide for the Common Defense, Promote the General Welfare, Secure the Blessings of Liberty. 2. "We the people of the united states" it means that the only reason that their is a government is because of the people, and should be made to serve the people. Article:1 Legislative Branch 1.
A recurring theme of the Founding Fathers at the Constitutional Convention was regarding power. James Madison wanted the people to have a voice. “… the heart and soul of any republican society must be the representative body that enacted
Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.
After a fiercely fought revolution, the newly independent American nation struggled to establish a concrete government amidst an influx of opposing ideologies. Loosely tied together by the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen sovereign states were far from united. As growing schisms in American society became apparent, an array of esteemed, prominent American men united in 1787 to form the basis of the United States government: the Constitution. Among the most eminent members of this convention were Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. These men, held to an almost godly stature, defined the future of the nation; but were their intentions as honest as they seemed?
I believe that Congress is a very important factor that links both the citizens of America and their government together. Furthermore, the connection between these two respective parties creates a form of checks and balances. I firmly think, without hesitation, without a bondage between the two there would be tyranny among the federal government, most importantly the legislative branch. Lee Hamilton believed that people were disinterested or skeptical in Congress as they were less educated about the branch.
Why did the founding fathers decide to establish a democratic republic? Did they have anything to benefit from said democracy, or were they actually morally compelled to create a more perfect union to serve and protect all of the citizens of the united states? Although many of the founding fathers have left diaries, articles, and speeches behind for us to dissect and analyze, I believe that there is no better way to learn about a man 's character other than by observing his behavior first hand, and personally questioning him. That is why instead of going to see the Salem witch trials, being at Lincoln 's Gettysburg Address, or even watching the battle Saratoga, I would rather sit in and experience the four long months of debate and argument
The American nation as forewarned by President Washington was not destined to have two fraction but with the two paths coming about it was inevitable and their came Alexander’s Hamilton who represented the Federalists and Thomas Jefferson leading the Democratic-republicans. The Federalists were mostly bankers, merchants, manufacturers, and bankers; they were well educated and were from the New England and part of the coast. The republican were uneducated and mostly shopkeepers, artisan, backcountry farmers from the interior regions. The federalist wanted a strong central government that would control faction; this group thought of the public as ignorant and incapable of governing themselves.
At the point when our founding fathers were establishing our nation, they imagined a decentralized government that ensured our God-given rights and was established on the rule of self-administration. They took a chance with their lives, fortunes and respect to make the best country the world has ever known in view of restricted government association in the regular day to day existences of Americans. They were likewise tired of incorporated power, making the tenth Amendment to control the central government's voracious want to extend and develop. They wanted people to have a say in the government and that the government only derives its legitimate power from the consent of the governed. Even though our founding fathers could establish a good
The primary concern of the framers of the constitution was the proper and just balance of powers in order to protect against tyranny, ensure fair representation, and safeguard individual rights. The American Constitution was framed with the citizens past experience fully in mind. While under British control, American citizens were severely undercut in both federal power and representation in parliament. Parliament was insanely corrupt, purposefully taking more power for itself over the population of Britain en masse. While making the constitution the framers kept these issues in mind, holding to the firmly held belief of their colonial constituents that, as stated by Lord Acton in 1887, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
In drafting the constitution the establishing father were obviously worried to redress the insufficiencies o f thee articles of confederation under which the insubordinate provinces had been administered amid the insurgency. The articles had presented official and in addition administrative power on congress setting up in actuality parliamentary government without a prime’s pastor. The individuals who differ were consoled by the desire that Washington would be the main head of state. In the meantime their test under the British crown drove the establishing father to support less centralization of power than they saw in the British government. The constitution additionally brought congers into the bargain making process with holding from the president the selective power appreciated by European rulers to make arrangements.
In his essay ‘The founding fathers: a reform caucus in action', John P. Roche describes the Founding Fathers as practical politicians that were indeed acting on behalf the citizens they represented. Roche states the founding fathers kept in mind everyone's rights while making the Constitution. He explains how James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan. Roche describes it as a ‘Political Masterstroke'.