Introduction: Copyright and Protection
Intellectual property protections such as Patents, Copyrights, Designs, Trademarks etc. are the jurisprudences that have been developed over a long period of time. The main aim and objective behind these jurisprudences to develop was to offer protection to the different types of intellectual properties. Copyright is the right given to creators and authors to protect their literary, artistic, cinematographic works etc. Patents are supposed to protect the inventions and so on. It is a general thinking that one protection form should not cross the other’s line.If we specifically talk about Copyright, what copyright protects in India is given in the Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957 which states that:
“13. Works in which copyright subsists.- (1) Subject to
…show more content…
Filtration
3. Comparison
AFC test was laid down in the Computer Associates Int. Inc. v. Altai Inc. In this, the computer program code is abstracted, then non copyrightable work is filtered out i.e. mainly the ideas that can not be copyrighted and finally the copyrightable material is compared to check whether the code is copied or not.
Idea Expression Dichotomy: A Myth
However simple this dichotomy may appear, the courts face a rough time separating these two as once any work comes in the front, it is very hard to decide whether it is idea or expression. As to represent any idea also, expressions are needed. If Newton has written his idea in the detailed form in the form of book, his book will have copyright protection. Similarly, ideas without much expressions may come in the form of non protectable entitites. Thus the ideas and expressions can be classified into four types:
1. Distinction between Subject Matter and Protectable expressions in the work
2. Distinction between Unprotectable and Protectable Expressions
3. Distinction between Subject Matter and Unprotectable expressions in the work
4. Earlier ideas that were disembodied and present embodiment of
Lawrence Lessig’s research on piracy and copyright laws suggest the issue began long before Napster’s free website of burning music for personal use. In fact, stolen content was first documented one hundred years ago when Thomas Edison’s inventions were stolen before copyright laws were in place. Moreover, Lessig compares piracy and loopholes throughout history. Thomas Edison’s phonographs and Henri Fourneaux’s player pianos (used to record music) forced copyright laws just as cable companies’ piracy techniques forced copyright laws.
The Constitution allows the government to “take” private property if it is needed in order to complete certain types of public projects. They do so through formal condemnation proceedings. Projects that can result in this type of action are widening of public roads/freeways, the building of public transportation systems, etc. This “right to take” is established by the 5th Amendment and Article 1, Section 19 of the California Constitution. The official term for this type of action on the part of a government agency is eminent domain.
Computer Science students are constantly getting into trouble for lifting entire blocks of code from the Internet. Yesterday, the New York Times published a fascinating piece about academic dishonesty in the computer sience field, which it says is rampant. Here’s some eye-catching figures.
So, by having this in mind, people can tell that their ideas are not original because there was something that sparked their ability to
Conclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.
Copyright is an intellectual property right which is legally enforceable. According to the concept in the Copyright Act, a copyrighted work prevents stealing and infringing of a person’s original creations. These are the following works that can be copyrighted under the Copyright Act; - Dramatic works (scripts,
Non plagiarized Essays are written at the college, high school and the university levels of education. Essays can be descriptive, argumentative or they can be classified according to the subject they relate to. For example, history essays, philosophy essays, theology essays, Medical essays etc. one common thing about all these academic essays is that they have to be non plagiarized essays so that they are recognized as having met the required academic standards of writing. Writing non plagiarized essays for academic purposes is very important.
In fact, this shows us and can persuade us that Copyright limited her creativity, and that it can take away the rights of creativity. If I were to change this example, I would make the author’s argument more clearly. For example, does he for sure think that Copyright takes away creativity? Or is he just bringing the laws to our awareness?
TRADE SECRETS A trade secret is the legal term for confidential business information. It can include any information that is valuable to its owner and that the latter wants to keep secret. Trade secret may include customer lists, recipes and formulas, special processes, devices, methods, techniques, business plans, research and development information, etc. In general, protection is sought to safeguard a trade secret from exploitation by those who obtain access through improper means or who breach an obligation of confidentiality.
Hume (1738) aptly challenged Descartes in claiming that it is impossible to conceive of a disembodied mind. He argues that for an idea to be legitimate it must be traceable back to sense impressions that have been acquired through experience (The Copy Principle). However, it is not possible to gain an impression of the mind, so it is not possible to have a legitimate idea of the self. We cannot gain an impression from our outer senses, since the mind is non-physical; or through introspection, since I can only introspect a given impression, not the thing that possesses it. While I am introspectively aware of e.g. feelings of anger, I am never aware of the self (the mind, the thinking thing) that contains the anger.
Throughout the last year, I 've been seeing more and more posts warning artists about art thieves and stolen art. As the age of modern technology comes upon us, modern art forgery appears in the form of digital art theft. As a non-physical product, digital art is incredibly easy to duplicate, steal and sell. Nowadays, artists display their work on social media sites such as Instagram and Amino, using these platforms to create a public portfolio and sell designs. The use of social media makes art more accessible than ever, for both viewers and thieves.
INTERNET PRIVACY When we say Internet maybe in our mind it’s about our social media right? But what does it mean when we say Internet Privacy? Internet Privacy, it involves the right or mandate of personal “Privacy” concerning the storing, repurposing, provision to third parties, and displaying of information pertaining to oneself via of the “Internet”. It is also a subset of “Data Privacy”. Privacy concerns have been articulated from the beginnings of large scale computer sharing.
An idea is salvation by imagination. -- Frank Lloyd Wright INTRODUCTION Creativity is defined as seeing what everyone else has seen, and thinking what no one else has thought. Creativity is the process of producing something that is both original and worthwhile and characterized by originality and expressiveness and imaginative.
I am unsure of where and how these ideas developed and did not even fully realize that they were
Consequently, the owner has limited legal powers towards the third party. Only in a situation where the third party knew or should have known that the contract in question is violated, the inventor may have remedies towards the third person, but this is merely an exception than a general rule. Efficient trade secret laws could actually lead to greater knowledge diffusion. The optimal law protecting trade secrets, should result in the allocation of the information to more people, which could lead to more innovation and an increase in human capital, by minimizing the risk of distribution to competitors.