Summary Of Accidental Discoveries In Science By John Gale
I argue that Gale presents a logical, convincing argument as to why accidental discoveries do not exist in science. In this essay, I will describe Gale’s definition of a discovery, and explain what he means by “accidental discoveries cannot be made in science.” Then, I will support this statement by using examples to demonstrate that accidental discoveries are indeed not possible.
Gale claims that “discoveries can happen only to those whose conceptual systems are somehow prepared to recognize what it is that will be eventually discovered.”(pg. 141) By this, he means that one will not recognize what they are looking for if they don’t know what they are looking for. In other words, if one comes across something by accident, their mind will not be prepared to recognize the objects presented to them. In simpler terms, they will not recognize the object, and will ignore it. For example, take Lavoisier’s discovery that water is composed of hydrogen and oxygen. Gale argues that Lavoisier would not have discovered or verified the composition of water if he had not posited it. In other words, if Lavoisier did not already have a preconceived notion of the substances which combine to form water, he would not have
…show more content…
On the other hand, in the first scenario, the assistant does not know what result to expect, so all he can think of is that he has done something wrong. He does not fathom that he might have discovered something. Thus, although the last two examples may seem like accidental discoveries, they share one thing in common- the person who makes the discovery is prepared, and ready to recognize that which is placed before them (even if it is not the result that they expected). If this is not the case, then a discovery cannot be
John Barry Rhetorical Analysis Essay
426 Words | 2 PagesHe compares scientist work to the unknown. “All scientist exist on the frontier. The best among them move deep into a wilderness.” Barry explains that science is the the act of exploring the unknown, also he establishes synonyms (frontier and wilderness). Communicating that science occurs in the unknown, only those courageous enough may conquer.
Book Summary: The Ghost Map
1517 Words | 7 PagesJohnson is interested not only in how groundbreaking theories
The Perimeter Of Ignorance By Neil Degrasse Tyson
743 Words | 3 PagesThe issue on whether religion and science can work together has been debatable for centuries. Neil DeGrasse Tyson in his article the Perimeter of Ignorance argues that science and religion cannot coexist. In his article, the author explains that religion is all about the Bible and the Bible primarily focuses on the explanation of the origin of the world. He puts forth the point that this concept is far different from what science is and that they do not complement each other. This essay intends to prove that religion and science can work together with no issues.
Summary Of Steven Shapin's The Scientific Revolution
898 Words | 4 PagesSteven Shapin proves his thesis throughout the book through the use of primary and secondary sources in his three different sections of the book. The first section is titled “What was it Known?”. In this section, he utilizes important figures such as Galileo and his findings about the heavens and the earth along with Aristotle, Newton, Descartes, Boyle, and others to explain the scientific ideas presented in this time period.
The Dark Side Of Science Rhetorical Analysis
792 Words | 4 PagesHeather Douglas wrote her paper "The Dark Side of Science," which was published in The Scientist and reprinted in The Norton Field Guide to Writing with Readings, which emotionally postulates that scientists should share a degree of accountable for the intentions and outcomes of their scientific discoveries, regardless of whether those present intentions and future outcomes are good- or ill-willed. Heather uses the mercurial metaphor of a carelessly thrown match to ignite the understanding of her readers to the idea of scientific answerability. Ms. Douglas also suggests that a type of regulation be put in place to distribute the burden of responsibility, although she is careful to not overtly mention any type of governmental regulation. In the end, "The Dark Side of Science" is a suppositional argument which espouses that the responsibility of the misuse of science extends up and down the spectrum of ownership. However, Douglas' position leads to a spirit of fear and not hope, holds one accountable for the evil of others, stifles creativity, proposes unrealistic regulations, and postulates that a possible evil outweighs scientific good.
Ancient Authors: Passage Analysis
618 Words | 3 PagesRecent discoveries convey an importance to the world’s history. However, different authors convey that idea in different ways. The passage,” New Discoveries in Ancient Egypt” by Bryan Brown and “The Curse of the Pharaohs” by Zahi Hawass suggests that any discovery is very helpful in the long run. On the other hand, “Cities of the Dead” by Denise Rinaldo tells the reader how the discoveries are not important unless you found everything about that topic. One thing all these stories do have in common is that they all share the idea that findings from the ancient times can give us a better understanding of our origins.
Heinrich Schliemann's Mistake In 'Lost Cities, Lost Treasure'
522 Words | 3 PagesMistakes most definitely are a key part in making discoveries. Without a mistake made, there is no way to tell if you did something correctly, and no way to prevent that same mistake from happening again in the process of innovation and discovery. In the story, “Lost Cities, Lost Treasure”, Heinrich Schliemann made the mistake of digging up the remains of Troy. The author of this story stated that Schliemann “erased important clues to Troy’s past” by digging everything up.
Perseverance In The Birthmark
739 Words | 3 PagesThroughout our lives, we as people encounter decisive perseverance that ultimately defines who we are as people, and how we are perceived by others; an enduring sequence of life brought on by humanity. In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short story “The Birthmark”, a prodigious alchemist named Aylmer experiences toilsome perseverance while attempting to remove an odious birthmark residing on the face of his beautiful, but imperfect wife Georgiana; going to extremes to assist in its removal. Aylmer performs many trials of experiments on his wife as he faces his intolerable predilection to restore perfection to his wife; forming a costly rivalry between love and science. Philosophy and science have always been significantly impactful topics throughout history, aiding in the development of new technologies and unprecedented topics; a burning passion for which Aylmer possessed within his intertwining worlds of both his wife and his laboratory. Along with Aylmer's exceptionally intimate
Write A Rhetorical Analysis Of The Scientific Method By John Barry
581 Words | 3 PagesScientific research is methodical. Created from a desire to make the unknown known, the “scientific method” was created in the 15th century based on common sense. As Barry analysis the scientific process, he says that the unknown must be made into a tool, even against one’s own ideas and beliefs. However, that concept is tenuous, so Barry uses logical situations to present the idea.
Coming To Our Senses Analysis
473 Words | 2 Pages(line 127) This quote shows that we could know more about universe and our world if we expanded our senses. But certain tools help us learn more about the
Raytheon's Great Mistakes
646 Words | 3 PagesDiscoveries in the fields of science and history excite almost everyone. But are mistakes a big part in finding archaeological sites or scientific discoveries? Mistakes are the reason we discover new things, or old things. The microwave is a great example of of why mistakes help us find the future of something. Error and discoveries go hand in hand here, as people have learned many things from these goofs.
Pros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard
1404 Words | 6 PagesLast but not least, science is characterized by its incessant evolution in a way that a single new anomaly can easily falsify a strong scientific theory. In simple English, even experts know that there is no ultimate certainty to
An Analysis Of James Elkins's 'How To Look At Nothing'
760 Words | 4 PagesThe passage first talks about the proper conditions needed to experience the effects and phenomenons described. The author then goes on to briefly explain some malfunctions in our brains and says, “Those are ‘false positives,’ reports that there is light when there isn’t. We see light when we shouldn’t and we fail to see light when, by the
Should Creationism Be Taught In Schools Essay
966 Words | 4 PagesA theory is defined as an explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a compilation of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Theory is not scientific law, which is a natural phenomenon that has been proven as absolute truth. However, in the public-school setting, evolution, a theory concerning the Earth’s origins, is established as an indisputable fact allowing no room for other theories, specifically creationism, to be taught. These two battling theories uphold two opposing perspectives that attempt to explain the creation and development of life.
Descartes Mind Body Dualism Summary
1104 Words | 5 PagesIt embodies the insight that there is a serious muddle at the centre of the whole of Descartes theory of knowledge. He says that we do not hold a clear idea of the mind to make out much. ‘He thinks that although we have knowledge through the idea of body, we know the mind “only through consciousness, and because of this, our knowledge of it is imperfect” (3–2.7, OCM 1:451; LO 237). Knowledge through ideas is superior because it involves direct access to the “blueprints” for creation in the divine understanding, whereas in consciousness we are employing our own weak cognitive resources that
More about Summary Of Accidental Discoveries In Science By John Gale
John Barry Rhetorical Analysis Essay
426 Words | 2 PagesBook Summary: The Ghost Map
1517 Words | 7 PagesThe Perimeter Of Ignorance By Neil Degrasse Tyson
743 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Steven Shapin's The Scientific Revolution
898 Words | 4 PagesThe Dark Side Of Science Rhetorical Analysis
792 Words | 4 PagesAncient Authors: Passage Analysis
618 Words | 3 PagesHeinrich Schliemann's Mistake In 'Lost Cities, Lost Treasure'
522 Words | 3 PagesPerseverance In The Birthmark
739 Words | 3 PagesWrite A Rhetorical Analysis Of The Scientific Method By John Barry
581 Words | 3 PagesComing To Our Senses Analysis
473 Words | 2 PagesRaytheon's Great Mistakes
646 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard
1404 Words | 6 PagesAn Analysis Of James Elkins's 'How To Look At Nothing'
760 Words | 4 PagesShould Creationism Be Taught In Schools Essay
966 Words | 4 PagesDescartes Mind Body Dualism Summary
1104 Words | 5 Pages