Furthermore, curfews are set in place for the safety of children in cities, courts, and even the neighborhood. Curfews are for teens, not to torment them. Teenagers are in desperate need of curfews for their own safety, in order to be focused at school , and a lack of responsibility and time management. The idea of placing specific and reasonable curfews upon children under 18 may be undesirable to teenagers but are definitely on the minds of parents and city leaders. A parent 's duty is to make sure their child is safe at all costs and placing curfews on teenagers may be a necessity to enforce the rightful thing.
Should kids under the age of seventeen have a curfew law of 9 pm? No, because there are many activities or situations that teens do which they are not responsible for being out past 9 pm. There are many school related activities that students attend that can go to as late as 10 pm. Yes, most teens stay out and try to be trouble makers, yet a 9 pm curfew is not going to help it's shown that the average teen crime rate has gone up in a few states that have already passed this law. Plus, most teenagers also have jobs and what are they supposed to do if they don't get off work until 10 pm or 11 pm we shouldn't need choose between getting fired because people can't ever work late or take a fine for the curfew.
Teenagers will probably have a higher possibility of going against their parents word. Also, the curfew can possibly give a teenager temptation to break it. To put it another way: when parents tell their kids that they cannot go out after 10.00 p.m., teenagers may take it as a game and most of them, at some point, will challenge their parents restrictions, because it is in every teenager to do the opposite of what people tell them to do. But the important thing about temptation to break curfew is that most of the young adults that sneak out would not do bad things, they just want to see if they get caught. As well as that, maybe they have an important problem to deal with, which means they might have to go out.
Education World says, “as the year goes on, more students are testing the rules by wearing jeans or other banned items.” If teachers aren’t strict about the dress code students can get by without trouble. Who is going to catch everyone breaking the dress code anyways and what are you going to do when you do catch them? Some schools send them home to change but then they are either going to stay home or come back and miss school. Others order a detention but is that really going to keep all students from breaking the dress code? If they love their off the shoulder shirt so much they might just suffer with a detention every time they want to wear it.
It is if they do not have their necks to their ankles covered their brain stops working. You can not judge a book by its cover because what you see on the outside is not what is on the inside. It should not matter what someone wears to school it is about how they perform in school. “Rules are rules, I get it. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that this dress code has nothing to do with clothes.” “It wasn’t about keeping teenagers from wearing whatever they wanted to defy authority or to fit in.
In cases of emergency, teenagers would remain at home through their own choice (“Teen Curfews Should…”). If there was a danger such as a criminal or natural threat, they would instinctively remain inside. Furthermore, under 15% of people taken in by police are caught committing a crime during curfew hours. Criminal activity is at its highest at 3 and 6 p.m. prior to when curfews are enacted (Budd). Curfews would then only eliminate some if any crimes at
Parents controlling every aspect of teens’ lives are affecting teens in a negative way. Our parents raise us to be successful people; therefore, they can get carried away sometimes. I do believe that parents should control us, for we are living with them in their house. It is their job at the end of the day. They most definitely should be able to tell us where not to go, keep us from befriending the wrong people, do our chores and homework, et cetera.
These restrictions prevent the teenagers from driving without an adult 21 or older, and with more than one passenger other than family in the car. Also, placing time restrictions on them prevents them from driving late at night when they would be very tired. Restrictions on teen driving has made it safer for everyone on the
Most schools would suspend both students right away. What if one student in the fight had a good home life, his parents punished him, and he never got suspended again, but maybe the other student’s parents did not care, he would just simply get some time off of school, and continue to act out. If all students were talked to about what they did wrong and punished inside of school, there may be a chance to drop the percentage of kids that get in trouble. Yes, it may not be the school’s responsibility to punish the kid, but if they do not and neither do the parents, then who will? Giving out school suspensions may give the student that needs to be punished the most, time off from school, which is what they would prefer.
Parents could get out of control with discipline like taking away their phones , computers ,video games , t.v., etc. until they act right. When teens get older they will be defiant / ignorant towards their parents. as soon as the teen gets into trouble they will