Detection of Fraud in External Audit
Introduction:
Financial statement users such as investors, regulators and other stakeholders expect external auditors to detect frauds in financial reports of organizations. There are various auditing standards and guidelines issued by various regulatory authorities in order to outline responsibilities of an auditor in detecting frauds. Still, we had corporate downfall of companies like Enron(2001) who was awarded by Fortune Magazine as “America’s Most Innovative Company” for six years in a row and others such as WorldCom (2002), Tyco (2002) et cetera. So, questions and allegations started flowing on reliability of the audit reports issued by auditors and the auditor themselves. Then congress passed Sarbanes-Oxley
…show more content…
What is the motive behind fraud? The fraud triangle recognized by Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), explains the factors that cause someone to commit occupational fraud. It consists of three components which, together, lead to fraudulent behavior:
1. Perceived financial need (Pressure).
2. Perceived opportunity.
3. Rationalization. This triangle is a result of hypothesis given by Donald Cressey.1
Now let’s see every limb of the triangle as per their order.
1) Pressure: This is said to be the initiator of crime in the first place. This is often said to arise out of need of person who wants to satisfy his needs but cannot do so by legitimate means.
2) Opportunity: The second limb of this triangle points out the methods and means of frauds. This lines out the possibilities and loopholes in the system.
3) Rationalization: Third limb is the reason why most of the fraudster think that whatever they are doing is justified. And that is majority number of fraudster don’t think themselves as
…show more content…
The Center for Audit Quality (CAQ), the trade group for audit firms, issued a brochure on public-company accounting, for clarification as to how auditors function with a particular audit. In which it stated that, auditors consider potential areas of misconduct for a particular company, while deciding the areas of a business to be reviewed. However, the CAQ also clarified that, “because auditors do not examine every transaction and event, there is no guarantee that all material misstatements, whether caused by error or fraud, will be detected.”
Also, PCAOB is trying to come up with a solution to establish financial-reporting fraud center for collecting information on preventing and detecting fraud. This will not only help the auditors to convey their role to investors but will also help investors in obtaining assurance on auditors work. 2 CFO.com Sarah Johnson “What Is the Auditor’s Role in Finding Fraud?” April
Accounting and auditing firm The scandal's consequences would primarily be a professional embarrassment for auditing and accounting firms. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants quickly altered the auditing standards of the accounting profession in the United States, prompting auditors to become more proactive in combating fraud. The shareholders
Criminal and conflict gang whose primarily intent of crimes for tangible gains. Social structure theorists consider that the main components to illegal behavior are the ascendancy of social and economic influences that are distinguished in rundown communities where the population is predominantly lower-class citizens (Siegel, 2010). This following theory goes into helping us comprehend ways the human behavior, is the result of physical
In this paper I will be analyzing the research on Mickey Monus and his fraud crimes. I will exam the fraud and how it applies to this course, such as where it belongs on the fraud tree. Along with what type of fraud was committed, and how they got away with it for so long. Mickey Monus, the former president of the most successful multi-billion-dollar discount drug chain in American history, is from a town in Ohio called Youngstown.
The financial scandals in early 2000s caused the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to be created. Enron, WorldCom and the accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, to intentionally mislead their shareholders by exaggerating their profits and understating their expenses. The scandals had raised the importance of internal control for enhancing corporate governance. Therefore, the government established the SOX to protect the interest of the investors and employees and to monitor the companies and auditors.
Introduction Jennifer Ebarhardt who, through her collaboration with different experts in various fields such as law, criminology, novel studies that further law enforcements and judges as well as criminology discover in her studies found out that there is racial bias in today’s policing and sentencing of criminals such that black color is stereotype as group of people who are associated with violence and therefore they mostly received death sentence especially when their victims are whites and therefore they are blacks who are arrested. These behaviors can be best explains using the following theories: General Strain Theory According to this theory, people are involved in crimes because they are not in a position to achieve their goals making them to be frustrated and has the following sources: A person aspiring to become wealth and famous but these aspirations are impossible making them to engage in vandalism or physical attacks which are antisocial forms of behaviors, a person may experience strains due to removal of highly valued stimuli such as migration to new residence will make him/her to get involved in criminal activities in efforts to revenge the loss of highly valued stimuli. Black American youths are unable to meet making them to develop frustration and delinquency.
Just like bank robbers, there is a rational choice to do it. The crimes are from a rational choice. These are made through taking advantage of a criminal opportunity. Similar to how committing a bank robbery, the criminal must have a plan on how to do the crime without getting caught. This must be done as fast as possible without any police chasing after them.
Deception can be used as a noble shield to protect someone from a hideous truth that can be to their undoing, or it can be a means of intentionally destroying someone; destroying their happiness, their trust, and their peace with the vile vice that is deception. How can the motive for the deception be determined? A straightforward answer is rarely available, and it must be something that the reader decides for him or herself. By examining specific evidence, a conclusion can be drawn about one’s character. Jane Eyre is the subject here.
In this view, there are many different moralities, which compete to become law. In several ways, this theory seems to match strain theory better than the consensus theory. As discussed previously, strain theory suggests that when goals become impossible to achieve through accepted means (defined by laws) crime is likely to occur. But why do these means fall short? It could simply be a natural consequence of society, or it could be a result of lawmakers, who are generally rich and powerful, seeking to protect their wealth by limiting the upward mobility of the economically disadvantaged.
According to the writer, the theory that best explains crime and delinquency is, Robert Agnew's General Strain Theory. The purpose
The fraud triangle is made up by three distinguished elements. These elements in the fraud triangle consist of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. The overall representation of the fraud triangle can be seen as the specific model to spot any type of high-risk unethical and fraudulent performances being conducted by a company, in this case Cendant Corporation. Cedant Corporations actions can be analyzed by the fraud triangle by the way that their senior management/top management decisions fell into the three categories of pressure, rationalization, and opportunity. Cendant Corporation had the pressure to comply with their shareholders and to maintain a stable financial status to prove that they were a profitable organization with a bright company image.
It does not consider other factors such as criminal associations, individual traits, and inner strains, which plays a significant role in determining punishment for the individuals in committing crimes. It is observed that this theory endeavours to know that whether the activities of crime as well as the victim’s choice, criminals commit the activities on start from rational decisions. The theory also determines that criminals consider different elements before committing crime. They engage in the exchange of ideas before reaching on any final decision. These elements consist of consequences of their crimes, which include revealing their families to problems or death, chances of being arrested, and others elements, which comprises of placement of surveillance systems (Walsh & Hemmens, 2010; Lichbach,
Strain theory is a crime theory that was developed by Robert Merton, an American sociologist. According to Robert, strain can be defined as the discrepancies that result from the goals that are culturally defined in reference to the means that are institutionalized and available to meet the set goals. As proposed by Merton, there exists a typological deviance that is based on two criteria; an individual’s belief in how the goals should be attained and an individual’s adherence or motivation to cultural goals. According to the theory, certain stressors or strains are responsible in increasing the likelihood of crime activities around the world.
There are numerous theories that have evolved over time to explain why crimes are committed. These theories include anomie, strained, social control, and rational choice theory. In this research paper I will be focusing on rational choice theory. Majority of these theories focus on a macro-level, which is the largest, meanwhile some focus on a micro-level, the smaller level, depending on the circumstances. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize how rational choice theory is integrate with different crimes.
5 Businesses or organizations throughout the world exhibit their own audit controls as well as observe specific procedures. When addressing IT audit issues, a business such as Asplundh Tree Expert, Inc. are known for their efficient audit procedures and internal practices. IT audit process effectiveness happens when an organization or business is adhereing or responding to set procedures. An organization may conduct several diverse audits, but consequently regardless of the audit type used, an audit is done to ensure a business or organization are using all resources available to them and for their benefit. Diverse IT audit selection ensures that the company set and meet goals and objectives that have been laid down by the international standards
There are many phenomena that could cause or correlate with crime. In addition to this, there are many characteristics to these phenomena that cause/correlate with criminal behavior. Furthermore, these characteristics can be individual, sociological, or both that could have an effect on criminal behavior. This paper will take the educational avenue on crime.