People in underdevelopment countries suffer from difficult living conditions. Parents will not be able to help all their children to go to school. It is more important to live than to learn. That is why they will encourage their children to work and help them to find a new income (Fors, 2012). In this case, children will spend more time working less time learning (Sihori, 2014).
For the students, they are uncomfortable in many cases and don’t really help to stop bullying. School uniforms should therefore be removed from schools because it is expensive to get special clothes for school, they can contradict a student’s culture and religious beliefs, and they restrict the students’ abilities to express themselves. Uniforms can be very expensive for many families, especially those with financial difficulties. The first piece of evidence comes from article A paragraph 4 and says, “(Families) spend more money on clothing because (students) need to have different sets for school and out of school.” Uniforms can be very particular and expensive all on their own, but kids need clothes outside of school. Since kids keep growing, new clothes for both needs are constantly bought which can be hard for some people.
If the paying is just for the makeshift, it is wasting money. The money that parents paid could used for their children’s future. (Introduction)(Intro) If students work hard in school, they can earn a reward for future, but if they being paid for grade, they earn reward at school but not in future (Good). Again, paying for grades is makeshift for the class grade and it is not for your long period life. To make students success in the future, paying for grade is not good idea.
Having so many graduates will impact negatively on the job sector. The graduates will hence be competing for the few available jobs which will lead to lower salary and low productivity. Lastly, free college schooling will encourage laziness as the youth will feel that they do not have to apply effort to get a higher education. The federal government, therefore, needs to rethink this strategy and instead work on lowering tuition costs for the underprivileged in the
The researchers believe that when teachers do not think parental involvement can facilitate children’s learning, they will be less motivated to encourage parents to participate. For kindergarten teachers, home-school co-operation will give them additional workload, and along with the lack of resources, it makes home-school co-operation even more difficult. Fresh Fish Traders’ school has been established for thirty-four years yet the campus is small and dilapidated. As mentioned in the case, part of the children at school come from poor families. Without a doubt, the school does not have enough resources.
Yes, our poor are still in a disadvantage with education and crime. For example, the disadvantage on poor or no education at all on other places out of the U.S. Where parents need to pay for education and making education not an option. The biggest possibility that the child’s parents aren’t educated and that will make it even harder for parents to scaffold their child properly. Secondly, the disadvantage of poor security that will bring higher possibilities on crime. Poor families are need in finding of inexpensive areas that they can afford.
Buccat and Cuntapay (2006) defined absenteeism in an educational institution as a perennial problem. According to them, there is a need to gauge the students’ consciousness on absenteeism. Clores (2009) stated that truancy may indicate low performance of teachers, students’ dissatisfaction of the school service, or lack of or poor academic and non- academic structures or policies that address the problems or factors influencing or reinforcing this behaviour. Parents are financially burdened for having their children to stay longer in the school, having to re- enroll them in subjects where they fail due to excessive absences. Missing school is a serious business, and its impact on student achievement and drop-out rates has been vastly underestimated, according to a recent report from Johns Hopkins
They should do that because a lot of stuff kids can afford. School supplies is actually very expensive when its all added up. Some kids family doesn't have a car and they are not able to get it. Then us kids are punished for not getting stuff we have no way of getting. If we are forced to go to school, then we shouldn't have to pay to go there.
They directly affect the economy of the country considering most of them came from the poor sector and may if not all, because of lack of education, also lack the requirements to have a good paying job. Catalan and Durban (2012) stated in their journal the three most common issues about the Philippine education system. The first concern that was discussed is the role of education development. Based on the information some researchers have found, the decline or progress of country’s economy can be directed to its educational system. Digumarthi and Dutt (2004) also believed that education and the economy of a country are closely related to each other.
Not every parent could afford to send their children to a secondary school, especially when they have more than couple kidsThe kenyan education system is unfair because the public primary school does not teach students well compared private primary school, all high school are expensive which leads to most students not attending high school after they finish 8th grade, gender inequality, life expenses are some of the reasons that reflect the low high school graduation rate. The education system in kenya is unfair because most of the parents are not able to send their