ipl-logo

Fallacy Literature Review

1659 Words7 Pages

LITERATURE REVIEW:

INTRODUCTION:
A fallacy is, very generally, an error in reasoning. This differs from a factual error, which is simply being wrong about the facts. To be more specific, a fallacy is an "argument" in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support.
(Michael Labossiere)
The word "fallacy" is not an accurate term. One reason is that it is questionable. It can mention either to
(a) a sort of an error in argument,
(b) a sort of error in thinking
(c) a false opinion
(d) the reason for any of the past mistakes including what are typically referred to as "explanatory strategies."
HISTORY
Aristotle was both the main formal and informal logician, inventorying sorts of off base thinking, in particular, named fallacies. He was both the first to name sorts of logical erros, and the first to gathering them into classes. The outcome is his book On Sophistical Refutations.
Be that as it may, Aristotle 's educator, Plato, merits credit for being the main philosopher to gather cases of terrible reasoning, which is an essential preparatory bit of field work before naming and classifying. Plato 's "Euthydemus" protect the contributing fallacious arguments in frame work, putting the maybe misrepresented cases into the mouths of two sophists, that is, migratory educators of talk. Thus, deceptive contentions are now and then called "sophisms" and awful thinking "sophistry". Aristotle alludes to a couple of these cases as

Show More
Related

  • Gop Rhetorical Analysis

    54 Words  | 1 Pages

    During a GOP debate Republican Senator,Ted Cruz, attempted to use a diversionary tactic of answering a question,with a question, in order to draw attention from the real issue. In the media this sort of behavior is considered a red herring fallacy which attempts to hide weakness in a argument by not addressing the issue.

    Read More

  • Hillary Clinton Fallacy Analysis

    460 Words  | 2 Pages

    Think about all seven billion people in the world today and what do we have in common? No matter who the person is, they will make mistakes throughout their life. Yes, even future presidents make them too. Certain candidates are known for repeatedly being caught using logical fallacies. During the Democratic Debate, Hillary Clinton used two kinds of fallacies.

    Read More

  • Montag's Meme Analysis

    584 Words  | 3 Pages

    My meme is a red herring fallacy because an argument is brought up but the other side is is arguing about something entirely different. Montag states that books can be the foundation of a better society but the actual society is arguing something different. They are arguing that television is already the foundation to a great society. Notice how society didn't bring up books, they are switching the topic to television and not books. This is also a logos mode of persuasion.

    Read More

  • Logical Fallacy Corrupts Arguments

    105 Words  | 1 Pages

    Logical fallacies aren't the easiest to recognize if you don't understand what they are. A logical fallacy defects and weakens arguments. It creates flaws in the logic of an argument and makes it invalid. There are many different kinds of fallacies and they can be found almost anywhere someone can look. I saw this hasty generalization talking about celebrities and it seemed biased.

    Read More

  • Socrates And Euthyphro Argument

    1310 Words  | 6 Pages

    For the individuals who are searching for a tasteful meaning of devotion, the discourse is a failure, for no conclusion has been come to concerning the exact idea of that goodness. It has now and again been kept up that the genuine motivation behind logic isn't to answer addresses yet rather scrutinize the appropriate responses that have been given. Anyways, this is precisely what Socrates has been doing in this back and forth. Euthyphro has displayed a few speedy and prepared responses to the inquiry "What is devotion?" however upon magnification, each of these questions has appeared to be unsuitable.

    Read More

  • The Straw Man Fallacy: The Use Of Fallacy In Writing Reasons

    831 Words  | 4 Pages

    A fallacy is the use of poor, or invalid, reasoning for the construction of an argument. In other words, it is an argument that makes an error in logic or assumptions that should not have been made. In the formal setting, an argument is two sides presenting their sides argument using logic and deductive reasoning. In the book “Writing Arguments,” authors John Ramage, John Bean, and June Johnson compare several fallacies. The authors describe the straw man fallacy as an argument when a writer constructs a misinterpreted version of an argument that distorts its original meaning and intentions in order to criticizes it as if it were the real argument (401).

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: Aging Out In Foster Care

    165 Words  | 1 Pages

    In my own words the difference is rhetorical reasoning is deceiving like the author will makes you understand something and mean another while fallacy is less convincing because the reasoning is completely wrong Issue: Aging out in foster care Rhetorical appeal: Logos (Inductive reasoning): In 2012 there was 23,439 children that age out in foster care system and about 71% of young women are believed to get pregnant by age 21according to jimcaseyyouth.org that’s the reason why the statistic of children in foster care system keeps increasing. Logical fallacy: Either/or (This is a conclusion that oversimplifies the argument by reducing it to only two sides or choices): To control the rise of number of kids in foster care we need to give free birth control or let the number goes up.

    Read More

  • 1984 Fallacies Analysis

    934 Words  | 4 Pages

    These logical fallacies can most easily be found when O’Brien, a member of the Inner Party, is torturing Winston. O’Brien uses them to convince Winston of complete love of Big Brother. Logical fallacies completely persuaded Winston, because when he was tortured, he was squeezed empty, then O’Brien filled him up with fallacies, specifically anecdotal, false dichotomy, and strawman, about Big Brother. When his torture began, Winston was still able to hold onto his sanity, but by part way through he was reduced to a weak and blubbering sack of bones, this is where O’Brien begins to use fallacies, starting with anecdotal. For example: “‘ In the Middle Ages there was the Inquisition.

    Read More

  • Posner's Argument

    460 Words  | 2 Pages

    “It is the responsibility of the professor to conduct the class in such a way that maximal learning occurs, not maximal speech. That’s why no teacher would permit students to launch into anti-Semitic diatribes in a class about the Holocaust” (paragraph 5)I believe this is an Either/or fallacy. He tries to force a conclusion by pressing just two choices one which is clearly more desirable than the other. Another fallacy is “Teachers are dictators who carefully control what students say to one another.” Would this be an example of the Strawman fallacy, because of the lack of the support?

    Read More

  • How Is Fallacies Used In 12 Angry Men

    1783 Words  | 8 Pages

    Fallacies are used throughout the movie, but when the debate started, there are more uses of fallacies than towards the end, when the argument is almost developed. Fallacies are wrong or false beliefs that have little to no basis or evidence. The first use of this is when one of jurors says that all kids are liars and anything that kids say cannot not be trusted. There are many kids who are not liars. There are many children who do tell the truth and can

    Read More

  • Argument Of Justice In Plato's Book 1 Of The Republic

    732 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Book 1 of the republic, by Plato, we are introduced to two central figures in the argument of justice, Socrates and Thrasymachus. Thrasymachus claims that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates then asks if his understanding, that what is beneficial to the stronger is just and must be beneficial to the weaker people, to which Thrasymachus replies that no, this is not so. He explains that justice is that which obtains the advantage of the stronger.

    Read More

  • Woody 2000 Case Study

    1170 Words  | 5 Pages

    Project Concept and Strategy a. Was the Woody 2000 project well-conceived? Give reasons for your opinion. Ans. When a project is to be conceived, it broadly needs its planners to: - Lay down the objectives of the objectives of the project - Lay down the strategies, to achieve the objectives - Communicate these objectives to the staff - Break down the strategies into work activities - Assign members who would work on each of the activities - Decide the activities that will need outsourcing, and account for them - Assign timelines to each of the activities - Assign performance indicators/measurables to each of the activities - Estimate the cost of each activity, and thus the cost of the total project - Take into account the contingencies - Lastly,

    Read More

  • Fallacies In Critical Thinking

    275 Words  | 2 Pages

    Fallacy is “a reasoning ‘trick’ that an author might use while trying to persuade you to accept a conclusion” (Browne and Keeley, 85). They are known to be tricks or illusions of thoughts. They are often sneaky and seen everywhere specifically in politics, editorials, commercials, or advertisements. There are three common characteristics a critical reader should be suspicious of: reasons that requires inaccurate or incorrect assumptions, diverting a reader by making information seem relevant to the conclusion when it is not, and support of a conclusion that is already proven (Browne and Keeley, 85). Identifying these three characteristics will prevent a critical reader from being influenced.

    Read More

  • Essay On Aristotle's Theory Of Natural Slavery

    991 Words  | 4 Pages

    I will argue that even with the evidence provided, Aristotle’s theory on

    Read More

  • Heraclitus: The Doctrine Of Flux And The Unity Of Opposites

    1856 Words  | 8 Pages

    Plato employs Socratic discussion to converse upon these issues — encouraging his interlocutors to interrogate — by asking numerous open-ended questions in order implore others to examine their beliefs. Comparatively, Aristotle deviates from dialogue and instead expresses and elucidates on his theories in a prosaic and meticulous fashion. Plato’s work reads like an offbeat conversation between curious minds.

    Read More

More about Fallacy Literature Review

Open Document