Name: Fernando Ulloa
E-mail Address: fer.ulloa@live.com
EDSP 501
Fall 2015
Final Exam
Imbedded in IDEA and IDEIA are six major principles, three of which are FAPE, non-discriminatory assessment, and zero reject. Discuss the key points of each of these three principles, including an example of how schools must act to assure students are guaranteed each one. For each principle, discuss of at least one pivotal court case that contributed to its development. (That’s one for FAPE, one for non-discriminatory assessment and one for zero reject.)
There are six major principles imbedded in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), three of which are Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE), non-discriminatory assessment, and zero
…show more content…
It calls for assessments to be fair and not culturally or linguistically biased. Larry P. v. Wilson Riles (1979) was heard in the United States District Court, and was a pivotal case in outlining non-discriminatory assessment. Larry P. was a low performing student that attended a school from the San Francisco Unified School District. He was assessed by a school psychologist using the Stanford Binet Intelligence Test and it was found that Larry P. had mild mental retardation and was placed in an Educable Mentally Retarted (EMR) class. Many African-American and Latino students were disproportionately being placed in EMR classes. This caused for a class action lawsuit by five African-American children against San Francisco Unified School District, the State Superintendent Wilson Riles, and members of both the state’s and city’s board of education. The plaintiffs challenged the use of certain assessments to place students into EMR classes. It was found that in-fact IQ test were found to be discriminatory because IQ tests did not eliminate cultural bias. This called for California school districts to stop using IQ tests for placement and identification of African-American children into special education classes. This forced school districts to continue to use multiple assessments and develop culture-fair assessment procedures. School districts could not use only one assessment for all students to assure students their …show more content…
Define designated instructional services, and differentiate between the two federally defined categories of DIS: related services and supplemental aides and services. How does federal law require the schools to determine whether a student needs a related service and any limits placed on them? As part of your answer, cite at least two relevant court cases, how they apply, and describe how the court’s use of a bright-line rule rather than a balancing test to established the need for such services has impacted their availability and the burden the schools must bear in providing
[Title Here, up to 12 Words, on One to Two Lines] The case, Florence County School District IV v. Shannon Carter, is about a student who is entering the 9th grade and diagnosed with ADHD (attention deficit hyperactive disorder) and Dyslexia. Prior to entering high school Shannon Carter did not have an IEP or a 504 plan. Her parents began the process in high school to help their daughter learn to read, at this time Shannon was diagnosed as she was functionally illiterate. Shannon’s family was upset that the school was doing more to help their daughter be able to perform on grade level. Shannon’s parents began a due process because they felt that the school was not doing enough to assure she was reading on grade level by graduation.
Ruby Lopez EDSE 5309-160 Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Background: Dispositive Facts of the Case Amy Rowley, whom herself and both parents were deaf, was enrolled in a public school in the state of New York for the start of her education. Prior to her first year in public school, kindergarten, her parents met for an IEP development. The IEP provided Rowley with a sign-language interpreter who would be present with her in the classroom. After being in the classroom with the sign-language interpreter, it was reported that the interpreter’s services were not needed by Rowley. For the continuation of her kindergarten
Major Issues Raised and what is the case about The San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) was integrated in 1971 by the federal courts. Nearly 3,000 students with Chinese lineage attended the district’s schools. Of the nearly 3,000 students, approximately 1,800 weren’t proficient in English, or they didn’t receive additional remediation regarding their deficient English language skills. The non-English speaking students filed a class action lawsuit against the SFUSD claiming they weren’t provided with equal educational opportunities. In addition, they claimed they were being denied their Fourteenth Amendment rights.
Why do you believe these actions were discriminatory? The first case file with EECO by Tanya Conde girl friend of Samuel Varriano Maintenance #3 who was fired from Pitt University .The defendent 's in case Robert Godzik, William Franicola supervisor and Pitt University was dismissed . Now Robert Godzik and Pitt University have confidence themselves this isn 't a hostile work environment .With
The school district was still not happy with the decision so they appealed their case to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court said that in the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, a free appropriate public education consists of educational instruction that is planned to meet the unique needs of the child that has a disability, supported by such services as are necessary to permit the child "to benefit" from the instruction. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Amy Rowley (458 U. S. 176). Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/ussupct.rowley.htm Free Appropriate Public Education does not require the
Garrett F. (1999): The student who is paralyzed from the neck down is an intelligent young man whose mental capacity had been unaffected from a motorcycle accident, but needed physical care during school hours. The family requested that the school accept financial responsibilities they have health services provided for him while he was at school the district refuse. Relying on idea and Iowa law Garrett's mother requested administrative law judge hear the case. The administrative law judge determined that IDEA required the district to bare the financial responsibilities for the services or needed throughout the day for the student. The district challenged this decision and the case was brought to the federal district court.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a federal law enacted in 1990 and reauthorized in 1997 and 2004. It is designed to protect the rights of students with disabilities by ensuring that everyone receives a free appropriate public education (FAPE), regardless of ability. Furthermore, IDEA strives not only to grant equal access to students with disabilities, but also to provide additional special education services and procedural safeguards. Special education services are individualized to meet the unique needs of students with disabilities and are provided in the least restrictive environment. Special education may include individual or small group instruction, curriculum or teaching modifications, assistive technology,
This new assessment tool had two major impacts. First, the expectations for individual students were raised by increasing the difficulty of the material on the assessment—no longer were the tests considered minimal skills tests. Passing each of the reading, writing and mathematics components of the grade 10 test, also known as the exit-level exam, was a requirement for receiving a high school diploma in the state. Second, schools were also held to higher standards with the expectation that not only the campus as whole but the specific subpopulations (African-American, Caucasian, Hispanic, and Economically Disadvantaged) had to achieve minimal standards. Passing rates on these standardized exams, along with attendance and drop-out data were used to assign schools accountability ratings with severe repercussions mandated for schools that were placed at the low end of the accountability scale (Texas Education Agency et al.,
(2000 ed. and Supp. IV). His parents, Jeff and Sandee Winkleman, worked together with the school system to develop and write and individualized education plan (IEP). They could not reach an agreement on the IEP and therefore requested a due process hearing per §1415(f)(1)(A) (2000 ed., Supp. IV).
Although the NCLB Act implemented in 2001 has shown great efforts for trying to ensure the equality for all students, it does not successfully provide effective achievement for minorities, underprivileged kids, or students with disabilities across the nation. Implementers of the NCLB Act should create a more personalized version to accommodate children with certain disabilities in addition to the regular version of the act. The NCLB Act that was created in 2001 ensures that regular children capable of learning like the average student get the appropriate service to react to the government’s state academic assessments, but those who require special accommodations although have been successful enough to improve test scores, still are not meeting
Senate Bill 1543 that became effective August of this year works to protect students who did not complete a typical high school program from being treated unfairly when being considered for admission to a university. A student who submits evidence of completing an education following the same standards, specifically including standards on standardized testing scores, than they must be equally considered as a student who did graduate from a public school. In order to determine this student’s would-be rank in a high school class if it is a factor in determining admission, the institution must decide that student’s rank based on the average graduating students rank with similar testing scores on the standardized test
Therefore, the issue pertaining to students with learning disabilities was thrown out in relation to this particular case. • The state Supreme Court, in addressing the ill fitting correlation drawn in Stamos’ citation of Bell v. Lone Oak Independent School District as an explanation of how students have a fundamental right to participate in extracurricular activities, stated that correlations between the fundamental right of marriage and this case could not be aligned. • The state Supreme Court also stated that due to the facts the rule did not infringe upon any fundamental rights nor did it create/burden a suspect class, that it did not violate the equal protection guarantees of the Texas Constitution. • Citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 577-78, 92 S. Ct. 2709
Using this model would allow Mr. Miller to review the mission of the school, determine whether ability grouping is aligned with the mission, and select an alternative that reflects the mission. 3. What action, if any, should Principal Miller take to demonstrate that he is an educational leader who treats people fairly, equitably, and with dignity and respect? Following Standard 3, Principal Miller should involve families and other stakeholders in the decision-making process. Mr. Miller should select and utilize a group decision technique will allow the opinions of the groups of parents, as well as other individuals and groups, to be heard and present their point of
Throughout many of the affirmative action legal cases, one of the main arguments from proponents is that it is necessary in order to right the wrongs of past racial discrimination. Some say that affirmative action is justified because even though white applicants may be more qualified, this is only because they did not face the same hardships as their minority counterparts (Rachels, Ethics, 1973). Many argue if we do not integrate disadvantaged minorities into mainstream social institutions, they will continue to suffer the discrimination that has plagued our country for centuries and that this is detrimental to not only the minorities but also society as a whole (Anderson, 2002, 1270–71). However, the debate has recently shifted to the benefits of diversity in the classroom which the Supreme Court has affirmed as being a positive thing
(Source B). It seems as if this statement is now more relevant than ever. The school system spends so much time and energy grading each student the same way, without stopping to take into account the various types of