ipl-logo

Faction Vs Government

828 Words4 Pages

In this paper talks about the interest of our citizens today. In this essay address a question about faction and the opinions of the roles of government. In this federalist paper is about an issue of “faction” because known as special interest. James Madison think faction can have problems by having different forms of government and how government need to be operated. The definition of faction means lower or majority citizens has interest for the community. James Madison defined faction by “[n]umber of citizens, whether a majority or minority, who were united and activated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” (#10 Madison) …show more content…

The conclusion for pure democracy James Madison wrote “a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction.” (#10 Madison) Madison believed a pure democracy government is for the small number of people living in population that’s is has a small government. If a person did a mistake for something that cannot admit to solved an issue if someone had it. Faction means the liberty of every citizen in America but some cases it might reduce the political rights for having a pure democracy that has a small government. For republic James Madison Wrote” I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.(#10 Madison) Madison believed republic government can give an opportunity to fix issues have been made. Republic can give many promises any individual to have an opportunity to achieved or interest in political life. Also, Republic is a government that can extend of number of citizens because government takes

Show More
Related

  • Studied Criticisms Of James Madison's Federalist 10

    343 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

    Read More

  • Analyzing James Madison's 'Federalist Paper Number 10'

    208 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are also many other reasons a faction may exist, as long as there is a common idea among a group of people there will be a faction. He believes in order to limit factions you must do it in one of two ways; by removing the cause or controlling the effect. Madison explains the only way to remove the cause is to take away liberties or have everyone think the same way, both of which are more dangerous than the faction themselves. Because removing the cause won’t work the only

    Read More

  • Chapter Summary: The Federalist Papers By Alexander Hamilton

    1223 Words  | 5 Pages

    Factions which defined by Madison are groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 Dbq

    243 Words  | 1 Pages

    Perhaps the most famous Federalist paper, Federalist 10, starts off by saying that one of the biggest arguments that favors the Constitution is that it creates a government suited to minimize the harm caused by factions. Faction, in this case, is defined as a group of people whether a minority or majority based on class, race, and profession that all share a common interest. It was inevitable that factions would occur and perhaps the defining characteristic was the unequal distribution of property. This would ultimately lead the poor without property to become the majority in a “tyranny of the masses.” Madison believed that there were two solutions in preventing majority factions, 1) Remover the causes, and 2) Control the effects.

    Read More

  • Federalist Paper 10 Study Guide

    218 Words  | 1 Pages

    1. In Federalist Paper 10, Madison expressed concerns about factions and his desire to protect the minority (people with land) from the majority (those without). He stated that a large republic should be created so that tiny factions interest groups will have a difficult time uniting and becoming a majority that usurps the minority. Do you think this theory has withstood the test of time? Discuss instances in which it has/has not.

    Read More

  • 'The Federalist No. 10' By James Madison

    173 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article “The Federalist No. 10” James Madison a faction is a group of citizens made up of people with the same interests and who don’t seem to care about the rights of other citizens. A lot of people weren’t agreeing when it was said that the United States would be too big to govern as a democracy causing there to be a large amount of factions. James Madison was aware there were a variety of factions, he showed that the democratic side using the majority rule would take down the factions resulting in making them come together to work as one, the republican side would allow the factions the necessary space for them to work together and get elected in the office. The minority groups would be protected because it would indicate the factions

    Read More

  • Federalism Dbq

    425 Words  | 2 Pages

    Around this era of the late 1700’s, the citizens of the newly independent nation of “America” were in the process of ratifying their government from the Articles of Confederation to the current Constitution which allowed for a democratic republic. The people in support of this ratification were the “Federalist” whom often used pamphlet writings known as the “Federalist Papers” to persuade and inform the public of their ideas and Constitution ratification. The most influential paper among the 85, is the Federalist paper #10 that disproves the Antifederalists’ argument that a republic of any kind would fall from the pressure of multiple divisive opinions among its citizens. Given the nature of humans by God, creating factions based on similar

    Read More

  • Democrat Pros And Cons

    1109 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Federalist Papers are some of the most important words that have been written in this history of the United States and were written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison who is responsible for Number 10. Madison focuses Number 10 on factions, their causes, and the result of their existence. Madison beings by stating the capability of the Constitution to control the outcome of factions, such as violence or damage and goes on to state the causes of factions and the solutions to their existence. Madison’s main focus in his paper is factions and their outcomes; a faction is simply a group of people with a common interest, either the “majority or minority of the whole.” Factions originate when people divide themselves over

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 James Monroe

    163 Words  | 1 Pages

    As stated in The Federalist No. 10, James Madison explains the arguments occurring between those who possess property of land and those who are not. The unfair distribution of property brings a conflict between classes, explaining a common cause of factions. In fact, the antagonism between the “creditors” and “debtors”, defined by James Madison, was impacted strongly by their opinions. Additionally, their opinion on certain topics such as religion and the Government are naturally influenced by their diversity. Therefore, different perceptions based on their “different degree of activity” plummet high into the category of creating their own distinguished groups of what they favor known as factions.

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 Argument

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    10 in an attempt to ratify the Constitution, the new form of government for the United States. In the Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison analyzed the way to deal with facts, made a comparison between a pure democracy and a republic, and made another comparison on whether a small government or a large government would be the best for America. He informed the people that there is not a way to completely get rid of factions, but there are ways to deal with them. One great way to deal with factions is by having a government that knows how to control and deal with their effects. Madison believes that a republic can do that job better than a democracy, because a democracy is a small society of people who can not admit there is a cure to factions.

    Read More

  • Supreme Courts Dbq

    1112 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thus causing even more conflict, especially amongst those not in the South. Another controversial issue was federalism because Marshall gave the national government a vast amount of power over state 's rights, and Taney believed more in giving power to the state rather than the national government. In addition, this is when outside groups started forming and lobbying their influence over government decisions, whether it is pertaining to slavery, rights, or economic interests. James Madison regarded “factions” or interest groups with concern when authoring segments of the Federalist Papers. The problem he envisioned was that eliminating them from the political scene was a threat to democratic principles, a cure worse than the disease.

    Read More

  • The Role Of Anti-Party Politics In Modern America

    500 Words  | 2 Pages

    Madison, in federalist paper no. 10, said that “The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man,” and concluded that the best way to live with this fact is by restraining these factions. One of the best ways that this is accomplished is through the number of different groups themselves. In a small democracy, the whims of the majority could cause radical and harmful government choices. The organization of a large republic makes it difficult for any group to gain significant influence over the government. Not only this, but the checks and balances of the branches of government and the distance of lawmaking from the majority also slow a majority in government from making rash decisions.

    Read More

  • Factions And Federalist Essay No. 10

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the case of taxation, the more powerful of the two parties would have the opportunity to impose higher taxes on the minority, thus, saving themselves money. Madison firmly believed that the constitution had the ability to solve the problems created by factions. Madison envisioned a large republic that would make it difficult for corrupt candidates to get elected. Madison expressed this by stating, In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters.

    Read More

  • Civil War: The Republican Party

    373 Words  | 2 Pages

    (History.com, Republican Party founding) “In a broad definition a republic is a state is a state or country in which sovereignty is invested in the people. Most commonly such principle beyond the control of the state's citizens is a hereditary principle, and in this sense a republic is the opposite of a

    Read More

  • Madison's Views On Faction Summary

    501 Words  | 3 Pages

    Madison’s essay reflects the fear many had of a tyrannical government and the desire to ensure that the country didn’t revert back to that which it had just escaped from. He notes the necessity to prevent any one faction or group from gaining too much power and oppressing those in the minority. The separation of powers was set in place to ensure that this could not happen. Even if one group decides they want something, the other two have the equal authority to prevent it should it not represent the country as a whole.

    Read More

More about Faction Vs Government

Open Document