A man has done immense evil against you and your family and now is asking you to forgive him. He is a new believer in Christ his sins of his past are forgiven by God. Would you rejoice and forgive him, or deny and live the rest of your life with hate clutching ever tighter at your heart. We can all agree that Corrie ten Boom was treated horribly at the wretched concentration camps. Some believe Corrie shouldn’t have forgiven the prison guard while others believe she should have. Corrie should have forgiven the prison guard for three reasons: Jesus died for the man, Psalm 32:1 says “blessed is the man who forgives”, and Corrie, as a Christian, knew it was the right to forgive.
The first reason Corie should have forgiven the prison guard is that Jesus died for the man. His past no longer matters because his sins are forgiven by God. Corrie will be forgiven as well by God as says in Mathew 6:14 “For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.”
…show more content…
Pardoning the prison patroller would bring compassion to Corrie for him. She would feel kindness and praising for him as a born-again believer. Jesus says in Mathew 5:44 to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute you. The third reason Corrie should have forgiven the prison guard is that as a Christian, she understood it was right to forgive. She is already a loving person, so she should continue to be. Corrie should follow her example she set for the people she preached to. 1 John 2:6 Christ says to be imitators of him, and Corrie would be doing so if she pardoned the prison guard of his
In the article "A Jail Sentence Ends. But the Stigma Doesn't." , James Forman argues that in the US there is not enough forgiveness to those who have been incarcerated. Forman brings the debate on the life of an inmate who is released and then trying to get back into the sway of life.
Crawford’s attorney, I do agree that she made some bad decisions in her life. On the other hand, while in prison she received her college degree and did some good deeds, she was a model prisoner. I would argue that this case is an injustice in the judicial system. Both Ms. Crawford and Ms. Kennon crimes were similar yet Ms. Kennon only received 48 year sentence, but got paroled after only servicing 14 years and since then received an award for developing a program while she was in prison. Ms. Crawford on the other hand received a 70 year sentence.
It is hard for the average person to support the unconditional release of someone who is not sorry in the slightest for their actions. Lane is trying to show the divide between the two cases in this passage by highlighted how one supposedly is sorry for their actions. Whilst the other still stands firm and refuses to denounce violence that they enacted and the violence that they had
That way, his pleading for forgiveness would be justified and maybe would be right to ask for if his victims were there. There arguments are very persuasive, but next we will look at the Catholic perspective on the
You're are probably saying in your mind, "But he didn't ask for forgiveness. " But we do it anyway. As the bible once said, "Bear with each other and forgive one another, if any of you have grievance against someone. Forgive as the lord forgave you!"
It’s true you won´t deep down always forgive someone because their actions are irreversible or may be unforgivable, but it’s better for there to be an effort of forgiving in order to move on. Or you may argue that people can move on without forgiveness and just not care or hate that person and what they did. Though just as Elie Wiesel noted in his preface, ¨the past lingers in the present.¨ (Wiesel vii) There will always be a part of you that'll hold onto what happened. For example, after the Nazi´s freed the prisoners Elie said not one of them thought of revenge.
This was one of the few little controversies against this book. However, this story does demonstrate the act of forgiveness which the Bible supports as being a key trait in a good person, because Jesus, the most perfect human to ever walk this earth could forgive all of the human race’s past, present, and future sins. If he can do all that, forgiving someone for, in the long run, a little wrong doing, is nothing at
Everyone has heard the saying “nobody is perfect” and it is true we are all humans, we all make mistakes sometimes, but to what extent does someone stop forgiving when they have endured all the hardship a person gives them after they have been forgiven several times. There is a certain point in life when some people do not deserve to be forgiven because every time that person is forgiven, that person takes advantage it because that person knows they will be forgiven. There is one very prominent character in a story who fits the reason of why some people do not deserve forgiveness, especially when they've been given multiple chances to do the right thing. That person is Amir from the book the Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini.
Life imprisonment with no parole will stop Knight from being a further menace to society by eliminating her chance of re-offending. Anything less than this sentence would be seen as an injustice not only to John Price, but to the community as a whole due to the severity of the
Forgive, not because they deserve forgives, but because you deserve peace. It’s not easy to stop blaming someone’s fault, especially for someone who do wrong to us. In the book The Sunflower written by Simon Wiesenthal, a survivor of the Holocaust during World War II, he described his conflict with Karl, a dying Nazi soldier who killed many innocent Jews and begging for forgiveness for his outrageous crime at the end of his life. At the end of this sad and tragic episode, Simon did not response to Karl’s request directly; instead he left us a tough question: “What should you have done?” Based on what Karl had done during World War II and his repentance, each person might have their own point of view about where should we draw the line of forgiveness.
“His plea for forgiveness was addressed to someone who lacked the power to grant it” as Harold S. Kushner responds in (Wiesenthal, 1998, p. 184). Karl can only receive forgiveness from the ones he committed the crime against, but because of his actions they all perished. Abraham Joshua Heschel a Jewish rabbi, one of the responders said, “No one can forgive crimes against other people. According to Jewish traditions, even God himself can only forgive sins committed against Himself, not against man” (Wiesenthal, 1998, p.
“I learned a long time ago that some people would rather die than forgive. It’s a strange truth, but forgiveness is a painful and difficult process. It’s not something that happens overnight. It’s an evolution of the heart.” (Kidd)
I realize forgiveness is different for everyone and I am typically a forgiving person depending on the situation at hand, but in Simon’s position I would not have felt comfortable forgiving this man for his sins that were committed against entirely different people. I also am in no position to be forgiving him when I have the ability to be just as wicked as him. The only one who could have forgave him would’ve been God and the families who suffered at his hand. Personally, I imagine I would have kept my silence as Simon did or would have told the man it is not my place to forgive him and give him that comfort
However, he believed he could not truly be a Christian until he placed his very ungodly past behind him. To do this he pleaded guilty to something that was not even a crime, and received a 1-3 year prison sentence. While the affirmative and negative sides can agree that Colson could have gotten away without a prison sentence they
What Would I do? There are many definitions of forgiveness. The dictionary defines forgiveness as “The disposition or willingness to forgive.” I agree with that, but I believe that forgiveness also lies in the hands of the victim and varies based on the crime.