The International English Language Testing System (IELTS) is proved to be a fairness test that measures the language proficiency of people who want to study or work in environments where English is used as a language of communication (IELTS Guide, 2013). IELTS has taken on a position of dominance as the most commonly graduation exit requirement exam for non-native speakers of English who wishes to study in an English-medium setting over the past two decades in tertiary institutions around the world. (IELTS, 2013). A formal examination is one of the methods of evaluating students' ability widely used in most educational systems. Some people are of the opinion that how well a student does in an examination is a clear reflection of his or her …show more content…
Under the new 3-3-4 academic structure, most students of full-time undergraduates programmes admitted from September 2012 are required to attain a minimum overall band of 6.0 or 7.0 in IELTS. (HKIEd Equips Future Educators, 2012). IELTS is the test that sets the standard and it is a standardized worldwide test with strong recognition and reputation. Some people would argue that there is alternative testing system that is able to test students’ English proficiency such as Test of English as foreign language (TOFEL). Nevertheless, IELTS is a global standard test and the result standards are strictly maintained all over the world. (IELTS Guide, 2013).The IELTS nine band score system grades scores consistently. The IELTS test serves as a perfect medium to evaluate students’ language benchmark and gives the applicants a polished employment chances. The IELTS score is required to get admission into many renowned universities across the world and applicants are demanded by a majority of immigration destination to take IELTS test in order to qualify for the eligibility criteria. Therefore, IELTS should be set as one of the graduation exit requirements for higher education students in …show more content…
IELTS is a widespread test that is recognized by a number of countries as the test gives someone an approval to study in the English speaking countries once they passed the test. Yet, some candidates may think it is quite time consuming to practice lots of sample papers. Although the amount of time that the candidates are going to spend on practicing well for IELTS seems long, it is worth taking the test as it attains certain level of proficiency in using English which will widely recognized by organizations. Research states that IELTS motivates test takers to develop real and well-rounded English rather than learning by rote. (Dooey et al., 2002). It indicates that students’ understanding of English is improved and valid for real life in an English speaking country. Hence, IELTS is one of the most reliable indicators to reflect a graduate’s English proficiency upon
Both “Affirmative Action for Dummies” by Tim Wise and “Affirmative Action: Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education” made me think about how over the years, affirmative action has evolved from the civil war era to the twentieth century to now. I agree how Tim Wise uses the difference between institutional racism and affirmative action to explain his view on the subject. He describes affirmative action and discrimination as two separate concepts, one based on a larger social structure and the other based on color and race. I also agree with the fact that both terms have historical impacted history in two separate ways. Historical events such as Plessy vs Ferguson case and the addition of the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments challenged many
able to recognise and challenge it. Practitioners and children and young people’s organisations generally aim to be inclusive and welcoming to all children and families who wish to use their services, despite this, overt discrimination does sometimes occur, this can be the result of, Individual staff members favouring some children and families or treating others in a less favourable way because of prejudices that they hold
Test of English as a Foreign Language) as applicable, Certifications
Race can be an important fact when selecting a jury. It’s important to have a jury of different racial, ethnic, gender or religious believes to helps limit racial discrimination. If at any time the prosecutor or the defended feel discriminated by the jury, their attorney can challenge the jury by using the peremptory challenges in Which he or she has The right to challenge a potential juror without disclosing the reason for the challenge.
RESEARCH PAPER Affirmative action is a set of governmental policies which tend to give privileges to minorities who suffered from discrimination in the past by providing them with access to educational and employment opportunities. First nuanced by Franklin Roosevelt with war-related work, Affirmative action only became an executive order (10925) in 1961 under John F. Kennedy to ensure that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed, color or national origin, to which was later on added sex by Lyndon Johnson in 1965 (11246). From that day till now affirmative action has been a controversial issue in America, with some who find it fair and some other who consider it as a reverse discrimination.
Introduction A frantic student gazes up at the clock, noting the nondescript posters covering almost every inch of the bulletin board. With five minutes to spare, the student hurriedly flips over the testing packet to the first page and begins checking over her work a second time. When time is called, the student sighs in relief, knowing that she has finished her last standardized test and is done with testing for the year. Or is she?
There are many concepts that underpin discrimination and many theories to draw from this paper will detail and explore the definitions, concepts, and theories such as Stereotyping, Social Identity Theory, and Conflict Theory which are all to the fore in prejudice and discrimination. It will seek to examine current research and suggest strategies based on best practice and evidence to combat discrimination and prejudice within organisations to allow for a healthy productive workforce. Prejudice is an unjustified or incorrect negative attitude in the direction of an individual based exclusively on the individual’s affiliation with a social group, a prejudiced person might not act on their attitude.
There are several ethical dilemmas presented in this case. The first is that of racial discrimination, or more specifically, reverse discrimination. Reverse discrimination is the unfair treatment of a dominant or majority group which results from policies established to correct discrimination of a minority group. If a person is not allowed to have the same privileges or rights as another because of his race, it is considered inequitable. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the basis for all discrimination issues as it outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion and national origin.
tandardized Tests Should NOT Be Mandatory Thousands of teenagers per year are turned away from the college of their dreams because their SAT scores were not high enough. A lot of students’ plans are ruined because they didn’t score well on one of the mandatory standardized tests. In high school, students can be forced to repeat the grade if they don’t score high enough on standardized tests. After high school, they can be denied by colleges because they didn’t score well enough on these tests. Standardized tests are an unreliable way to measure a student’s intelligence level.
Disparities and Discrimination in US Criminal Justice System The US justice system is marred with instances of high degree discrimination and disparities and these stems from unprecedented poor management of the civil law in the country. Judging by the nature of historical injustices that have defined the criminal justice system, it goes without mentioning that, the confusion’s genesis is in the law itself and racial incarceration of the minority colored groups by the majority whites. Definition of the two terms is based on differences but the deviations are based on either legal terms or social, economic and political basis for the other. The degree of difference is highly unrecognizable but then it is clear that where disparity exists discrimination
By using humor and impartial words, she does not alienate either of her audiences. In addition to her language, Alonso’s argument does not attempt to claim that all aspects of examinations are not without flaws. She also does not dismiss any frustrations that come with examinations; rather, Alonso asks that students and teachers connect examinations to a larger meaning. Alonso wants students and teachers to understand that examinations are a learning process for both students and teachers: a gauge of a student’s academic performance and a gauge of how well a professor taught a topic. Her positive outlooks on examinations often persuade the audience to overlook the negatives.
Imagine walking into school on test day. You’ve spent the whole school year preparing for this exam; one exam that will determine whether or not you can move forward with your life. The stakes are high, and the stress is even higher. The closer the time gets to the beginning of the test, the heavier your chest becomes. You find yourself gasping for air, as though you can’t get any oxygen into your lungs; you’re drowning.
Increasingly today in America’s school system, there is a recognition of tension between individuality and conformity. The struggle between students’ personal needs and the needs of the whole continues to grow. This can be seen though the controversial issue of standardized testing. These are tests that are designed in a way, which are administered and recorded in a consistent method. In standardized testing, all test takers are required to answer the same set of multiple-choice, true or false questions, short answer, and essay questions.
Before the founding of our nation, we were all considered human, all an individual, all connected, until affluence classified us, politics separated us, and the color of our skin spoke for us. This issue of racism, our skin color “speaking for us”, created political problems—one of them embodying voting discrimination among African Americans. To respond to voting discrimination, African Americans utilized demonstrations to rebel. In the Selma to Montgomery March of 1965, over 500 African Americans marched to demand voting rights.
When addressing the difference between just and unjust laws for the clergymen Martin Luther King Jr. stated, A just law is man-made code that squares with the mora law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law.