False Argument Against Racial Profiling

I think if a parent wants to bake an officer a cake for saving her son from drowning then it is her way of showing appreciation in the way that she knows how to show her thankfulness. I do not think that officers should be allowed to accept bribes to turn their heads in a situation. The claim that has become more often declared against police is the false arrest. The person bringing the complaint assert that the police officers are in violation of the Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. If an officer has reason to think that the individual had committed a crime, then the arrest is within reasonable limitations, and the Fourth Amendment has not become violated.

The police can arrest without a warrant for a felony or misdemeanor committed in their presence of the officer. Although, in some states, warrantless arrests for misdemeanor and domestic assaults that have not perpetrated in the officer's presence are becoming allowed. Even if the information from the informant turns out to be false, the officer is not reliable if he or she has reason to believes that the information is accurate at the time of the arrest. To become able to gain the power back from a false arrest claim. The victim must show that the arresting officer had the lack of probable cause, that is, with the facts they are not sufficient enough of

To become eligible to win this type of claim, the victim must show four things: One the defendant police officer to begin a criminal proceeding. Two the process ends in the victim's favor that is that no conviction had become made. Three there was no probable cause; and four that the proceeding was brought with intentions to cause harm, and maliciousness toward the victim. As with any false arrest, claim if will fail if the officer had probable cause to initiate criminal proceedings (Find Law,