Oklahoma lawmakers have passed a bill that would make performing an abortion a felony punishable by revocation of medical license, and three years in prison.
The legislation makes no exception to restriction on abortion apart from cases where mother 's life is endangered.
The bill was passed 33-12 in the senate, while last month it was approved 59-9 by House of Representatives.
The office of Governor Mary Fallin has said that she will not comment on the bill before the legislation is reviewed.
Fallin is known to have taken pro-life stance with passage of bills including banning abortions over 20 weeks, preventing coverage of abortions by health insurance policies, and increasing the waiting period before abortion from 24 hours to 72 hours.
Senator Nathan Dahm, one of the bill 's co-authors, has indicated that the bill seeks to restore human rights once accorded to unborn babies before the 1973 Roe v Wade ruling in US Supreme Court, which legalized abortions before 24 weeks.
"Since I believe life begins at conception, it should be protected, and I believe it 's a core function of state government to defend that life from the beginning of conception," said Dahm.
The bill is being opposed by pro-abortion groups, who say that it goes against constitution and are expected to sue the state government if it becomes a law.
"This obviously
…show more content…
"Since Governor Fallin took office in 2011, she has signed 18 bills restricting access to reproductive health care services, including a Texas-style clinic shutdown law, a ban on the most common method of second trimester abortion, unconstitutional restrictions on medication abortion, and a law that forces abortion providers to perform an ultrasound and display and describe the image. Each of these laws have been blocked by courts; in fact, the Center for Reproductive Rights has challenged unconstitutional restrictions on reproductive health care in Oklahoma eight times in five years," CRR said in another press
A recent federal lawsuit has been filed by the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) challenging the constitutionality of three provisions of the Setonia’s Abortion Laws. The three provisions ACLU are challenging are as follows (McCauliff): • Law which prevents state health officials from renewing or issuing licenses to abortion clinics located with 2000 feet of an elementary school (McCauliff). • Law which requires physicians performing abortions to complete 10 hours annually of continuing medical education on abortion procedures (McCauliff). • Law which requires abortion providers to give every patient a copy of her medical records, regardless of whether the patient requests such records (McCauliff).
After reviewing case precedent and examining the current literature, the decision stands that SB 127 is unconstitutional due to fetal viability, privacy, as well as the health of the mother. Justice Blackmun's trimester framework
An Open Letter To The Oklahoma State Senate: ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!? Seriously? For the first time in my life you have me ashamed to be an Oklahoman. Here we are in the middle of the worst budget crisis in the history of the state since the Great Depression, and what are you doing? Passing bills to outlaw abortion in Oklahoma.
The states currently hold the right to decide whether or not to allow abortion for the second and third trimesters. Regardless of the method, women fight
A heartbeat bill attempts to make abortion illegal after a heartbeat is detectable, an event that usually occurs only “six weeks after conception - before many women even realize they’re pregnant.” (Domonoske) Heartbeat bills have since popped up in Iowa as well, although it was promptly shut down 24 hours after being introduced. While Governor Kasich did veto the Ohio heartbeat bill in favor of another bill that would instead ban abortions after 20 weeks, this attempted bill is a good window to what the future could hold for laws regarding abortion. (Ludlow) The ever consistent objection to abortion is morality. People believe that it is immoral to take away the chance a fetus may have at life outside the womb.
Thank you for contacting me about H.R. 2972, Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance (EACH Woman) Act. I appreciate the opportunity to respond. The Hyde Amendment was introduced in 1976, as pro-life legislation that prohibits federal Medicaid coverage of abortion except in cases of rape, incest and when the mother’s life in jeopardy. The Each Women Act, introduced by Barbara Lee (D-CA) would restore accesses to abortion coverage to health insurance programs managed by the federal government.
Charlotte Taft once said “Women who have abortions do so because they value life and because they take very seriously the responsibilities that come not just with birth, but with nurturing a human being”. The Editorial Board at The New York Times believes in this statement as well. The Editorial Board published an editorial on June 27, 2016 titled “A major Victory for Abortion Rights”. The article published, is about a change in Texas 's anti-abortion law and is intended for woman who can or will bear children. The editorial was created to persuade these women that if another woman who is pregnant and cannot keep the unborn child or does not want to keep the child, that these women should have the right to abort the embryo or fetus legally.
Abortion has been a medical procedure for in the United States since as early as the 1880s. Historically it has been a medical procedure that was used when a woman’s life was in danger for medical reasons, rape, or incest. The Landmark case that set a new standard for Abortion in the United States came in 1973 in the state of Texas.
The Right to Abortion On January 22, 1973, in a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down it’s landmark decision in the case of Roe v. Wade, which recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians (Planned Parenthood). There are many moments in history when Roe v. Wade has been so close to being overturned, yet it is still in place. Abortion should stay legal, or not overturned, for the health of women everywhere. First, this important case took place at the time of abortion being illegal in most states, including Texas, where Roe v. Wade began.
The motivations for anti-abortion laws varied from state to state. But in 1973 the supreme court “recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians. ”(Planned Parenthood Roe) This was called Roe v. Wade.
By 1900, most abortions, except those ”necessary to save the life of a women,” had been outlawed through the efforts of physicians, legislators, and the American Medical Association. Although abortions were illegal and frowned upon, even with early feminists such as Susan B. Anthony, women were still able to
Before Roe v. wade the number of deaths from illegal abortions was around 5000 and in the 50s and 60s the number of illegal abortions ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year. These illegal abortions pose major health risks to the life of the woman including damage to the bladder, intestines as well as rupturing of the uterus. The choice to become a mother must be given to the woman most importantly because it’s her body, her health, and she will be taking on a great responsibility. A woman’s choice to choose abortion should not be restricted by anyone; there are multiple reasons why abortion will be the more sensible decision for the female.
Abortion is just a technical way of saying the murder of a unborn and should be abolished. Abortion is murder. According to lifenews.com, federal law prohibits the death penalty for a pregnant women until after the child is born. (18 U.S.C.A.S.3596). Doing this means according to the law, a innocent unborn infant cannot be sentenced to death for a crime he/she did not commit.
By removing this support, women who choose or have chosen abortion now feel as though they are the ones in the wrong, not the law. There is no doubt this law was set in place in hopes women would feel guilty and change their minds about abortion. Even if the women still choose to abort after this, they will feel more uncomfortable and ashamed about their
Restrictions on access to reproductive health care have been on the rise in the U.S. While many of these restrictions claim to target abortion, they have far reaching consequences that affect reproductive health care more broadly. These laws stem from the 1992 Supreme Court Case, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, reinforced that individuals have the right to abortion, but which also created the “undue burden” standard. The “undue burden” standard allowed for states to create restrictions on abortion, as long as they did not create an “undue burden”, or hardship, on those seeking or providing abortions. The state of Texas has used the undue burden standard to increasingly restrict access to abortion and reproductive health care. In 2010 and 2011, the Texas removed Planned Parenthood from its list of state affiliated Medicaid care providers, and cut its family planning budget from $111 million to $37.9 million, respectively (White et al., 2012).