An Analysis of the Movie “Fail Safe” In Relation to Confucian Moral Philosophy 1.0 Discussion of the Philosophy In the west, when people think about philosophers, most often, they would recall names such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. In East Asia, on the other hand, when people think about philosophers, they would remember Confucius and Lǎo Zi. Up to now, the teachings of Confucius is still being practiced in China. Imagine, a philosophy over 2000 years old, is still applicable towards the modern lives of the Chinese. Since Confucianism is a rather comprehensive topic, in this paper, we would be briefly discussing some of the fundamental concepts of Confucianism, specifically the moral philosophy of Confucius. When one reads through …show more content…
In the Philippines, one’s behavior is restrained and regulated by laws which has its corresponding penalties when violated. This kind of system does not teach the people on how to become morally good. With the Five Constant Virtues, even without there being laws which penalize an act, a man who has perfected the Five Constant Virtues would not do such an act if he knows that such act is wrong – if it goes against “the way”. 2.0 Analysis of the Movie Now that we finished the brief discussion about Confucianism, let us apply this to the moral issues presented in the movie “Fail Safe”. Not all issues, however, may have a clear answer, since some of the issues presented in the movie may be too modern for Confucianism to recognize. Additionally, some of these answers are debatable since some authors has a different interpretation towards some of the key concepts of Confucianism. For this paper, we would limit the analysis to only four moral issues. The 1st issue would be regarding the American President allowing the Russian Government to shoot down the US planes. The 2nd issue would be regarding Colonel Grady continued the supposed attack order regardless of what the military did to convince him. The 3rd issue would be regarding the American President commanding to bombing of New York, regardless of the presence of his wife in that
The main sources that the author relies on are the merchant manuals, for they were likeminded and resembled Confucius philosophy. The author uses these manuals, which “were imbued to some extent with the desire to teach Confucian morality,” to support his main argument. The foremost purpose of these merchant manuals in late imperial China was “to help people achieve success and attain wealth through commerce.”
Fifty-three years, ten months and eighteen days ago, Eisenhower gave what is now known as one of the most memorable farewell addresses in presidential history, excluding George Washington and his departing speech, to the nation. In this amazing address, Eisenhower expresses fears and warns of deficit spending, the corrupting influence of the military, and the possible corruption of science. In quick overview, this speech seems like a simple farewell to the nation he had served for so many years, but if you dive a little deeper, the meaning is much more multifaceted. After briefly thanking Congress, Ike then delves into the problems he foresees, identifying two main points and sub-points.
Confucianism enforced harmony, between people while legalism enforced strict following of rules. For confucianism was built on the belief that harmony results when people in society accepted their place in their lives. However, Legalism was built on the fact that all humans are more inclined to do the wrong thing instead of the right thing due to the motivation of self-interest. Confucianism is described through the five key relationships: father to son, elder brother to younger brother, husband to wife, elder friend to younger friend, and ruler to subject. But legalism was described
How would you feel about your government secretly breaking into your house and spying on everything you do just because you don't align with everything that they believe that is what happened with Watergate and it did not only force Richard Nixon to resign so he wouldn't be impeached. Watergate also changed the way government worked, New rules for how government works, Changed people's view against government, less people wanted to work in politics. One way Watergate changed the way government worked. With new rules for how government works to make sure another watergate does not happen in the future. For example congress created a permanent intelligence oversight committees in both the senate and the house this helps prevent the senate and
Zhu Xi is a Chinese neo-Confucian philosopher, that believed that our moral mirror reflected our morality. The clean moral mirror reflects the underlying moral pattern. Xi believed that all things were brought together into unification by two universal aspects of reality: qi and li. Li is the principle of essence for our morality. The cause of immoral action is due to qi because qi obscures our perfect moral mirror.
R. Reid wrote Confucius Lives Next Door to illustrate how the teachings of the ancient philosopher and political activist, known in the west as Confucius, have influenced East Asian cultures as they have risen in economic power, how Confucian ethos are expressed in contemporary Japanese’s culture and how Confucius’s teachings revolve around loyalty between individuals and the groups they belong to. Those groups include one’s family, his neighbors, the company he works for or the school he attends, and any other group of people he associates with. Being a responsible member of a group is central to East Asian culture versus the Western, particularly American, focus on individuality. Reid’s book provides both anecdotal and empirical evidence on the cultural results of this group focused philosophy on
Their rationalities are still being used today. They were incredible masterminds with awesome impact in the antiquated society. Confucianism imparts to Aristotle mindfulness that for people to be great, they require moral astuteness and in addition different demeanors of character, yet Confucianism places more prominent accentuation on the part of reflection and concentrate in the improvement of good insight (Provis, 2017). Over the next several paragraphs, it is my goal to address the following: 1)
Confucius, Aristotle, and Lao-Tzu—all incredibly influential thinkers—did not always agree on how one ought to live; where Aristotle believed that thought or study led to virtue, Lao-Tzu placed focus on inaction, and Confucius taught that rituals paved the way to the best life. A few ideas, however, tie Confucius closer to Aristotle than to Lao-Tzu. Because Aristotle also placed importance on names, emphasized the need to find a mean of behavior, and believed that rulers should most critically be moral, Confucius would have preferred Aristotle to Lao-Tzu. Names—Aristotle utilizes them, even though he recognizes the difference between what exists in reality and the form represented by its name, while Lao-Tzu, on the other hand, maintains that names only serve to put limits on the named, and, in fact run the risk of creating opposites. According to Lao-Tzu, “Recognize beauty and ugliness is born.
t Comparing the Dao in Confucianism to the Dao in Daoism, similarities or differences Dao in Confucianism represents the entire normative human order. The Dao in Daoism antedates Tian and acts as the basis of the natural order. While in Confucian Dao they hold the ideal political-social-ethical order ordained by tian for the people. Confucianism encourages their perfectibility through self-effort the teaching of ethics and good movement. The primacy of the Confucian Dao requires superior human beings, sages and men of virtue to exert their highest effort to actualized its ideal design.
Humans can do what is morally good by following the guidance of the four seeds (Kim.M, 2008) The reason behind these four seeds, is Mengzi’s importance placed on feelings and emotions and how they motivate us to care for others. And by caring for immediate family first is how we can extend to caring for everyone. ‘Serving parents’ is the primary meaning for humaneness, and ‘Respecting elders’, and not just family, is the primary meaning of rightness (Chen. L, 2015).
Its discourse rests on morality and the belief that human beings are intrinsically good and that, through further improvement, they can achieve unity and sustain their relationship with the Heaven. Reality, according to Confucianism, is a network of interactions in which everything in the universe is connected. Its focus lies primarily on human interrelationships and is therefore less concerned with the existence of gods or retribution and more with family and other human aspects of ordinary life, such as hierarchy – a pillar of Asian society. It imposes blind respect for one’s parents, elders and ancestors and can be counterposed with the modern tendency of shattering the nuclear family, as in e.g. Dark Water.
There are two giants in the Axial Age of human history, Confucius and Plato, who are considered as the landmark in the oriental and western world. They are great philosophers, ideologists as well as excellent educators, whose thought have profound influence to the oriental and western world. Confucius’s ideas maintain authority for more than two thousand years, which have intimate connections with development of Chinese federal society. Even to this day, it still remains practical significance and reflects the glorious radiant. Plato’s doctrine is a source of Western political thought.
Not only did Confucianism emphasize filial piety, humaneness and ritual, it also encouraged men to become morally proper or junzi. Oxman describes these morally proper men as Confucius’s answer to the turmoil of the current period. To Confucius the junzi, could lead others through their example. However, according to Pines, the meaning of junzi had morphed through the passage of time.
1. What philosopher taught who? a. Plato b. Alexander the Great c. Socrates d. Aristotle 2. Metaphysics can be divided into what two categories?
It could also serve as a challenge to understand oneself better and to set conditions of new initiation of dialogue. At the heart of Watsuji´s ethics, I assume, there is a possible path to follow, which resides in a resolute implementation of Watsuji´s ethical outlook. The resolute implementation here is not an imperative, it is but an equal manifestation of both individuality and sociality, a middle path between the liberal and the communitarian attitude, between the individualism and the totalitarianism. Such a middle path might be reached by means of newly established trust in purely human qualities such as benevolence, trustworthiness, truthfullness and sincerity. In other words, there ought to be kokoro in betweenness and this kokoro should display the humanity and reflect the humanity of others (Couteau, 2006,