Would you rather have freedoms or no freedoms? One reason a democracy is better than a utopia because living in a democracy with freedoms is better because you are able to choose what YOU want to do. Another reason you are able to choose what job you think is best for yourself instead of being forced into something that may not fit you and finally, you 're able to wear what you want and be different from other people and not look the same as everyone else. For these reasons, a democratic society is better than a utopian society because in a democratic society people have freedom of choice. To start, you are able to choose what YOU want to do, instead of being told around like some robot. You are able to choose whatever you want. What type of food you want to eat, what clothes you 're going to wear today, where you 're going to go today, etc. These being things that you cannot do in a utopian society. This freedom allows you to have much more fun than you would have to live in a utopian society, and what 's the world without freedom? Also, being able to choose the job that you want is best because it allows you to do what you want to do, what makes you happy. By being able to pick your own job means that you are able to choose what, you now what will be right for …show more content…
Which means there is no uniqueness and nothing is new. A utopian society also prides itself on being near ¨perfect¨ when they have many dark secrets. For example, in Lois Lowry 's, The Giver, they claim that people are ¨released¨ when actually they are killed no matter if it´s a baby, adult or the elderly. Not to mention, if a pregnant woman has twins the one with the lesser weight is ¨released¨, this is also kept secret from most people in the
How a Utopia compares to present day In the novel Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, we are presented with a society that is abnormal from our own modern day society because of their technological advancements and different life perspectives. Although our society and the “World State” are very different, Huxley relates the two worlds throughout the novel with several meaningful quotes. Social critic Neil Postman, in his “Six Assertions”, talks about many of the topics in Brave New World and whether or not they are relevant in today’s society.
But the society still has some flaws in this utopia. A hidden dystopia, where all information is hidden. “Peace wasn't an accomplishment, it's a responsibility.” That's a quote from a near Nobel prize winner. This man didn't receive it because he declined the prize stating the quote at
Most Utopias force someone to do something they do not want to do. Usually Utopias have a law or rule that makes you do something you do not want to do, or keep you from doing stuff you want to do. In Harrison Bergeron it states,” George was required to wear the handicap radio at all times.” The government required this to keep everyone equal.
Utopias lose freedom, there is no way it can exist in a utopia. Freedom is freedom from things you don’t like. It takes away free speech, free religion, everything that you call yours is taken away because you need to share it. You can’t make your own decisions when utopias form, it’s all laid out for you. For example if you wanted to have a little get together with your closest friends you couldn’t, because everyone has to be an
Freedom gives the capability to imagine and create anything your heart yearns. A saying by Anthony Robbins says, “If you do what you've always done, you will get what you've always gotten” (Robbins). You will never be unique if you follow the crowd. This world is changing by the people who take risks to change and shape it. The world is always altering every day, whether it’s a big or small change, so why shouldn’t you?
Alexis de Tocqueville penned Democracy in America after he spent month America in the 1831, where he witnessed a new democratic system. He found it’s concepts to have unique strengths and weaknesses that he believed could be the inspiration for the new government of post-revolution France. The concepts of limiting individualism, encouraging positive associations, and moderating the tyranny of the majority that Tocqueville observed during his trip in America helped maintain the new democratic republic built after the revolution. As soon as America became free from British rule, their groundwork for their new government helped cement them as a true democracy since it contended with individualism. Tocqueville noticed that after a successful
In “Tyranny of Choice,” Barry Schwartz brings to the table the topic of choice. The common believe is more choices, equals more freedom. Under that assumption we are living in the best times then. Everything in the world has multiple options to choose from. The choices range from what type of gum you want, to the best life insurance policy for your family.
Democracy makes sure that the people have a voice in the decisions this country makes and that the liberty of the people never ceases to be. The people are capable of making the right decisions, hence the people should have a say in the government. When the government is trusted to rulers alone, it is destined to be corrupt. Tyranny must be avoided, and one of the most obvious solutions is giving the people the right to make decisions for
In Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville, it talks about democracy in America and its strengths and weaknesses. Having seen the failed attempts at democratic government in his home country of France, Tocqueville wanted to study a stable and prosperous democracy to gain insights into how it worked. His studies led him to conclude that the movement toward democracy and equality of conditions was a universal phenomenon and a permanent historical tendency that could not be stopped. Since this democratic trend was inevitable, Tocqueville wanted to analyze it in order to determine its strengths and dangers so that governments could be formed to reinforce democracy 's strengths while counteracting its weaknesses. Even though Democracy in America
Persuasive essay During this unit we have read many short stories about Utopian societies and living with alternative identities. A Utopian Society is where everything runs smoothly and ]lawful while governed Carefully and equally. It is not possible to achieve a Utopian society in which every citizen is equal because Not everyone is a law abiding Citizen. So order can never be maintained.
In the Brave New World, a book written by Aldous Huxley,, he writes about a utopian future where humans are genetically created and pharmaceutically anthesized. Huxley introduces three ideals which become the world's state motto. The motto that is driven into their dystopian society is “Community, Identity and Stability.” These are qualities that are set to structure the Brave New World. Yet, happen to contradict themselves throughout the story.
But in a dystopia, these things are taken away from the people. When comparing the dystopia to our life, it shows that freedom and being in control of your own life is what separates a dystopia from a utopia. Another example of a dystopian government controlling the people is during the tests that everyone has to take to determine their faction, the people are not allowed to share their results, even if they are positive. Tris isn 't even allowed to share with her
The utopian society in the Brave New World can be compared and contrasted between our contemporary society using individualism, community and the human experience. The fictional novel by Aldous Huxley, published in 1932, is about a utopian society where people focus stability and community over individuality and freedom, but an outsider is introduced to intervene with the operation of the utopian state. In the contemporary world, people need to show individuality in their communities in order to survive, and to be human, one must show emotion, which is the opposite in the Brave New World. Individualism is very important in the contemporary world, but in the utopian state, individuals are conditioned to be the same as everyone else. They do not know how to be themselves.
Speedier process for the framework, Law making process less difficult, Less space for debasement are the benefits of Totalitarian while Liberal Democracy points of interest are Elected agents, Limits government powers. Totalitarian has bad marks like Power not concentrated, Slow process for the framework while; Power not concentrated, Slow process for the framework are the detriments of Liberal Democracy
Throughout time, the concept of “democracy” has been misunderstood and misused by the majority of governments around the world. In the Ecuadorian case, despite suffering innumerable dictatorships in command of several presidents such as José Maria Velasco Ibarra or Guillermo Rodríguez Lara, democratic ideas have prevailed and continue to evolve through the history and through the time. In fact, nowadays democracy is the principal political system in this country, in which the notion of popular sovereignty can be recognized. However, it is not clear what kind of democracy the Republic of Ecuador has. So, in order to clarify what was said before, it will be taken into consideration: (1) the definition of democracy according to three important authors, (2) the principal characteristics of a democracy and the two main types of democracy: (3) direct and (4) representative.